HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

_lyxd

no profile record

comments

_lyxd
·7 เดือนที่ผ่านมา·discuss
how are we going to deduce/measure/know the initialization and rules for consciousness? do you see any systems as not encodable/simulatable by quantum?
_lyxd
·7 เดือนที่ผ่านมา·discuss
per halting problem: any system capable of self reference has unprovable (un)truths, the system can not be complete and consistent. consciousness falls under this umbrella

I'll try and ask OG q more clearly: why would the brain, consciousness, be formalizable?

I think there's a yearn view nature as adhering to an underlying model, and a contrary view that consciousness is transcendental, and I lean towards the latter
_lyxd
·7 เดือนที่ผ่านมา·discuss
you may consider reading I am a strange loop for that, which can do far better justification than myself

if there's surely no algo to solve the halting problem, why would there be maths that describes consciousness?
_lyxd
·7 เดือนที่ผ่านมา·discuss
There's no reason to believe this to be the case. Godel says otherwise.
_lyxd
·7 เดือนที่ผ่านมา·discuss
Subsidizing the poor via ads is what we cheer for? bike theif brained understanding
_lyxd
·7 เดือนที่ผ่านมา·discuss
The gains from MoE is that you can have a large model that's efficient, it lets you decouple #params and computation cost. I don't see how anthropomorphizing MoE <-> brain affords insight deeper than 'less activity means less energy used'. These are totally different systems, IMO this shallow comparison muddies the water and does a disservice to each field of study. There's been loads of research showing there's redundancy in MoE models, ie cerebras has a paper[1] where they selectively prune half the experts with minimal loss across domains -- I'm not sure you could disable half the brain and notice a stupefying difference.

[1] https://www.cerebras.ai/blog/reap
_lyxd
·8 เดือนที่ผ่านมา·discuss
You're saying it like hardware and software are disjoint. You design hardware with software in mind (and vice versa); you need to if you want performance rivaling nvidia. This codesign, seeing their products are not only usable but actually tailored to maximize resource utilization in real workloads (not driven by w/e benchmarks), is where AMD seems to lack.

Why oversimplify the premise and frame your take as some 'proof'. Just use the term counter-argument/example
_lyxd
·8 เดือนที่ผ่านมา·discuss
> stuff that's been removed as a "feature" isn't always stuff that nobody wants.

Graphene isn't made to cater to what everyone wants. Face ID and fingerprint unlocking so clearly have no place in a hardened OS. "Google OS-level integration is absent" should not be suprising.

This said, you ought to be able to have BFU security with stock Android and it's embarrassing Google ships stock vulnerable.
_lyxd
·8 เดือนที่ผ่านมา·discuss
Aye but it is good Apple is safe out of the box. BFU is a low bar, and the shame is on Google.

>Lots more devices are safe BFU than just Apple's

Really? Secure against the exploits and methods these tools 3 letter agencies employ? I hate to cry source, but base Android isn't secure. What devices have similar hardware-level security, or have their Android flavor shipping with these Graphene-OS-level patches?
_lyxd
·9 เดือนที่ผ่านมา·discuss
>None of that is specialized to run only transformers at this point

isn't this what [etched](https://www.etched.com/) is doing?
_lyxd
·9 เดือนที่ผ่านมา·discuss
Why do you suppose this is a compute limited problem?
_lyxd
·10 เดือนที่ผ่านมา·discuss
what's the end game here, have a slew of of finetuned models for these varying edgecases?