HackerLangs
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

afry1

291 karmajoined 5 ปีที่แล้ว

comments

afry1
·เมื่อวาน·discuss
Most of them don't get access. So let's hook them up to an insane, unproven, unpredictable autocomplete math equation and entrust it to their development as a human being.

So gross.
afry1
·เมื่อวาน·discuss
Gross
afry1
·เมื่อวานซืน·discuss
Technology does not exist in a vacuum, nor does anything that is engineered. It's not this abstract stuff detached from the world.

PEOPLE make stuff, people use stuff, and people are ultimately the ones who are going to pick and choose which stuff gets made, used, adapted, enhanced, and carried into the future.

AI is an inherently anti-social, anti-human technology, and this rewrite is the perfect example of that.

Assessed from the perspective of "technology in a vacuum", of course. it's a success. He did the thing that transformed the thing from one kind of stuff to another kind of stuff. It still does all the things it did before, and in many cases with better stats than it did before.

Assessed from the human angle, and especially the angle of Bun as a community, I would bet money that this rewrite -- executed by nobody for nobody, built and maintained by machines, maintainable only by machines -- has killed the entire project.

Maintainable only by machines, because anybody with any knowledge, experience, or investment into Bun as a platform, or who contributed patches themselves, or whoever had a question about how it works and went "Hmm, I'm gonna go into the codebase and take a look at how that happens", they all got slapped in the face and summarily kicked out of the tent with the rewrite.
afry1
·4 เดือนที่ผ่านมา·discuss
And the leaders of these companies are so genuinely surprised at the fact that the people are refusing this technology.

Sam Altman: “Looking at what’s possible, it does feel sort of surprisingly slow.”

Satya Nadella: “For this not to be a bubble by definition, it requires that the benefits of this are much more evenly spread.”
afry1
·4 เดือนที่ผ่านมา·discuss
At least with a person, you can say that there's one person in your org that understands the code after they write it and submit it for review.

Maybe they stick around for a while, maybe they move on to another job, but they were THERE at some point. They have a name. You can ask them questions about what they did. And hey, they still exist in the real world too, so you can get in touch with them even after they leave if you need to.

AI powered development is like a guy shows up, gets hired for 90 seconds, writes part of a feature, and dies instantly once the code hits the screen.
afry1
·4 เดือนที่ผ่านมา·discuss
I sure don't.

But when I'm using all of those things (pickaxe, mineral mine, power station, internet network hub), I know that there was a thinking human being that took some measure of human care and consideration when creating them. And that there are people on the other side of the economic transaction to talk to or hold accountable when something goes wrong.
afry1
·4 เดือนที่ผ่านมา·discuss
"The future belongs to whoever understands what they just shipped."

Perfect summary.

It's like we invented a world where you can finally, _finally_ speedrun an enormous legacy codebase and all patted ourselves on the back like that was a good thing.
afry1
·4 เดือนที่ผ่านมา·discuss
If code must be correct, and review time is not free, and review time is costlier than code time, why not just ...

... write the code yourself?
afry1
·4 เดือนที่ผ่านมา·discuss
If code is now free, why does the language matter at all?
afry1
·10 เดือนที่ผ่านมา·discuss
Those Lasko fans have pretty raw edges on the blades of the fan itself, which I think contributes a lot to the noise. If you take the cover off, sand down the nubs and bits of flaking plastic, and reassemble, I think that will take care of a lot of noise.