How exactly can you tell what the performance is, given that its been screencapped at a certain fps, transcoded at a certain fps, likely downsampled along the way, etc...?
Puff piece. Notice how it barely talks about the app? That's because it's nothing. What makes Facebook defensible is its reach. How can Path defend itself from say even lowly Instagram? By reiterating their pedigree ad nauseum?
Ahem."use the new zyngaweb browser and earn an extra 20% Frontierville dollars." I think Zynga could induce serious (double digit) uptake onto their own browser. Once they have this kernel of user installations, where could they go next?
If one has to ask whether or not they got a good deal, is there really any possible chance that they got a good deal? Are you hoping the founders were simply charitable?
It's really hard to get perfect email deliverabiliy. God help any of your users who have Yahoo or Hotmail. There are no major flaws assuming you properly timestamp and sign your urls. But between email latency, deliverability, etc, not to mention how alien the experience will be to most people, I'm not sure if I would advise pursuing the system as a primary one.
NO reason. After all the only thing going into the database ought to be base64 encoded hash. So why not allow anything? No need for a max length, by the same token.