HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

barrucadu

no profile record

comments

barrucadu
·4 เดือนที่ผ่านมา·discuss
A style of animated TV show from Japan
barrucadu
·6 เดือนที่ผ่านมา·discuss
Read the rest of the sentence.
barrucadu
·6 เดือนที่ผ่านมา·discuss
Was the lockdown not during the pandemic?
barrucadu
·6 เดือนที่ผ่านมา·discuss
Are these answers so critical they're needed on a holiday?
barrucadu
·7 เดือนที่ผ่านมา·discuss
Don't the C parts of Linux heavily depend on GCC extensions too? Seems depending on specific compiler features isn't really a blocker.
barrucadu
·8 เดือนที่ผ่านมา·discuss
How does OpenAI being liable for reproducing copyrighted material imply that a word processor should be as well? Last time I checked, word processors don't have a black box text generator trained on pre-existing works: a word processor only has the text that the user types into it.

> Not really. Youtube is not liable as long as they remove the content after a copyright complain and other mechanisms.

They have to take action precisely because they're liable for the material on their platform.
barrucadu
·8 เดือนที่ผ่านมา·discuss
I take it you think copyright shouldn't exist at all, then?
barrucadu
·8 เดือนที่ผ่านมา·discuss
Obviously there's a limit, reproducing a single sentence is unlikely to be copyright infringement just because there are only so many words in a language; but if reproducing some text would be copyright infringement if a human did it, I don't see why LLM companies should get a free pass.

If it's really essential that they train their models on song lyrics, or books, or movie scripts, or articles, or whatever, they should pay license fees.
barrucadu
·8 เดือนที่ผ่านมา·discuss
> I don’t think a country’s government can justify no commercial LLMs to its populace

They're not saying no LLMs, they're saying no LLMs using lyrics without a license. OpenAI simply need to pay for a license, or train an LLM without using lyrics.
barrucadu
·4 ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
> These are both bad outcomes

Why?
barrucadu
·6 ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
Add is a piece of data, not a function. The equivalent in C would be something like:

    enum function { add, ... };

    // then inside your code
    switch(myfunction) {
    case add:
        return a + b;
    ...
Defunctionalisation is about removing higher-order functions, not about naming anonymous functions.

It's not a new trend, the first citation on wikipedia is to a paper in 1972.