>American Nazis were using it to organize the Charlottesville demonstration. That's not a form of brand identification you want.
The only "people" at fault here are journalists, putting Discord in the title of the article. They do it to put pressure on the service providers so they ban those people, but they will just go elsewhere. It's frankly stupid. The only side who's hurt with those articles is Discord, who don't deserve it.
It's used by all kinds of groups. Developers, gamers, but also left and right groups, etc.
I don't understand what the problem is if someone who supports something I don't like (be it alt-right, liberal, whatever) uses the platform, as long as he doesn't bother me personally :/
That's odd... "David Benatar" and "Joshua Rothman", having a conversation in "New York", published on "The New Yorker", arguing we should have no more children.
The only "people" at fault here are journalists, putting Discord in the title of the article. They do it to put pressure on the service providers so they ban those people, but they will just go elsewhere. It's frankly stupid. The only side who's hurt with those articles is Discord, who don't deserve it.