### Title here
This is some text [with a url](http://google.com)
vs. [size=6][font=arial, helvetica, sans-serif]Title here[/font][/size]
This is some text [url="http://google.com"]with a url[/url]
BBCode was written to be written, it's no more difficult to write [url=http://google.com]google[/url]
than it is to write: [google](http://google.com)
but when reading the source (for maintaining) it... sucks, because it feels un-natural. With the Markdown version of linking (to pick a basic example) you can read a sentence how the person reading the processed version would read it: A search engine called [google](http://google.com)
That reads as "A search engine called google" and then you see that google is a hyperlink. With BBCode it would read: A search engine called [url=http://google.com]google[/url]
So first you read "A search engine called" then you see it's a URL and then you see "google". It can get very frustrating when you're looking at huge swathes of text written in a similar style. vote?for=3742852&dir=up&by=citricsquid&auth=478876d54494692615d9f2ca184fa9fab2fb9ff7&whence=%69%74%65%6d%3f%69%64%3d%33%37%34%32%37%34%32
edit: oh, official API is above. Disregard this one :-)