If the Tor management wants to fire him, that's up to them. For any reason, or no reason at all. It's their decision. On the other hand, "rape" is a delicate matter, and all of this shouldn't have been discussed in public.
>I believe them. You should, too.
I don't believe them for two reasons:
1) There is no actual proof. I don't believe things for which there's no proof.
2) It's possible multiple people didn't like him and therefore between themselves they decided to accuse him of rape to get rid of him.
This should be settled in court, not with witch hunting.
I personally don't care about the people who work on a project that should be strictly technical. I don't understand why did they have to mix politics in.
The Tor project, as many other popular open source projects, has been infiltrated by tons of people who like to use the popularity of it to spread their liberal propaganda. That's why it's in their interests to make as much noise as possible.
The project itself is full with all sorts of people with mental illnesses, including sexual deviations, and a strong political bias--it's a massive echo chamber right now.
And it's a shame because of the nature of this project: it should be kept neutral. Similar to the EFF for example.
That's correct for many websites, but others such as Facebook have such a complicated but still correct UI on a desktop that it's appropriate to have two different websites.