You initially claimed that you flagged the article because it doesn't meet your "lived experiences". When challenged on the validity of that reasoning you abandon that claim and now justify flagging it because it's "political in nature and controversial". The truth is you simply don't like what's being said and would therefor like to suppress it, and lacking a more valid motivation will concoct whatever justification you think will be seen as valid, as you've already demonstrated. By misrepresenting your motivations you've shown that you're acting in bad faith, and because you're acting in bad faith any further justifications you offer should be disregarded.