Oh, I don't really think so, no, but it is conceivable. And I'd actually rather have people communicate what they believe to be true rather than what they think they can get away with.
When BLM is mentioned, I often see people criticize their methods, the underlying ideology of some members and their claims to truth. I have never seen anyone not care about black people being killed.
There is, of course, a possibility that I'm living in an opaque filter bubble and that the racist hordes are just outside. If I am, please pop that bubble and show me the truth.
Thank you for actually replying instead of downvoting...and I'll admit, the scare quotes may have been a bit too much!
That said, the open letter plainly states "WhatsApp effectively protects people against mass surveillance."
How do they know? From this, and the entire tone of the letter, it looks to me like they're still implicitly trusting that WhatsApp does what it claims to do. I see absolutely no reason to do so, and am utterly baffled that top security experts do.
This entire conflict just seems completely absurd to me - why on earth are the 72 "experts" who signed the open letter so quick to trust WhatsApp without access to the source code?
Anecdotal experience with twitter's timeline suggests it's viewing time - and that they haven't considered that people are just spending more time finding the tweets they're looking for...
This isn't surprising at all. IQ is highly correlated with genetics (especially for older teens and adults), and the correlation between IQ and income is similarly strong.
I played around with this, but had some trouble removing the audio stream from the MOV file using ffmpeg.
There's a third data stream in the file, and ffmpeg doesn't know how to handle it, so it either gets removed or replaced with dummy data. The javascript framework seems to need this third stream to work, which is pretty annoying...
I'd love to do something with this, but without a simple (and preferably scriptable) way to remove the audio I probably won't...