HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

emmett

no profile record

comments

emmett
·4 เดือนที่ผ่านมา·discuss
Softmax | softmax.com | San Francisco (onsite) | Full-time

THE MOST IMPORTANT UNSOLVED PROBLEM IN AI IS THE MOST POWERFUL OF ALL CAPABILITIES: ALIGNMENT.

Hi, I'm Emmett. You may know me as the founder of Twitch (YC S05), and as the (extremely) interim CEO of OpenAI.

I believe the question of how AI systems learn to understand themselves and others is one of the most consequential technical problems of our time. If we get it right, the agents we build today will become our friends and collaborators tomorrow. And the infrastructure required to train agents that are good at working in teams and societies will be extraordinarily valuable.

Softmax is building large-scale multi-agent, multi-policy environments that will benchmark AI agents – both our own and others – on their capacity for theory of mind, adaptive goal setting, and teamwork. We’re looking for the engineers who will make that possible.

The work is unusually hard. The problems are ambiguous and challenging. High autonomy, high expectations. You'll work directly with me and the rest of our small but mighty team.

If this sounds exciting, I’m looking forward to meeting you. E

——————————————————— Hiring: Software Engineer https://softmax.com/jobs/softwareengineer Mention “HN Who’s Hiring” in the "How did you hear about this” field ———————————————————
emmett
·2 ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
Active Inference is kinda "a joint learning of the state representation with the search algorithm"...or at least, related to the idea. I like framing it as a joint learning problem.
emmett
·3 ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
Everything old is new again (FoxPro says hi https://www.altap.cz/images/salamander/features/database-vie...)
emmett
·3 ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
I can’t quite reconcile this article with what I’ve seen before like this below…the methodology in the OP seems pretty questionable, so I trust this other article more.

https://www.aei.org/carpe-diem/fortune-500-firms-1955-v-2016...
emmett
·3 ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
Safeway seems to be run pretty well, after being taken private by PE in the 80s.

Warren Buffet runs Berkshire Hathaway which is acts as a PE firm. Here's a list of everything they own and have owned for decades: https://finmasters.com/berkshire-hathaway-subsidiaries/#cons...

There are plenty of other examples.

PE is just "ownership not through the public stock markets" which is like...the default, actually.
emmett
·10 ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
You are exactly correct. Nothing is off-topic on Hacker News; the rule is "anything that gratifies one's intellectual curiosity", so that's a pretty wide mandate.

I know you're saying you're not complaining, but you clearly are. Complaining things are off-topic isn't really helpful.

I don't think the article is very good, but the problem isn't that LSD usage is somehow off-topic.
emmett
·14 ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
So anyone who owns a whole-market stock index is prohibited from making political comment of any kind, because they "have a financial interest in a company benefiting from the likes of Monsanto"?

Think about what you're saying. No one has defended Monsanto, because the point is that whether Monsanto is good or bad is completely irrelevant to point being made about intellectual property rights.
emmett
·14 ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
1) Please don't preface your comment with a statement about people downmoding you. All that does is make me think, "well, the following opinion will probably be poorly thought out flamebait". It's also against the site guidelines.

2) There's a large gap between funding a company which sells something to a company which has a political point of view you disagree with, and actively sponsoring bad legislation. In fact, I can't see how those two things can even be compared. So, your first statement "I will probably be downvoted" is true. Implicitly you're claiming the downvoting will be unfair, but your claim doesn't make much sense, so that's probably the reason it'll happen.
emmett
·18 ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
Google's products succeed because they're technically brilliant and well executed, not because their design is massively better (see: iPod, iPhone).

Google avoids bad design by the simple expedient of making everything sparse and functional, which is the way to go if you're not a great designer.