HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

fauxpause_

no profile record

comments

fauxpause_
·3 ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
> For example, an effectiveness of 40% means that incidence of infection in the three-dose cohort was 40% less than that in the two-dose cohort.

It’s a relative hazard ratio. % less likely to get COVID vs. the cohort with just the vaccine
fauxpause_
·3 ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
Relative effectiveness. It means you were 26% less likely to get COVID vs those with the vaccine but no booster
fauxpause_
·3 ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
[flagged]
fauxpause_
·3 ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
Each of three top scientists on the weapon said something treasonous? Or collectively as a group? Nah. Dumb theory.

They’re getting arrested because they promised Putin an unstoppable weapon and now he looks like a dumbass.
fauxpause_
·3 ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
The is saying that it’s wrong that hypersonic are bad because they’re fast. It goes on to clarify why the new tech is bad. And, imo, implies that this includes the ones referenced in the beginning. But in reality it does not.

But whatever. Semantics at this point.
fauxpause_
·3 ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
The problem with filming AA deployments is not about hiding the efficacy of AA deployments. It’s about hiding their locations.

What is the purpose of arresting your missile scientists for treason? What’s your best case interpretation?
fauxpause_
·3 ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
I don’t agree that the article makes this clear. The article states

> These are specifically designed for ballistic threats, which are common, and their extreme effectiveness is precisely why Russia and China have invested in something else.

And

> Russia used hypersonic missiles against Ukraine” — alarming! The average member of the public, as well as many policymakers, now understand that these things are dangerous because they are just too fast to shoot down. Clearly something needs to be done… (sarcastic)

It really ought to make clear explicitly in the article that the missiles it referred to in the beginning are NOT what it spends the rest of the article discussing.

It confused me at least. Because, without doing further research, I assumed the Kinzhals must not be ballistic because they’re indirectly referenced in an article about maneuverable missiles!
fauxpause_
·3 ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
I guess? The article is the thing that introduces them as such and does not clarify to begin the problem, imo.
fauxpause_
·3 ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
Shrug. The Kremlin loudly arresting the Kinzhal developers for treason after the Kinzhals get shot down suggests a clear narrative to me about who is telling the truth.

The best case you can make for Russia is that the Kinzhal developers actually did commit treason but in a way that was unrelated to the Kinzhal missiles not being effective which is… laughable
fauxpause_
·3 ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
China is not sending missiles to Russia
fauxpause_
·3 ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
Russia arresting the Kinzhal developers for treason (read: failure) tells you all you need to know.

Note also that they purposefully forbid videos of air defenses to avoid showing where air defenses are.

At least one Kinzhal was confirmed shot down earlier before the wave of 6 or so.
fauxpause_
·3 ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
“Unstoppable* missile”

*have been stopped
fauxpause_
·3 ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
I agree. But I don’t think the article makes that clear. In fact I think it strongly implies otherwise that the missiles being used against Ukraine are the scary maneuvering kind.
fauxpause_
·3 ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
The article begins by referring to Russia using Hypersonic missiles against Ukraine, and then goes into detail about what defenses are necessary to defend against these weapons.

It’s a good article. But the reality is that the Russian missiles making headlines don’t meet the specs of the article. Ukraine is shooting them down just fine using decades old technology.
fauxpause_
·3 ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
The non-ballistic variety that Russia claimed was unstoppable has been stopped several time in the past couple weeks now that Ukraine has Patriot systems. Seems like they’re not really a big deal at all.
fauxpause_
·3 ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
idk man, stopping doing a thing that is immensely profitable shows integrity if you ask me.
fauxpause_
·3 ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
I’m curious of anyone can validate that? This article and others appear to claim it is gone.
fauxpause_
·3 ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
I don’t think it’s a compromise of your moral beliefs to play a fun multiplayer game

Or at least it ought not to be
fauxpause_
·3 ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
That is irrelevant?
fauxpause_
·3 ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
Active shooter drills are very boring and met with mockery fwiw.