gastonfournier

3 ปีที่แล้วdiscuss

I think expires is just a signal for a feature that should "potentially" be removed. I believe it's a good way to focus on the ones you should pay attention to. But, it might be cool if you could say "Yes, I know, please extend this for another period" (or do not notify me again for another month)

gastonfournier

3 ปีที่แล้วdiscuss

There are a few case studies listed in most of the feature flag solutions, of course, each organization is completely different and the maturity of each organization varies. But feature flags are a 2-way-door decision, meaning that you can adopt them at smaller scale, try it out and see if it works for you before making a decision.

Here's a list of case studies from some of the solutions referred in the comments, some focus on operational metrics, others in lead time to changes: https://www.getunleash.io/case-studies https://launchdarkly.com/case-studies/ https://www.flagsmith.com/case-studies

gastonfournier

3 ปีที่แล้วdiscuss

AFAIK, it'd only open a PR if the flag is fully enabled and has some heuristics to determine when it's safe to remove. Honestly, I haven't tested it but I'm curious to know if someone had either good or bad experiences.

If all the PRs are instantly rejected, that would be a bad sign, but I couldn't find someone who effectively used it. I mean, it's been around for a while but it didn't spread out, so that already gives me some hint

gastonfournier

3 ปีที่แล้วdiscuss

The main challenge is when things go wrong. Feature flags are designed for high-rate evaluation with low latency responses. Configuration usually doesn't care that much about latency as it's usually read once at startup. This context leads to some very specific tradeoffs such as erring to availability over consistency, which in the case of configuration management could be a bad choice

gastonfournier

3 ปีที่แล้วdiscuss

It can be done by opening a PR, I haven't tried it yet, but I'm curious to try out https://github.com/uber/piranha or maybe hear some experiences if someone has used it

gastonfournier

3 ปีที่แล้วdiscuss

Victim of your own success. As others were saying, when it works for short-lived its easy/no effort to use it for long-lived configurations.

gastonfournier

3 ปีที่แล้วdiscuss

Yes, please!

gastonfournier

3 ปีที่แล้วdiscuss

I agree that if you have only a few changes going to prod, fast and doing canary testing, you should be covered. In my experience that's rarely the case because of multiple teams deploying changes at the same time, and even deployments in external services causing side effects in other services.

gastonfournier

3 ปีที่แล้วdiscuss

It's true that there are more long-lived use cases, but if you have the ability to choose, runtime controlled ones cover both cases, while compile time only cover some use cases. But fair point

gastonfournier

3 ปีที่แล้วdiscuss

I faced something similar, and I think it's unavoidable. Give people a screwdriver and they'll find a way of using it as a hammer.

The best you can do is expect the feature flagging solution to give some kind of warning for tech debt. Then equip them with alternative tools for configuration management. Rather than forbidding, give them options, but if it's not your scope, I'd let them be (I know as engineers this is hard to do :P).