As far as UI/UX design is concerned, I'm kind of surprised Amazon doesn't favor themselves more. Though I guess in their mind any customer going through them is still a sale.
Regardless, would a business want to sell on Amazon if they were treated second?
> The fact that you even have to be that careful is a bad customer experience.
This we can agree on, ideally Amazon would go through some evaluation process to determine that a seller is legitimate. Instead as far as I know they just let user reviews decide.
Side note though, Amazon really needs some competition. I can't recall the last time I bought anything online (that needed to be shipped) that wasn't through Amazon. For example, I used to buy computer parts from sites like Newegg, but unless there's a particularly good deal I'm probably going to Amazon. Clothing? Amazon. I don't want to have Levis and Hanes shipped separately.
> Sellers have completely gamed search, ratings, reviews, everything and Amazon, by design, makes it really hard to tell if you're buying something "shipped and sold by Amazon" vs some other shady seller whose products are only being fulfilled by Amazon
I have to disagree with you on that. I've personally not had an issue seeing who the seller is, and to double check I went to Amazon, clicked on the very first thing, a moon lamp, and it clearly stated right under in-stock, who it was sold by and that it was being fulfilled by Amazon.
I think amongst friends this is reasonable. It would be no different than say helping someone restore old family photos.
However in the context of research, callous as this may be, native American cultures are almost all endangered or extint. Sharing what little records we have left is basically the only way any of those cultures get to continue.
https://www.pbs.org/video/pbs-space-time-dyson-sphere/
The article is just a plug for this video and pushing ads for popular mechanics.