HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

hitovst

no profile record

comments

hitovst
·4 ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
Liars who wish to divide us use lie about "priviledge", etc. to confuse us, their enemies, and turn us against each other.

99.9% of the time, "deserve" applies to that which one has. Kind of like people who are confused about "respect".. they believe that when an ally tells them a truth they don't like, it is "disrespectful", and when a liar lies to them in a way they find pleasant, it's "respectful", when in both cases, the opposite is true.

A newborn hasn't "earned" what they have, but they deserve it because it is, and because their ancestors earned it for them. The wealthiest/healthiest people aren't people who at some point in their life learned a healthy diet, how to exercise, and to earn a high wage.. The healthiest/wealthiest people are those who had ancestors who sacrificed to earn, preserve, and teach, health/wealth to their descendants.

There are some people who spend money before they get it, and there are others who earn and save for their great grandkids who they don't expect to meet. The great grandkids don't earn their place when they're born, but their parents, grandparents, and great grandparents earned that place for them.

When people understand that IQ is inherited, and can't really be permanently increased (but can be permanently decreased through abuse, malnutrition, etc.), and that children require growing up in a family with married parents all living together to be healthy, their children will be far better off than those of people who don't realize those two things. If one lives their life accordingly, they will earn the several advantages for their children. It will be their child's to build from for future generations, or squander.

TL/DR; Elite backgrounds are "elite" for a reason. It is deserved, and based in merit.
hitovst
·4 ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
...while at the same time, being used in proxy wars.
hitovst
·4 ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
It might be that GM, and Ford, will sell more EVs than Tesla by 2025, which would mean people stopped purchasing Teslas. I didn't think it possible for GM or Ford to manufacture more EVs than Tesla by 2025, though.
hitovst
·4 ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
This is a foolish waste of time.
hitovst
·4 ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
"Healing Our World" by Dr. Mary Ruwart
hitovst
·4 ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
The problem comes when liars have to perpetually maintain so many lies that they must persecute anyone courageous enough to speak the truth. It doesn't even matter if they're right, just that they can and do think for themselves, and have the spine to speak out despite the show of conformity. They attempt to dominate language to control everything else. That, and fear.. Laughter helps cure people of fear. They need people afraid, divided, and willing to give up essential liberty for the illusion of security.

Disobedience in intolerable.

Slavers are antithetical to truth, and vice versa.

SPEAK THE TRUTH.
hitovst
·4 ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
Individuals decide for one. It's the slavers/slaves that want to decide for, & force, other people. If individuals decide to work together, or not, that is their right.

>You don't know how true is your manly bravado until your life, and the lives of those you love, are on the line and defenseless.

Freedom is the only possible security. Everything else is a fantasy. Sincerely, good luck with your principles. Please allow for others who think/believe differently, and do not try to sabotage them. As always, force is the issue. You're welcome to persuade, not to coerce.
hitovst
·4 ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
That's an easy question to answer for both free man, and slave.
hitovst
·4 ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
We should let the silly individualists persist in their delusions in one lone location, right? Or, not even allow the one?

If not, why not?
hitovst
·4 ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
Live free or die: Death is not the worst of evils.

Here's the thing about freedom, Earth, and humanity.. there is only nation that exists for the sole purpose of protecting the inalienable rights of the individual. The brave who would be free should live only there. The cowards who would be slaves should live literally anywhere else. As long as slaves don't go to the lone place for those who would be free, and try to eliminate the option, then time will tell whether or not it is a good idea.

Putting all of your eggs in one basket is dumb. Let the cowboys ignore the slavers' pretenses, and the fearful surrender for what at first seems like a less frightening fiction if they insist.

Should the aliens come, and there is resisting to be done, it would be done best by free men and women.. though, like a supernova, or Persians at the hot gates, someday our days are up. We can betray ourselves, or not. As always, the issue is force. Make your choice, and don't force others to go along with it.
hitovst
·4 ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
There could be. There absolutely will be pretenses of it if the slavers think it will work to herd us in the direction they want us to go.

Slavers don't have points or principles, only pretenses meant to enable their crimes.

Freedom is for the brave. There are only individual rights. They want you frightened collectivists, so you can be divided, and conquered, and you will forfeit essential liberty for the illusion of security.

Just remember, safety is not possible without freedom. Whatever their pretense, assure them you won't be willing slaves, and then sit back and enjoy the show.
hitovst
·4 ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
Keep in mind that the sovereign individuals of the United States have only permitted congress the ability to coin gold and silver, and that legal tender "laws" are criminal.

I have every right to make "Hitovst Nickels", and you have every right to not accept them. The crime comes with the gun in the room forcing you to accept them.

"Dollar" is a term that includes silver. When corrupt US government debased the currency, it was no longer a dollar, but counterfeit. FRNs are not dollars. No fiat currency is a dollar."

People, scam artist or no, should be free to create whatever currency they want.. it's the forcing others to accept it that is a crime.
hitovst
·4 ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
If you can own the bank in the freest/richest society, you can inflate away enough wealth to bribe it into enabling government schools, criminal legal tender "laws", becoming the world reserve fiat global enslavement system, and then inflate away 99.9999% of all the wealth of humanity in perpetuity... that is if you're willing to play as anti-human.
hitovst
·4 ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
I was expecting a lighter than air inflatable.
hitovst
·4 ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
hitovst
·4 ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
The demand for the big diesel SUVs that get about 9 miles to a gallon has gone away, and people are trying to sell them for 20% of what they'd bring a year ago.
hitovst
·4 ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
Have you seen what has happened to the market for fuel inefficient vehicles lately?
hitovst
·4 ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
I think you misunderstood my point. The democratic process is obsolete, aside from a show of hands. I'm not suggesting that we should therefore go with a show of hands.. I am suggesting that we should understand that voting is now a pretense meant to get us all to go along with whatever corruption.

Verifying an election process is one thing. If you're saying that if we can verify an election, and it can still be corrupted by criminals, so be it. All the more reason to end the farce. Sticking our head in the sand in pretending it's viable is not reasonable, and is perilous.
hitovst
·4 ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
It drives me nuts that we don't have a printer/toner database with cost per page.
hitovst
·4 ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
Musk made them an offer with contingencies. If they're not providing data to meet the contingencies, they're defaulting for whatever reason, including possibly that they misrepresented their product. If they do provide data, and the contingencies aren't met, there is no deal, as they misrepresented their product. If they provide data, and the contingencies are met, Musk would be in default to not close. There is chance Musk was bluffing, but it seems likely the other way around. I don't know how it could be that Twitter would think Musk wouldn't check to verify what he was purchasing. Seems a huge waste of time.

I suspect that Musk was willing to purchase Twitter if legitimate, and knew if Twitter was fraudulent, this process would shed light on it. If the deal is void due to Twitter misrepresenting itself, Musk can invest in a legitimate venture instead.

I don't see a whole lot of reason for speculation. The deal will close, or it will not. Chances are, Musk wasn't kidding when he made the offer, which means if it doesn't close, Twitter misrepresented itself.