Yet another worthless article lamenting the fact that an immensely privileged person had a minor inconvenience to their lifestyle.
It's not exactly something that "gratifies one's intellectual curiosity", as according to the HN guidelines - obsessing over the idle rich is not an intellectual pursuit.
HN has an unhealthy slant towards giving more consideration toward rich people's problems, such as this.
Also, per the guidelines, an HN submission should be something that "gratifies one's intellectual curiosity". An edge case in US taxation that could affect only those wealthy enough to have an art collection doesn't really fit that definition.
It's not exactly something that "gratifies one's intellectual curiosity", as according to the HN guidelines - obsessing over the idle rich is not an intellectual pursuit.