Well the licence fee of matlab is pretty massive (2500€ / user, and then each toolbox is 500 or 1000 euros each..), and then you have do deal with activation issues if you happen to switch computers quite often. Octave is a good alternative to run your matlab code if you don't need the "fancy" matlab ide.
The octave interpreter is slower than matlab, but that's because there is a JIT compiler in matlab. octave is still a good tool in my opinion.
OSC is just a way of packaging messages with an optional timestamp, despite its name, nothing in OSC is specialized for audio applications. There is no pre-defined convention for "Note-On" messages, "Note-Off", "Sustain Pedal" etc... If someone had taken the time to define these messages maybe it could have been a replacement candidate, but without this it offers nothing more than json.
Also OSC is typically transported on UDP messages (because it is easy to do), but that's a terrible transport since it is unreliable, and messages larger that some OS and network dependent size are just discarded, so you can only use it reliably for message bundles smaller than a few hundred bytes.
> Kinda weird that PACE works with intellectual property and licensing, and not in audio software development themselves.
A lot of their customers use JUCE, so there is a connection even if not very strong.
What is also good (in my opinion) is that they are not a big player of the audio software. If JUCE had been acquired by, for example, Steinberg, I would be very worried.
Very interesting, I was wondering why my cat was trying to chew my leg when I tried to pet him just after spraying myself with mosquito&tick repellent. It seems he just want me to share some repellent with him !
It is not intended to harm Apple or Steinberg, the aim is to be less dependent of them by having a free and non-bloated common plugin api that has basically all the features of VST/AU/AAX/LV2 etc. All these proprietary apis can then be addressed with a bit of wrapping code when needed.
Right now, the de-facto most important standard is VST3, which is owned by Steinberg/Yamaha who can decide to revoke the license of any developer at their will. They have shown these last years that they can be really aggressive with their license. If clap takes over, then they won't have the same position of power on audio developers. This is good for the industry.
Even if there wasn't this licensing issue with VST3, none of the current plugin formats deserve to be the "default plugin format" , they are all terrible: very large codebases, bloated architectures, c++ api, unclear threading specifications... (exception: VST2 which is simple, with a c api, but Steinberg is not allowing it anymore for new developers).
I wonder if anybody has estimations of the contribution of anti-virus software to global warming. They run on almost all desktop computers, are generally large and bloated applications that consume tons of cpu for their continuous scans, I would not be too surprised if was far from negligible.
Firefox is larger on macOS because it contains 2 archs (x86_64 and arm64), not because it bundles of full runtime -- also the compression algo of dmg files is typically quite bad (zlib or bzip2), which is not helping.