HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

jeauxlb

no profile record

comments

jeauxlb
·7 เดือนที่ผ่านมา·discuss
It is a well-known description for what each brand calls something different. As I wait in a physiotherapist office I am being subjected to a soap opera against my will. Many will have seen snippets of The Bold and the Beautiful without watching a single episode, but enough to know that it looks 'different'.
jeauxlb
·12 เดือนที่ผ่านมา·discuss
Kind of amazing that calling their product "Core 2 Duo" was considered their safe branding choice before this.
jeauxlb
·ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
Search, music streaming, books: heavily consolidated markets where the value-based offering has supremacy (Google vs any paid search; Spotify/Apple Music vs Tidal; Amazon vs anything). It's the market supremacy that generally allows this.

If quality were a sufficiently motivating aspect, Google's deteriorating search wouldn't be a constant theme on this site, and people on the street would know where to download and play a FLAC file.
jeauxlb
·ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
You might be conflating capitalism (owning things like factories) with consumerism (buying things like widgets).

If all of the factory owners discover a type of widget to sell that can incidentally drive down wages the more units they move, it's unlikely for consumers to be provided much choice in their future widgets.
jeauxlb
·ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
NPM will automate Let's Encrypt certificate generation but you're right about the other listed features.
jeauxlb
·ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
I can go into an art gallery but I may not touch the works. Often there aren't physical barriers but we all understand some behaviours are not acceptable.

Similarly, publication of an image on the internet is not implicit permission to use it for any possible purpose, however technically feasible. For example, deepfakes.
jeauxlb
·2 ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
This is easily solved. Particularly as industry is such a large contributor to GHG emissions, imposing a carbon tax on industry and possibly even allowing grandfathering allows the costs to be baked in to (only) future considerations, and makes cleaner companies more competitive compared to dirtier ones.
jeauxlb
·2 ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
Why are you happy that people are out of a job here? You still suffer the ills of the product, now infinitely more incessant, at a marginal cost of $0.
jeauxlb
·2 ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
At least one Australian law outlaws them https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2015/03/australia_out...
jeauxlb
·2 ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
I wonder how this compares to using Discog's API [1] and searching by barcode with a USB barcode scanner. Almost all of my record covers have some sort of barcode on them and I find the accuracy of searching Discogs to be quite high for records with reasonable popularity. Given the examples shown in the video, I would expect no problem.

[1] https://www.discogs.com/developers
jeauxlb
·2 ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
It's not that ironic; it's a web page that contains far more information that one might expect in any but the largest of emails.

The web is where the eyeballs are and nobody's going to convince anyone of a new idea by wrapping whole-page content in a <pre> tag, no matter the idealological purity this would reveal. To reduce friction (already created by telling someone to potentially change email clients) with readers the author needs to speak the visual language of the medium.
jeauxlb
·3 ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
The free version of this software is available at https://github.com/Free-GPGMail/Free-GPGMail
jeauxlb
·3 ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
Does paperless have the same support for workflows and indexes as Mayan? I use these two features heavily to automatically place documents into a hierarchy (eg payslips into their financial year). That and the ability to add arbitrary fields like 'parent', which then means I can created a linked list style association between documents, for example a series of correspondence. It's been a while since I looked at paperless and its forks, but I understand it's not quite built to have such extensibility/flexibility?