HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

johnlorentzson

no profile record

comments

johnlorentzson
·ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
That sounds about right. (Just to clarify, what I was referring to with "did not exist at the time" was specifically Self's JIT and its new techniques.)
johnlorentzson
·ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
With regards to performance, Craig Chambers's thesis on the Just-In-Time compiler for Self proves pretty definitively that a language as (or more) flexible as Smalltalk can be very performant without losing any dynamic properties. It certainly isn't an easy compiler/runtime to recreate for any given language, but it does exist.

It didn't exist at the time you're referring to however, so in that context the point does stand, mostly. I believe there was some form of flexible compiled optimization for Smalltalk (since Chambers's thesis references it as prior work) but I forget when that was and how commonly used it was.
johnlorentzson
·4 ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
That sounds about right. It's very easy to make something resembling a Lisp, and even easier to call the result a Lisp.
johnlorentzson
·4 ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
DOOM was definitely made with DOS in mind, but it also ran on NeXT from the beginning. It's pretty portable actually. Since you cited Fabien Sanglard, I guess I should mention that his book about DOOM's source code (Game Engine Black Book: DOOM) explains how the portability stuff (as well as almost everything else) worked in great detail.
johnlorentzson
·4 ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
The Build engine's source code isn't enough to port any game running on it, since Build was made as a library (I believe most developers using Build in the 90s didn't have access to the source code).

Also, wasn't there an official Blood port by Nightdive Studios?
johnlorentzson
·4 ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
Dan Weinreb (one of the founders of Symbolics) wrote a rebuttal to this article in 2007. The comments are also worth reading.

https://web.archive.org/web/20121107150708/http://danweinreb...