Lots of comments here about what this means for asymptomatic spread amongst the housed population.
Is it too obvious to be said that the government needs to house homeless people in hotels immediately, and that group shelters are going to get people killed? 62 comments as of writing and no one is talking about unhoused people as if they are worth considering for their own sake.
The also just secured a $10 Billion contract with the US military, which is one of the largest emitters of carbon on the planet.
Americans have been reticent to downsize the military for the benefit of everyone else on the planet, but we might just get around to it for our own benefit in reducing emissions.
The satire is a little imprecise here, but this is literally why there's a Green New Deal being proposed. We can address climate change AND make sure everyone has a livelihood while society undergoes the massive changes necessary.
What you're missing is nuclear is too slow to spin up! We simply don't have time. We need to cut emissions 50% in 10 years, and nuclear is not going to get us there. Look to other renewables.
We have 10 years to cut 50% of emissions. We literally can't build enough nuclear plants in that time, it's very slow. It's also really expensive. We have to use other renewables.
It's really not about broadcasting their opinions to you, it's about getting the company to make changes that help mitigate climate change, which threatens the safety of everyone on planet earth?
Your argument is pretty bad, but also, have you heard of prison abolitionism? It's a thing. We don't need the carceral state. The US prison system in its current form is a monster, arguing anything different can only be done from ignorance.
Is it too obvious to be said that the government needs to house homeless people in hotels immediately, and that group shelters are going to get people killed? 62 comments as of writing and no one is talking about unhoused people as if they are worth considering for their own sake.