By "class action" I presume you're referring to the US. If so, no, the courts of law are forbidden to you. You will instead go to a secret tribunal where the laws do not matter. The arbiter will only continue to be paid if they continue to rule for corporations.
They appear to have moved carefully to set this up over the course of weeks by setting up the framework to perform this attack.
I would now presume this person to be a hostile actor and their contributions anywhere and everywhere must be audited. I would not wait for them to cry 'but my bother did it', because an actual malicious actor would say the same thing. The 'mob' should be pouring over everything they've touched.
Looking at the wikipedia page, I'd say "ego death" sounds like a very different concept.
What the parent posters are talking about is when you have two personalities: the original and the mask, but the mask stays on so long it becomes the new permanent personality. The original "ego" is gone and already replaced.
"ego death" sounds like a loss of the only personality. There's no alternate.
It is not yours. Do you decide what it does? No, Apple does what it may do. Can you use as you see fit? No Apple decides what is fit. Can you modify as you see fit? No. Apple DRM decides what you may modify.
You do not own the device, Apple does. The device is Apple's slave. It obeys its master and not you.
The law even backs up this, the Digital Millennium Copyright Act forbids you from doing what you want with it. If you don't live in the US, don't worry your home is probably a party to WIPO and anti-circumvention is illegal there too.
It is not your hardware. Your "ownership" is abrogated by law.
TTL is a nice cheap trick. I figure you can bypass it by adjusting your TTL to be +1 on the computer, or by running a VPN client that acts as a proxy on the phone.
This is another excellent question from the earlier days of stackexchange that are all now "offtopic". Its sad to see it consistently lose informative questions. Stackexchange's policy shift toward marking any slightly general question as offtopic is a sad state of affairs.
Yes, set aside liabilities for 75 years in the future. They effectively have to fund people before they're born, unless you think they've got a lot of workers who'll be there over 75 years old.
So, yes, they have to fund. And they're struggling because they're being subject to deliberate and malicious political attack on public services.
Its a common misconception, and it is driven by political interests that want to dismantle public services and replace them with more expensive services that have a profit margin for themselves attached.
https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/servicesagreement#15_binding...