> But so far, I have resisted the notion of having cameras all over the place, peering inside the home's interior spaces. Sure, I have some Ring devices guarding the front of the house, but there's nothing recording inside.
> I live in a gated community with only one way in and out, and I'm alerted immediately if someone should be let through if they aren't on my regular list.
The whole tone of the article as I read it was Security & Privacy for me, not for thee (people in my community, my dogs, my hypothetical kids).
> The kernel community has surprisingly few rules regarding the addition of new features like io_uring. ... there is nobody with a checklist making sure that all of the relevant boxes have been marked before a new subsystem can be merged.
This is such a stark difference from the big tech company I work at where there are checklists from the security, privacy, performance, and maintenance teams that have to be satisfied before features can be launched.
Drat, I wish I could edit; I meant deals negotiated off platform.
My understanding is it's potentially illegal [1] to pay someone to post and not tag it as being an advertisement. Instagram added new transparency guidelines [2] that require sponsored posts to be created inside their platform [3]
Instagram (Facebook) updated their rules in 2016[1] demanding that off platform deals for sponsored content go through them so they get a cut. Sounds like the exact same situation; You aren't allowed to make money via Ads without paying the platform our "fair" cut. News articles suggest Some of this was FTC compliance but Facebook also wanted their cut.
> Ads as a whole probably gets bucketed into goods and services outside the app (because it doesn't improve your app experience).
Kinda funny because these companies run around claiming ads are good for your user experience (via 1. funding the free experience, 2. platitudes like "connecting you with high quality offers")
> I live in a gated community with only one way in and out, and I'm alerted immediately if someone should be let through if they aren't on my regular list.
The whole tone of the article as I read it was Security & Privacy for me, not for thee (people in my community, my dogs, my hypothetical kids).