> vs. words that concisely warn colleagues that something is going beyond political ideology and towards a pattern of racially-motivated behavior that places people in grave danger, we haven't learned our lessons from history.
Don't the more radical leftist circles fit exactly this description, except that they just paint a different racial group as the enemy?
Linus' use of explicit language was exactly something that should be used as an example. He rarely attacked people, but instead attacked the actions that they did or ideas that they had.
First impressions matter mostly to those who are influenced by them. Many scams have been successful because of exactly that.
A stupid name might do well on search engines for example (as in, those names could be easily searched)
Furthermore I don't really consider the name to be stupid. I don't quite really know of many other ways of succinctly highlighting resilience as a property in a name.
I don't believe violence should be justified, one way or another.