This sounds interesting, though I'm not quite grokking the vertically sliced modules aspect. Maybe you could explain it a bit more in detail, or link to some diagram or code repo, would be awesome.
When you say imperitave shell, am I correct in interpreting this shell to be the external interfaces to other systems - both incoming and outgoing eg api and dB layers? At this juncture you'd then take the data and process it in the domain core functionally? It seems like a plausible solution but it is not purely functional which leaves my question open.. How does one do it purely functional?
By going "more functional" with the free monad and effect system approach, do you mean the Result design pattern as seen in rust and F#?
If you have any working example I can dig in to that would be welcome
How does one actually architect a functional service, regardless of language? Is it a traditional 3 tier approach with controller, service persistence or something more... Functional?
And uh, you're leaving out probably the most important reason - being a good software engineer is a skill. Why shouldn't we be compensated for it? People think you can just go ahead and read a medium article and blend in to the industry. Those guys are bottom rung hires. Top software devs worked their asses off to carve out a career and deserve every penny they earn.
I have no issue with people whom create podcasts. You're asking the wrong questions and making the wrong assumptions. One has to wonder about your own shortcomings and sidestep this discourse. Thanks for your (lack of) input.
No I meant Lex Fraudman. Hotz is good in my book, the guy can actuary write code an has pulled sonys pants Down in a major embarsment for them. Kudos to hotz
He is shilling for the tesla. Non of his research is worth the paper it's written on. He has no solid acediemia and he oversells his weak ties to MIT via marketing which is build on lies. Do the research, there's plenty of content online about this guy, and the rest of the Rogan network shilling people out of their cash.
Lex kisses rogans ass hard because he knows its going to get him more followers he can exploit.
On a personal level, I find lex to be dull and offer little to no insight in the tech realm. Just another dude who got on board the AI hype train and is trying to ride it into dollar bill land at the expense of people who lack critical thinking abilities when it comes to this kind of stuff. An endorsement is not always a true seal of quality.
Edit - let's not forget the censorship an blocking people on twitter. Lex is a shill.
Credentials? Lex has no such thing. Hes an imposter leveraging his association with MIT. His work was never peer reviewed and he shills for tesla. When he was called out on this he started to sensor people on twitter for highlighting these facts. Lex is a fraud. I can't believe how easily some people are duped into belief. But then I remember Joe rogan probably has the biggest podcast flowing on earth.