Not true. Ideas are always great when they stay in your head. If you have a big ego and low self esteem they might even be the best thing since sliced bread. Without execution however, they are useless and not proofed to be even average. Everyone has ideas, because they don’t require hard work or thought
There are better ways to socialize and watching television should be the last one. Talking with other people about movies and television shows is superficial and won’t help in bonding with them, because your personality lacks depth.
I don’t agree. Watching tv and browsing social media just temporarily heightens the mood, but then tampers of very quickly. That time could be spend doing something useful like following a hobby, because that increases overall happiness.
Find ways to sustain and improve your mental health. The future will get only more stressful and the thing between your ears will largely determine if your life is well lived or not. So far I have seen three areas that you should really look into. Sleep, meditation and exercise. In that order. They all do one thing well and that is to reduce stress and increase your resistance to stress. All other areas in your life will improve, but it’s a slow process which results are only visible after roughly two months of consistent effort.
The point is that looking at artificial intelligence like this is naive. There are some things Actor systems excel, but fail at others. There are some things NN can do pretty well, but suck at others.
Comparing humans to all applications of AI is naive and no definitive answer can be given, because it really depends. I think that this will be the status quo in the future.
I don’t think we can replicate this state solely with current electric components. What is way more interesting would be the connection of human nerve tissue and computers.
Don’t want to drag down the enthusiasm, but we really should distinct between data analytics, actor systems, etc. and of course „artificial intelligence“.
There is also no evidence that consciousness can be emulated on machines. Before we don’t even understand how the brain functions and creates consciousness, we aren’t really smarter than fifty years ago. Until then we just created machines that can find optimized patterns in highly abstracted actions of humans. Yes, Stockfisch can beat you at chess, but you can’t ask it what the difference between poker and backgammon is. Currently there doesn’t exist a general artificial intelligence.