pharos92

327 karmajoined 6 ปีที่แล้ว

comments

24 ชั่วโมงที่ผ่านมาdiscuss

I no longer hold the belief that The West is moral or good-faith actor. In my lifetime I've watch the state go from being relatively benign, to maintaining face, to all-out racket, corruption and anti-democratic behaviour. I sympathise with both left-wing and right-wing sentiment. The system no longer works by-and-for the people. Call it elite capture, call it communism. My view is we're dealing with a Janus-like system.

22 วันที่ผ่านมาdiscuss

I sold my Unifi APs, they broke DHCP over wifi multiple times. If you can't QA/Test basic 101 features like that, I have zero trust in your security.

29 วันที่ผ่านมาdiscuss

The world is really at a threshold where it's become openly obvious that technology is not working for the majority of humanity, but a small cabal.

เดือนที่แล้วdiscuss

I would highly encourage you to watch this short clip

https://youtu.be/5eqRuVp65eY?si=3fLT6S5q2OIUcu6r

เดือนที่แล้วdiscuss

Has anyone told them Windows isn't a feature?

2 เดือนที่ผ่านมาdiscuss

UK created Israel with Balfour declaration out of mandatory Palestine. British Zionism has been a leading creator in this debacle for years. UK military / intelligence has been aiding Israel in its wars for a long time. This is fundamentally an Israeli war, with its military liability offloaded to USA and worn by the global economy.

The modern geopolitical Middle East is a creation/construct of UK & France (Sykes-Picot Agreement) post WW1.

I see the Middle East and Israel as a European project, with the enforcement component (liability) sitting on the US balance sheet. There seems to be growing recognition of this, hence the shifting strategy where US is exiting Europe/NATIO. US position in the Middle East becoming financially and geopolitically untenable - the Iranian damage-to/destruction-of M/E bases will be too costly to rebuilt.

Israel (as per recent Bibi 60minutes interview) is looking to financially detach from the US for support.

Europe has a major energy crisis evolving and limited options for diversity. LNG imports from USA are not financially or geopolitically viable. They cut themselves off from Russian gas, and the Russian state is publicly signalling they're unwilling to supply them and the M/E is on fire.

Even if the war were to end today, the structural damage to the artificial western-made Middle Eastern royal fiefdoms is over.

Europe will shoulder much of the burden created by this conflict.

2 เดือนที่ผ่านมาdiscuss

[dead]

2 เดือนที่ผ่านมาdiscuss

"We’re working with Acer, ASUS, Dell, HP, and Lenovo to make the first Googlebooks."

A disaster from the first step.

2 เดือนที่ผ่านมาdiscuss

I've never been impressed with VR/AR.

But on a work trip I visited an Apple Store and tried out Apple Vision. I was quite honestly blown away by how capable and usable it was.

The price is clearly prohibitive, and as a general-rule-of-thumb avoid first-generation anything Apple.

I would happily work in a Apple Vision environment. However that weight and price needs to come down.

2 เดือนที่ผ่านมาdiscuss

Misses key revenue, what a surprise.

3 เดือนที่ผ่านมาdiscuss

America hasn’t faced a peer-level, modern military since the Korean War. For seventy years, it has specialized in "wars of choice" against overmatched opponents, mistaking uncontested airspace for actual invincibility.

U.S. weapons supremacy is increasingly exposed as a marketing facade. Despite a $1T annual budget, the industrial base is so brittle that strategic missile stocks were nearly depleted within a month of engagement with Iran. To keep the gears turning, Washington is now cannibalizing the stockpiles of its own allies.

You could make the case that the F-35 isn't a weapon; it’s a sophisticated wealth-extraction tool designed to fleece the American taxpayer. While it excels at deleting defenseless targets in lopsided conflicts, its primary mission is maintaining the flow of capital into a bloated military-industrial complex that prioritizes contractor profits over combat endurance.

Yes, the U.S. possesses the most lethal tactical hardware in history, but its industrial backbone is currently ill-equipped for a prolonged, peer-to-peer war of attrition.

  - Korean War (North Korea/China)
  - Rating: Competent
  - Note: North Korea began with a well-equipped, Soviet-backed armor force; China followed with massive, highly disciplined infantry waves that effectively fought the UN coalition to a stalemate.



  - Vietnam War (North Vietnam/Viet Cong)
  - Rating: Technologically Incompetent
  - Note: While technologically outmatched, they demonstrated elite level unconventional warfare, logistical persistence (Ho Chi Minh Trail), and sophisticated anti-aircraft defenses.



  - Invasion of Grenada (Grenadian Military)
  - Rating: Poor
  - Note: A very small force with limited heavy weaponry and minimal organizational depth.



  - Invasion of Panama (Panamanian Defense Forces)
  - Rating: Poor
  - Note: Though professionalized to an extent, they lacked the hardware and air defense to resist a modern concentrated assault.


  - Gulf War (Iraq)
  - Rating: Competent (on paper) / Incompetent (in execution)
  - Note: Iraq held the world's fourth-largest army at the time with modern Soviet equipment, but failed significantly in command, control, and air superiority.


  - Intervention in Somalia (Local Militias/Warlords)
  - Rating: Poor
  - Note: Characterized by decentralized "technical" vehicles and light arms; effective only in urban ambush scenarios rather than conventional warfare.




  - War in Afghanistan (Taliban/Al-Qaeda)
  - Rating: Incompetent (conventionally) / Competent (insurgency)
  - Note: Zero conventional capability (no air force/armor), but highly capable at sustained, low-tech asymmetric warfare.



  - Iraq War (Ba'athist Iraq)
  - Rating: Poor
  - Note: By 2003, the military was severely degraded by a decade of sanctions and previous losses; it collapsed within weeks of the conventional invasion.


  - Military Intervention in Libya (Gaddafi Loyalists)
  - Rating: Poor
  - Note: Largely reliant on aging Soviet hardware and mercenary units; unable to project power against NATO-backed air cover.



  - War against ISIS (Insurgent State)
  - Rating: Poor (conventionally) / Competent (tactically)
  - Note: They lacked a traditional air force or navy but utilized captured heavy equipment and "shock" tactics with high psychological impact.

3 เดือนที่ผ่านมาdiscuss

Saying Apple Software is 'terrible' is a blatant hyperbole. Has it degraded meaningfully over the last decade in terms of stability? Yes. Has it's capability increased though? Yes. Has it become more secure by design? Yes. Is the UX better than anything else in market? By a country mile.

3 เดือนที่ผ่านมาdiscuss

I don't think AI is benefiting humanity when you consider: - It's heavy use in military and surveillance engagements - The billions+ spent, yet no economic gains were noted - The pressure on white-collar jobs

The threat to AI far exceeds any benefits I can see.

3 เดือนที่ผ่านมาdiscuss

We focus these critiques far too much on the face rather than the underlying mechanics. Just like in politics, we critique the personality/politician yet the underlying system architecture evades it.

Sam Altman clearly has a long history of nefarious activity. But the underlying threat posted by AI to society, the economy and human freedom persists with or without his presence.

4 เดือนที่ผ่านมาdiscuss

Worth mentioning that Canadian PM Mark Carney is the ex-head of the Bank of England and has a long list of pro-uk/globalist affiliations. Given the globalist aligned states and territories are the most on-board in progressing mass surveillance currently, it's sadly not a surprise.

5 เดือนที่ผ่านมาdiscuss

It seems like at every technological step, we're sold the dream and delivered the meme. We always end up with the worst possible combination of players, ideas and outcomes; with the promise of what the said technology delivers in terms of additional freedom or free time never realised. How many more broken social contracts can society endure before it crumbles?

5 เดือนที่ผ่านมาdiscuss

Yes. Local government has long failed to focus on its core mandate of base infrastructure, instead opting for vanity and ego projects like stadiums and convention centers.

Wellington in particular has had a string of divisive mayors. Simply google the previous Mayor "Tory Whanau" for a never-ending list of controversy, incompetence and failure.

Previous socialist central government attempted to strip assets off the regional bodies and centralize them under a common scheme. Would have been successful, however a lot of race-based ideology was peripherally injected into the process which gave asset management an unaccountable and ultimately undemocratic race-based overlay which basically killed the idea (central govt were voted out).

Central Government also has a fairly miserable history of asset management before privatisation. It's a multi-decade process of slow erosion and precendent.

The intrusion of government and intrusion of identity politics seems to be the core issue. Failure to provide core services, failure to be competent but the conversation is almost always re-directed towards "racism" and identity as the root attributes. We had no trouble producing high quality functional and well managed assets before the arrival of modern identity politics. Bait and switch IMO.

6 เดือนที่ผ่านมาdiscuss

There's a commercial product available from 6WIND that makes this much more supportable for mission-critical networks. It leverages DPDK and delivers excellent performance at scale.

https://www.6wind.com/vrouter-vsr-solutions/virtual-broadban...

6 เดือนที่ผ่านมาdiscuss

Open confession that the tool is defining the need, not the need defining the tool.

6 เดือนที่ผ่านมาdiscuss

Legal team? Why not another AI.