No, it's about protecting women's sex-based rights. Having every point in the declaration enacted in law and policy would abolish no-one.
Men could still claim to be women and present themselves in a feminine manner if they so desire. There's nothing to prevent their freedom of belief and freedom of expression. The difference is that this wouldn't entitle them to access female spaces, and indeed would not grant them any special privileges under the law.
This isn't abolition, just like separation of church and state doesn't abolish religious folks, with them being free to practice their beliefs within their own communities of like-minded people. Same principle should apply to 'gender identity' beliefs.
If you disagree, please cite those parts of the declaration that you believe shows otherwise.
https://twitter.com/genericeddie/status/1659081857793769472
https://web.archive.org/web/20060115061830/http://www.rollin...