They could make all e2ee chats, group chats. Where instead of a 1-1 chat between two people or many-many chat between a lot of people, they do 1-1+1 or many-many+1, where the +1 is the government. Technically the underlaying company or anyone else still won't have access to messages and e2ee won't be "broken", except for the fact that there's one more party in the key exchange.
Or they scan at the edge on the user's device.
Either way, both are very prone to false positives and and very much privacy invading.
What if you build a p2p video conferencing app with user controlled co-ordinator "server". Server in quotes, because maybe iroh works through the browser?
Their point is that OP used the same dot separated phrase to point out that there's a 0.8GB model and an audio/image model on device. Which reads weird.
Location: Portugal
Remote: yes
Willing to relocate: unlikely, depends what's being offered
Technologies: JS/TS ecosystem, serverless AWS and GCP, React temporal, a few SQL and nosql DBs, generally not bad at devops fullstack
Résumé/CV: will send via email
Email: [email protected]
Do it like plane tickets do, tie a ticket to an identity + buyback up to a week or so before the concert in case someone wants to cancel (or authorize the transfer and capture only a week before). Ask for ID and ticket at the entrance.
I don't think it's the need for management that makes devs not start a new company, it's the huge amount of money and connections needed. You don't need someone managing you to get connections and money, you just need the connections and the money.
Your point turned from "here are some examples" to "here's a sample of one". And that "one" is so different, society wise, from all the other ones that I'm not sure is useful here other that "if you live in a society like this that's just starting to massively produce world wide in this sector other than a brand or two they were doing before, then maybe there can be no union workers compared to the other companies that have been producing world wide for decades across multiple models and brands"
I agree with you. Putting myself in the shoes of a tech CEO, I see other companies laying off and saying that their AI strategy made them so productive that they don't need 20% of their employees anymore, I see investors flocking to that company, I look at my company and feel investor FOMO, I layoff as well.
It's nothing personal, it's just how the US works. If this were to happen in Europe, your company would burn to the ground. The amount of compensation you'd have to do would eat your gains from the layoffs.
> From everything we’ve seen, Pawel’s code is a legal third-party tool that is covered under open source software licensing, and in no way has he “impersonated” Bambu Labs or presented as them at any point.
The name of the software literally has "BambuLabs" in it. Not picking sides, but that's pretty dumb.
Also cease and desist are "easy" to handle, just host your code on a European git hoster or host your own gitlab/codeberg. That USA law doesn't affect EU platforms.
Or they scan at the edge on the user's device.
Either way, both are very prone to false positives and and very much privacy invading.