looking at the section preceding that it appears it was uncovered in the same forensic investigation. So according to the complaint both were discovered at the same time.
> By way of example only, Talton sent or received messages that include the terms “jungle n***s” and “gross lesbians,” “butterfaces,” “rape,” “big rubber dog dick,” “pathetically obsessed pussy slave,” phrases such as “women don’t experience pain the way humans do,” “I’m never going to get to pin you down and fuck you again, am I...you know how hard I get when you humiliate me,” “now i have to jerk off before my meetings start” in addition to sending links containing explicit and misogynistic pornography.
This is what really irks me about take home exercises. The candidate spends 2-4 hours (or 12 and say they did it in 2) and the interviewer has no real commitment to reading and understanding it. 10 minutes to review the code? I would expect a video call where we go over the code together.
All interviewing I do, I do while talking to them and give them ample time to explain it back to me.
The candidate is investing their time. You should have enough respect to invest your time too.
In most functional languages using list indices are an anti-pattern. Pattern matching and generalized iteration is a much more elegant way to handle most things you would use an index for.
That comment honestly makes me really sad. People would rather put a criminal in the white house and have her run free because she is the "lesser of two evils".
Regardless of whether or not she is guilty, that flow of logic is deplorable and anyone who follows it is only contributing to the the problem of crooked politics. God damn American politics is fucked up.
I don't see why it is confusing that applications for high concurrency would solve problems differently than big data.
I am also an Erlang noob, but I don't think pattern matching has to account for all parameters. To my understanding erlang pattern matching is very efficient, and anything you would pattern match on function parameters, you would have to do some type of logic in the function if you had no pattern matching, so I don't see how pattern matching would negatively effect performance.
ETS tables to share data between threads actually make a lot of sense if you think of your program with the idea that no matter what "x" is, this process should properly handle it, because you can't guarantee when the message you sent will be processed.
An ETS table is a DB, but you can replicate it by having a single genserver hold that data, and use calls to retrieve and manipulate it. It gives you one spot for your data to be. If you had that same data in messages or function call stacks, by the time the process executes it, it could be stale.
Its useful if you need one "true source" of individual pieces of data that needs to be synchronized. Its about decoupling data from processes.
Past past California ave about 2 miles near el camino. It was a little over 2 miles to California Ave and maybe 2 miles to the san Antonio shopping center. They weren't pleasant walks the most direct way (along el camnino) and even longer if you decided to take the scenic route and everything is spread out.
Not an impossible feat to bike, but the energy is low and there are much better ways to spend rent money.
Yeah. In Palo Alto my crappy 1 bedroom apartment that I was living in 3 years ago was in the middle of suburban jungle (no restaurants or shops for a few miles in any direction) and was $1650. I looked last week and it was $2500. That was a crappy place.
If you want to live by downtown PA (university Ave) its right around $2800-3000 for a 1 bedroom, for places with 20 year old appliances and no upgrades.
The peninsula is just as bad because of school preferences, etc.
New engineers getting hired in MV and PA literally can't afford to live by themselves in a 1 bedroom. That is fucked.