> GPT‑5.6 is priced per 1M tokens across three model sizes: Sol is $5 input / $30 output; Terra is $2.50 input / $15 output; and Luna is $1 input / $6 output.
Just as expensive as Fable 5. But of course, another slot machine upgrade but the costs will keep going up and the open weight models from china will continue to race everyone else to $0.
Looking forward to the next version of GLM, Qwen, Deepseek and Minimax.
This is quite an interesting read from Andrew's perspective. But one line tells me everything I needed to know.
> The blog post is expertly written. It's almost like the marketing department of a trillion dollar company has a lot of money riding on this article.
Even Andrew knew that this was going to be Anthropic's marketing opportunity for AI to rewrite Bun from Zig into Rust. This post from Jarred says it all. [0] If you have access to hundreds of billions worth of resources (infinite tokens and compute), they don't care what others think and some relationships are just cheap to discard.
Like I said before in [1] and [2], Bun (now Anthropic) does not care about you. They did this to market the capabilities of their AI models and this rewrite was an example of that in broad daylight. Even if Zig allowed AI generated contributions, this move was going to happen anyway.
I cannot believe that many commenters in [0] at the time did not see that this rewrite was eventually going to happen.
In your "opinion". So are you going to stop people from making "overdone" jokes on this site or others using variations of it from now on? Or is it only mine?
My link suggests that is it just a joke and it is fine if you do not get it.
> Fortunately the site is right next to the title, and so HN regulars can see it's a Simon Willison post about it.
With exactly the same title? Regardless it isn't the original post and that is what most are here for. I am just saving them a click to go to the source article.
> And like many expect, it isn't merely reporting, but offers interesting thoughts on it, including some not in the HN discussion you mentioned.
It is reporting on the blog itself. In fact, the whole post could have been a comment under the actual post in [0] where the comments shows more than one perspective. That goes both ways.
But it is far more better to have lots of other commenters telling us what they think with the full context of the article, rather than just one perspective with tiny excerpts from the source.