HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

sandwitches

no profile record

comments

sandwitches
·2 ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
[dead]
sandwitches
·2 ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
[dead]
sandwitches
·2 ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
[dead]
sandwitches
·2 ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
[dead]
sandwitches
·2 ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
[dead]
sandwitches
·2 ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
[dead]
sandwitches
·2 ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
[dead]
sandwitches
·2 ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
[dead]
sandwitches
·2 ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
[dead]
sandwitches
·2 ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
This particular brand of Hackernewsian condescension is unreal. I'd be amazed if it weren't so depressing. Please don't belittle someone's very real grievances like this, thank you.
sandwitches
·2 ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
Because AI bullshit is ruining everything we've ever loved?
sandwitches
·2 ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
Here's a good rule of thumb: any time you try to undo a billion years of evolution, there will probably be unintended side effects. Go to bed.
sandwitches
·2 ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
Shhh, you said the quiet part out loud!
sandwitches
·2 ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
If you're kidding, it's not funny. If you're serious, that's a joke.
sandwitches
·2 ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
Google "filibuster" and "US Senate", and then maybe you'll understand why your statement is in bad faith.
sandwitches
·2 ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
You don't find it a little unfair that doing something the government makes you do is so Byzantine and fraught with error that there is an entire cottage industry around doing it? When the only reason it's so awful is because of policy choices largely out of our control?

What if we deliberately slowed your car down, threw our hands up because "it is what it is", and then said you could fix it by paying $500? Wow, we solved the problem!
sandwitches
·2 ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
Will they cover the fee for the accountant to fix their own mistake?
sandwitches
·2 ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
It's almost like it's intentional.
sandwitches
·2 ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
I shouldn't have to explain why this isn't a viable long-term solution, right?
sandwitches
·2 ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
I see several massive I-beams in your argument that are buckling due to a lack of support. Mind shoring them up with sources, boss?