slyfox125 · HackerTrans

4 เดือนที่ผ่านมาdiscuss

For those who are only familiar with Linux (or Windows): don't relegate yourself to any one system. FreeBSD has its benefits and so does Linux (and Windows, though that shrinks by the day - and MacOS). Use the best tool for the job at hand and enjoy things for what they are. Personally, I find enjoyment and usefulness in all of them (BSD, Linux, Mac, Windows), and use them all regularly (daily to weekly).

slyfox125

5 เดือนที่ผ่านมาdiscuss

Perhaps the initial posts spurred reader interest in FreeBSD which then spurred further posts?

FreeBSD is great - good to see it get positive "airtime."

slyfox125

5 เดือนที่ผ่านมาdiscuss

It looks great using Plasma. If the comparison and "problem" is the lack of a "ribbon" menu, etc., then you are missing the whole point of Office alternatives: they are free, open source, but most importantly, they are usable. That is, they do not eschew usability and function for the sake of change, pure aesthetics, or a company's latest foray into some new gimmick.

Ultimately, the "classic" approach taken is because many users feel that the classic style is more usable and makes them more productive irrespective of their learned habits of the past 20-30 years.

slyfox125

6 เดือนที่ผ่านมาdiscuss

Fooyin is great. For those spoiles by foobar2000, there are no alternatives.

slyfox125

6 เดือนที่ผ่านมาdiscuss

The typical touted benefit is the native first-party ZFS support.

slyfox125

7 เดือนที่ผ่านมาdiscuss

You believe it is irrelevant - I believe it is relevant. I argue matter itself has more basis in reality in that it cannot be as easily explained away as time. In the context you're speaking in, there is much more evidence and logic to support the existence of matter. My point is that time as we believe it exists, is a construct that has meaning to us because of its benefit to our survival, rather than it being an objective reality.

slyfox125

7 เดือนที่ผ่านมาdiscuss

How do you know anything outside of your perception is true? All things boil down to a philosophical argument. The simplest answer is that "time" as we imagine it is a product of our interpretation and the true nature of "it" is hidden from us.

slyfox125

7 เดือนที่ผ่านมาdiscuss

We understand "time" in the context that we must: to subsist in order to procreate. The extent it exists outside of our own perception as we imagine it does, is debatable. Ultimately, time is our sensory interpretation of the world around us to facilitate our survival and thus, we may never make sense of it outside the constraints it exists within.

comments