t0rakka · HackerTrans

ปีที่แล้วdiscuss

What do you mean and? The implications are implicit; any vulnerability will be unpatched, so bad actor (tm) has to know only ONE vulnerability after XP support was ceased. If he has means of talking to the machine through TCP/IP or UDP he will have 100% guaranteed access.

You wouldn't believe how much traffic is hammering IP ranges with known vulnerabilities. Forward port 22 to your Linux box or similar, check the logs for number of "connection attempts", it's going to be glorious log. A-HOLES of this planet are doing this just to get control of devices connected to the internet, if for no other reason than use them in DDoS-for-hire service. If there is a quick buck to be made.. they'll be all over it. Human parasites.

t0rakka

5 ปีที่แล้วdiscuss

I wrote a small test bench for my own uses as wanted to compare with different codecs and see how "raw compression" would work, how would QOI+ZSTD combination work and so on.

Here's example output..

  image: 1502 x 1800 ( 10560 KB )
  ----------------------------------------------
           encode(ms)  decode(ms)   size(KB)    
  ----------------------------------------------
  qoi:          31.2        21.6       2452  
  qoi+zstd:     46.7        19.3       1832  
  zstd:         47.4         8.7       2742  
  lz4:          14.1         3.0       4108  
  png:          92.4        18.0       2795  
  zpng:         24.1        13.3       1394  
  jpg:           2.7         1.8        517  <-- lossy
  webp:        199.6        19.1        227  <-- lossy

comments