It is very much NOT limited to public figures and is pervasive in large companies. Individuals get effectively blackballed because of disagreeing with the mob
Talking about should is well and good so long as we remember that many things which have been implemented with the intent of helping ended up being very bad
Because publicly funded universities hold different ethnicities to different standards which favor particular underrepresented groups simply due to their group identity rather than to a consistent, objective standards.
I asked because the response to that question helps me understand w the point of view one is coming from
> Dating when you're older is already difficult so making it even more difficult isn't exactly great.
Honestly 50 people have given this similar vibe. You people make it seem like someone has a gun to your head, forcing you to use a dating app. There are alternatives. It's a free market. If you don't like something, don't spend money on it.
I'm not going to walk you through reading comprehension, but if you can't recognize the oozing underlying sneer of that quote and the blatant cherry on top finish, then I encourage you to work on that skill
No. You provide examples of why you think Snopes is worthy of believing.
There is no reason to believe them simply due to the fact that they are posited as an unbiased site.
They present information in bad faith then contradict themselves on the exact same page in the explanation of their claim to validity.
Burden of proof is on he who makes an outrageous claim, so by all means feel free to state your case as to why you think a particular, clearly untrustworthy website, is worthy of trust
I can copy and paste the entire thing again if you'd like to see the part which is very clearly not being straightforward. I'm not sure how one could read that text and not recognize the dishonesty oozing out of every sentence.
> Donald Trump is such a good President that he is best friends to the superior China (Peoples Republic of).”