HackerTrans
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

tigershark

no profile record

comments

tigershark
·3 เดือนที่ผ่านมา·discuss
China never threatened this: "A whole civilization will die tonight, never to be brought back again.". Also China never announced that it was going to attack Europe. I trust them much more compared to a malignant narcissist that doesn't care if the whole world burns now that he doesn't have much left to live.
tigershark
·3 เดือนที่ผ่านมา·discuss
Suddenly burning up the quota ~4x faster than usual is not a mess up in your opinion?
tigershark
·3 เดือนที่ผ่านมา·discuss
Claude Code cache is not 1 hour. There is a "Closed as not planned" issue in GitHub that confirms that it has been moved to 5 minutes since March: https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/issues/46829. I started seeing the massive degradation exactly on the 23rd of March, hence after a few days I unsubscribed because it was completely unusable, with a ~5h session being depleted in as little as 15-20 mins.
tigershark
·3 เดือนที่ผ่านมา·discuss
If you are speaking about the world, hundreds of millions in the next 5 years is probably closer to reality in my opinion. And from your question I think that you already know the answer.
tigershark
·3 เดือนที่ผ่านมา·discuss
What change did you release on March 23rd when the subscription limits collapsed and they are still way down compared to what they used to be?
tigershark
·4 เดือนที่ผ่านมา·discuss
How many humans have been born until now and how many Einsteins have been born? And in how many hundreds of thousands of years?
tigershark
·7 เดือนที่ผ่านมา·discuss
What about NVDA (~$4.5T) and AVGO (~$1.8T)?
tigershark
·8 เดือนที่ผ่านมา·discuss
How much more was worth USD at the beginning of the year?
tigershark
·9 เดือนที่ผ่านมา·discuss
Flux kontext quality is noticeably worse that nano banana, Qwen image 2509 and Seedream 4 most of the times. For pure image generation instead Hunyuan image is scarily good.
tigershark
·9 เดือนที่ผ่านมา·discuss
Seedream 4 is better than nano banana on average, so that test result seems accurate to me
tigershark
·2 ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
As I said, o3 demonstrated field medal level research capacity in the frontier math tests. But I’m sure that your use cases are much more difficult than that, obviously.
tigershark
·2 ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
Where is the plateau? Chatgtp 4 was ~0% in ARC-AGI. 4o was 5%. This model literally solved it with a score higher than the 85% of the average human. And let’s not forget the unbelievable 25% in frontier math, where all the most brilliant mathematicians in the world cannot solve by themselves a lot of the problems. We are speaking about cutting edge math research problems that are out of reach from practically everyone. You will get a rude awakening if you call this unbelievable advancement a “plateau”.
tigershark
·4 ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
Proof of stake is useless. It just give all the powers to the current stakeholders. So it’s not trustless by definition since you need to trust the stakeholders.
tigershark
·5 ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
If you really work hard at your day job you just don’t have enough energy at the end of the day if you have also a family to care about. It’s a great advice for when you are young, it’s pretty much useless when you value the time that you spend with the people that you love much more than any amount of money.
tigershark
·7 ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
If the metric for success is revenue then, no, they are not by any sensible measure super successful. Their revenue combined it’s a small fraction of search/ads.
tigershark
·8 ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
It’s not really that difficult once you have worked on many, many different systems. When I start a new job (on average less, and sometime much less, than every two years for the joy of all the people here that would never, ever hire me because I change jobs too much) I ask for a complete overview of the architecture in case of server side work and for the gui I just start digging in the code while waiting for the visual Studio installation. Once I have visual studio / Idea I start immediately working on some high priority isolated work while continuing to explore how all the pieces fit together. At this point I realise if there is something that is obscure or that I don’t understand and ask questions. The important thing is probably to first try to understand how it works by yourself and only after some effort ask for clarifications. Normally by the time I finish the first two-three bits of work I already have an idea of some improvement that can be done on a bigger scale to make the coding more productive (it’s easy to find, when you feel pain while implementing something it means that there is space for improvement). At that point usually I start working on the smallest improvement that gives the biggest return in parallel while implementing the next required functionality. At the end everyone wins. The users will have the functionality requested because I implement it, although a bit more slowly compared to working only on that. I have the opportunity to play with the system improving it and I learn something new. In my current job I’m quite lucky because in my role I’m dispatched to different teams that need help to deliver high priority releases. In this way I can work in different systems without changing job.
tigershark
·8 ปีที่แล้ว·discuss
Unless your system is much bigger than 1M LOC I seriously doubt that an experienced good programmer will need more than one year to understand it. It never took me more than one month to understand a system, even when I was junior and when the system was > 1M LOC.