HackerLangs
TopNewTrendsCommentsPastAskShowJobs

tinyhouse

no profile record

comments

tinyhouse
·7 วันที่ผ่านมา·discuss
Are we talking about online chess cheating? Aren't players eventually need to show up and play in-person?
tinyhouse
·8 วันที่ผ่านมา·discuss
This is so well written. Well done!
tinyhouse
·25 วันที่ผ่านมา·discuss
Cursor is great but they're all going to cash out and leave SpaceX as soon as they can.
tinyhouse
·28 วันที่ผ่านมา·discuss
At least on Claude Code it's completely useless. It tells me to run all the commands myself cause it's blocked ("Classifier's blocking me again" lol). Just tried now and saw the msg: "There's an issue with the selected model (claude-fable-5[1m]). It may not exist or you may not have access to it. Run /model to pick a different model."

I really have no clue how Anthropic released this thing without doing any real testing. I did use it on claude.ai with no issues; talking just for code.
tinyhouse
·29 วันที่ผ่านมา·discuss
This is very true and applies for everything in life.
tinyhouse
·เดือนที่แล้ว·discuss
I try to always buy tickets on TickPick when I can (no affiliation). No fees and total prices are often much better than Ticketmaster. But my usecase is almost always buying from resellers. I never up-to-date to buy official tickets.
tinyhouse
·2 เดือนที่ผ่านมา·discuss
Drew is clearly a very competent engineer who built an amazing product and company. He was the right person to build it from zero all the way to an IPO, but wasn't the right person to keep scaling it. Dropbox's product vision in the last 10 years was lacking to say the least. Their latest innovative product "Dash" is another flop, like Dropbox Password, Paper, and many others.
tinyhouse
·2 เดือนที่ผ่านมา·discuss
False is too strong. Biased information is more appropriate.
tinyhouse
·2 เดือนที่ผ่านมา·discuss
OpenAI and Anthropic are both private companies with lots of individual investors such as employees, secondary-market buyers, and so on, who stand to become multi-millionaires. So most of what you read about them here is probably colored by someone's financial interests. Not that it's gonna make a difference, but people are just being people.
tinyhouse
·2 เดือนที่ผ่านมา·discuss
Looks nice but seems overkill to me to run a Go server to sync with a telegram bot to authenticate. Maybe I don't fully understand the use case.
tinyhouse
·3 เดือนที่ผ่านมา·discuss
They own the best models and will probably keep owning the best models for a while. They have much more compute now and more data to keep improving their models on many tasks. Open source won't close the gap in 6 months. They are also trying to block other companies from distilling their models [0].

[0] https://www.anthropic.com/news/detecting-and-preventing-dist...
tinyhouse
·3 เดือนที่ผ่านมา·discuss
Pi is my preferred coding agent and I'm happy it lands in good hands. At this point the only reason to use CC is access to Opus. I think open source will end up winning the coding agents race among developers at least. We just need a 30B size model with Opus like capabilities for coding. Frontier labs will dominate the Desktop / Web.
tinyhouse
·3 เดือนที่ผ่านมา·discuss
I highly recommend everyone to use Pi - it's simpler and better harness. The only tricky part is that moving forward you cannot use the Claude subscription to access Opus. But for many tasks there are enough alternatives.
tinyhouse
·3 เดือนที่ผ่านมา·discuss
I really started to like Pi. That's unfortunate that I won't be able to use it with Opus (way too expensive without a subscription). I'm optimistic that open source coding models will be able to keep up. AI is too important, we're shooting ourselves in the foot if we don't adopt open source tools and models. The more adoption the better it will become.
tinyhouse
·4 เดือนที่ผ่านมา·discuss
A lot of these ideas Dspy and RLM (from the same people IIRC) are more marketing than solving a real problem.
tinyhouse
·4 เดือนที่ผ่านมา·discuss
That's going to happen in all of big tech (already happening at Amazon and Microsoft). These companies have too many employees. It was never really justified and with AI even more so. I've been in big tech and directors often tell everyone to hire when they can rather when they need. For example, if they know a hiring freeze is coming, they will try to hire as many people as they can before it happens. It's rare to find people in big tech where their incentives align with the company. (and the blame is not always on the people themselves)

As for Meta, I give Mark credit for trying, even if he failed so far with all the VR stuff. The main disappointment is about Llama cause it's clearly an execution problem. With Meta's investments in AI throughout the years, not being able to compete with Anthropic and OpenAI is a big failure.
tinyhouse
·4 เดือนที่ผ่านมา·discuss
Israel and the US completely control their airspace and Iran's entire navy got demolished. I think the US prefers not to got too far as they prefer to keep the negotiation talks open. According to reports they asked Israel not to target energy for example.
tinyhouse
·4 เดือนที่ผ่านมา·discuss
Less people visit the US because it's do damn expensive. That's the biggest reason for most people. Most people don't have any principles, they go where they can afford. Last year I was in NYC and Miami beach and was shocked how expensive everything was. (I know these are expensive places but that's where most tourists go - they don't visit Kansas)
tinyhouse
·4 เดือนที่ผ่านมา·discuss
AI made juniors without potential useless, not all juniors.
tinyhouse
·5 เดือนที่ผ่านมา·discuss
Yes, they depend on AWS for compute and Amazon also owns a big chunk of Anthropic (it used to be close to 30%, probably less now with the recent raises). I think it's a good partnership since for the most part they focus on different things and I don't see Anthropic going after AWS - they are an AI company first and foremost. Amazon has their own AI stuff for enterprise but no one uses it so I don't think they take it seriously. They know they cannot compete here.

I think that OpenAI and Microsoft is a more challenging partnership with much more overlap.