I built a tiny website back in 2005-ish to aggregate RSS feeds from sites that I was interested in. Just for myself and didn't think too much that it could have been an actual product. That was before Google Reader launching in October 2005. Today it's sad to see Google Reader discontinued.
Somehow I find this article very interesting in that it's kind of a sandwich that the promotion of Feedly is inserted in the middle, which makes me wonder if the article really wants to advocate the revival of RSS, or is just another marketing one. Does anyone have the same feeling here (confusing face)?
Edited: fixed a typo: Google Reader launched in October 2005.
"Note that any purchased Rebtel credit will expire after twelve (12) months of inactivity."
I'm one of their customers. My credit is gone without any reminders or notification. I have been left in dark until I tried to use the service yesterday and found out that my credit is gone. The credit is literally my money.
Alright, this is really funny. Do 10 people each with 4-year experience really add up to "40-year experience"? I don't think so. I think this is just kind of a joke.
What would you think if Google (now Alphabet) said their management team had over 100 years of experience? (not carefully calculated, but you can do the math if you like :))
They should be more honest than using such gimmicks.
"Mgt Team has over 40 yrs experience managing wireless stores"
Seriously, 40 yrs of wireless store management?? Was there any consumer facing wireless service back in 1976? I'm confused.
As far as this article says,
(http://mashable.com/2014/03/13/first-cellphone-on-sale/#QX95...), the first cellphone on sale was in 1984 and it cost $3,995. I wonder if there were already "wireless stores" that needed to be managed whatsoever at that time.
My point is: they shouldn't ONLY plan on ensuring recovery occurs fast; they should also plan on having multiple data centers, which to me is more important. It's frightening to know that such an important service is only operating in a single data center.
However, their recovery report didn't mention anything about such a plan.
Sounds good but still not convincing. For example, R can do the same thing, too, or even better. And it can be integrated with other programming languages. I would never buy it either until somebody really shows it's worth the money.
Somehow I find this article very interesting in that it's kind of a sandwich that the promotion of Feedly is inserted in the middle, which makes me wonder if the article really wants to advocate the revival of RSS, or is just another marketing one. Does anyone have the same feeling here (confusing face)?
Edited: fixed a typo: Google Reader launched in October 2005.