> "the effect of the Pandora Papers is to, deservedly, trash a suite of non-US tax havens"
> "Who benefits? The US and the Big Four"
I'm a bit confused as I read this article as my understanding was that the Pandora Papers, for once, shed light on how the US is becoming the place of choice for the super rich seeking to escape taxation:
It would be wise to support https when publishing content that may be security sensitive. Both OP's site and the site used for the extension run on http.
It may be useful to remember that the author lives in France and has spent his whole professional life in France.
As a French having worked in Germany, Canada and New Zealand, I can say that the recruitment process is very different in other countries, where side projects and open source contributions are really valued.
In my opinion, his article should mention the geographical setting of his experience, and his advice should only apply to people living in France (and writing the article in French may have been more appropriate too)
> "Who benefits? The US and the Big Four"
I'm a bit confused as I read this article as my understanding was that the Pandora Papers, for once, shed light on how the US is becoming the place of choice for the super rich seeking to escape taxation:
https://www.theguardian.com/news/2021/oct/04/pandora-papers-...
https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/interactive/2021/boo...
Not sure exactly how these revelations "benefit the US"?