> Ember has always been driven by the idea that web apps are becoming more and more like native apps over time.
Well, this is what people keep telling again and again, as if it was enough to repeat it to make it real, but I still have to see one web application that I would prefer to use over a desktop one.
Sure, we have hugely complex webapps, but the browser is a really a shitty environment to think of it as a "platform" to do anything else than to read documents.
Are you a human or a corporation? Because if you are a human it should be a matter of common sense to see that it is quicker and more effective to regulate the emissions with a law instead of hoping that enough good willed people take their time and start boycotting every single company that does not care about the environment.
This is no "blaming" it's an assessment of the most polluting companies in the world, and given that the one of the goals for the future is to reduce emissions worldwide they will bear a great responsibility to do so. Or are you proposing that we should just let go on as usual?
One nice thing of the internet is that it forces openness and rewards it.
If some site goes behind a paywall, what it really does is to remove itself from the internet, giving more visibility opportunities to people who want primarily to communicate and share ideas, instead of strategically monetizing content (or whatever it is called today).
Also, the author is doing some confusion on who feels entitled =)
Wow, who could have ever imagined that a fake operating system that in reality was a mobile browser supporting "applications" written in html, css and javascript was going to miserably fail?
Well, this is what people keep telling again and again, as if it was enough to repeat it to make it real, but I still have to see one web application that I would prefer to use over a desktop one.
Sure, we have hugely complex webapps, but the browser is a really a shitty environment to think of it as a "platform" to do anything else than to read documents.