macOS Ventura is now available(apple.com)
apple.com
macOS Ventura is now available
https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2022/10/macos-ventura-is-now-available/
518 comments
I am ethically obliged to supplement my original summary
[hours later]
-Ha ha just kidding of course there's a feature tour do you want to see it now
Hmm OK
-Have you ever wished I was a phone? (8 slides)
Really? Let's have a talk about Preferences
-They are Settings
OK, let's have a talk about Settings
-NoI do wish I could put a SIM card in my Macbook and not have to buy a phone.
You are asking for an iPad.
Oh but if you want to make calls with it you will need an iPhone. That's just them maximizing revenue, I guess.
It's incredibly annoying that I can't make a phone call with my cellular equipped iPad.
This prevents me from buying an iPad mini.
it is incredibly stupid that they did this, but i guess it does force you to buy both an iPad and iPhone?
it is incredibly stupid that they did this, but i guess it does force you to buy both an iPad and iPhone?
Everyone still has a phone, and it doesn't force me to buy an Apple phone, it just means the iPad is worth less to me. I'm left stuffing around with Skype or some other horrible voip system because Apple don't like the look of a phone icon on an iPad -- even if you're using AirPods!
Apple could probably build an iPhone/iPad with an M1 CPU and allow you to 'do it all' on the single device.
I really hope one day my phone can also be my day-to-day computer. That would be so cool!
I really hope one day my phone can also be my day-to-day computer. That would be so cool!
Well, iGoggles are coming soon.
> Um preferences
-Oh hai I'm called Settings now and I reorganized everything
Oh good. I find it by typing "settings" 100% of the time because I can never remember what it's called ("System Preferences", evidently) but that works less-well than it might since that's not the name—it doesn't fully match until I've typed the whole word.
Oh good. I find it by typing "settings" 100% of the time because I can never remember what it's called ("System Preferences", evidently) but that works less-well than it might since that's not the name—it doesn't fully match until I've typed the whole word.
I’ve used macs since system 7 and it went from oh I know what to click to basically me typing in the search bar for what to find.
I gave up a while ago trying to remember in which preference pane each setting was. There are just too many buttons that are moved every other version. I cannot live without Spotlight in system preferences.
I gave up when a bunch of easily-accessible settings for mouses/mousepads/keyboards went to the "Accessibility" pane. It was annoying to see the Accessibility pane become a catch-all pane for power-user features...
iOS does this too. Why is disabling "Tap to wake" in the Accessibility settings? That should be with the Display or Lock Screen settings.
They made it so "user-friendly" it is no longer user-friendly.
MacOS X peaked in being user friendly with Tiger.
I vehemently disagree, Snow Leopard was the champion.
Fellow Snow Leopard fan here. Best version of any OS, ever, in my estimation.
+1
I wasn’t even on a Mac at the time but I was highly impressed by it. I modded the hell out of Windows to match SL visually.
I’m looking forward to the next SL release, assuming it ever happens.
I wasn’t even on a Mac at the time but I was highly impressed by it. I modded the hell out of Windows to match SL visually.
I’m looking forward to the next SL release, assuming it ever happens.
+1... And the last one without cloud pushed down your throat
I was a college student the time and decided to spend hundreds of dollars on the SSD upgrade (going from 500gb HDD to 128gb SSD) for my Macbook Pro. Best decision ever. It was amazing to see the machine booting completely to the desktop in under 10 seconds, not even my M1 MAX MPB boots that quickly.
Snow Leopard ruined things. Tiger was the best. /s
(Get off my lawn)
(Get off my lawn)
In recent years I've been using the search bar a lot anyway, since the modal nature of the old System Preferences app wasn't great for quickly checking through several settings screens. And I often forget where some settings are — the taxonomy is not always so clear.
The new Settings app seems like an improvement to me. The vertical list of settings categories is easier to quickly scan, and it remains visible all the time. That alone is a great improvement, and makes it quite a bit easier to navigate the (huge) list of available settings.
The new Settings app seems like an improvement to me. The vertical list of settings categories is easier to quickly scan, and it remains visible all the time. That alone is a great improvement, and makes it quite a bit easier to navigate the (huge) list of available settings.
>The new Settings app seems like an improvement to me.
While using Gnome's style for the settings application is a huge improvement, the implementation is laggy and doesn't scroll smoothly. And it takes a while for each Stack item to load and render when it's selected. x86_64 here.
While using Gnome's style for the settings application is a huge improvement, the implementation is laggy and doesn't scroll smoothly. And it takes a while for each Stack item to load and render when it's selected. x86_64 here.
Yeah, the items could load more snappily. On my M1 there's a delay (0.2 – 0.5 seconds?) between clicking an item and it showing up — enough to make it feel annoyingly laggy.
I haven't used Gnome in decades. To me it looks just like the iPad Settings app, or iPhone's in horizontal mode.
I haven't used Gnome in decades. To me it looks just like the iPad Settings app, or iPhone's in horizontal mode.
Now I have to rewrite my automator script for dealing with the bug where macos keeps forgetting to put my external monitor into 144 Hz mode.
Would you be so kind to share that script?
I haven't got around to re-writing it yet. Here's the version that used to work in Monterey: https://gist.github.com/perryizgr8/d3fdb67f0c0884ecd713ddd41...
I got a Windows PC for the first time in over a decade recently and I cannot understand why MacOS updates are so damned slow
Because on newer Macs, it’s rewriting the whole OS partition with a new firmware image, much like iOS and IPSW files.
Windows, on the other hand, generally does incremental upgrades.
Windows, on the other hand, generally does incremental upgrades.
That doesn't imply it should be slow; that should imply it should be fast.
At least, given that macOS is using a copy-on-write filesystem such that you can share blocks between multiple volumes/snapshots — which it is; and that the OS base-image is a sealed "everyone has the same cryptographic checksum" volume — which it is; and that Apple are using a binary-diff-based "create aside" OS-image update process, like ChromiumOS/CoreOS — which they are. They should only have to write out disk pages for the changes, and then just link the existing pages in to form the rest of the extents. Like a `btrfs receive`.
But for some reason, despite all that fancy tech, it's still slow; and the install process still requires rebooting into a separate Recovery OS to do parts of the installation. Which, given the "create aside" part especially, is just ridiculous. You should be able to just run the installer in the background as you're using your device, and eventually be told "when you reboot, it'll be into the new OS."
At least, given that macOS is using a copy-on-write filesystem such that you can share blocks between multiple volumes/snapshots — which it is; and that the OS base-image is a sealed "everyone has the same cryptographic checksum" volume — which it is; and that Apple are using a binary-diff-based "create aside" OS-image update process, like ChromiumOS/CoreOS — which they are. They should only have to write out disk pages for the changes, and then just link the existing pages in to form the rest of the extents. Like a `btrfs receive`.
But for some reason, despite all that fancy tech, it's still slow; and the install process still requires rebooting into a separate Recovery OS to do parts of the installation. Which, given the "create aside" part especially, is just ridiculous. You should be able to just run the installer in the background as you're using your device, and eventually be told "when you reboot, it'll be into the new OS."
"when you reboot, it'll be into the new OS."
Oh man, wouldn't that be amazing!
NixOS then lives in the future, as that is exactly what it does!
Pff, FreeBSD and Illumos/Solaris have BE's (boot environments) since years
Can you give your system’s declarative configuration to another machine and boot into an equivalent one? :D
Yes.
With FreeBSD I can 'send' entire BE to other system and boot it there - which I often do.
Just use:
Hope that helps.
With FreeBSD I can 'send' entire BE to other system and boot it there - which I often do.
Just use:
# zfs send <ZFS-BE-DATASET@snap> | ssh <IP> zfs recv <ZFS-BE-DATASET>
Hope that helps.
That can't be the whole story.
If we assume the drive can write 500MB/s (conservative), and an OS install takes up 50GB of space (conservative), it should take less than 2 minutes to write the partition. Where does the other 58 minutes go?
If we assume the drive can write 500MB/s (conservative), and an OS install takes up 50GB of space (conservative), it should take less than 2 minutes to write the partition. Where does the other 58 minutes go?
I wondered the same about Linux installers. I'm installing some kind of debian minimal which will take 300 MB on disk. It should be installed in a fraction of the second. Instead it takes minutes. All installer should do is: dd pre-assembled Ext3 filesystem from ISO to disk; extend filesystem to the desired size; write some configs like fstab. It could be really fast.
My guess is that nobody really took the time to optimize it. Installation is only one-time procedure and even it if takes a hour, who cares.
My guess is that nobody really took the time to optimize it. Installation is only one-time procedure and even it if takes a hour, who cares.
What you describe is the cloud image. You can dd it to your hard drive and it should work as is (initial password will be displayed on first boot).
As for Debian, the slowness comes mostly for fsync calls I think. You should be able to use eatmydata to avoid this. See: https://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/Quicker_Debian_insta...
As for Debian, the slowness comes mostly for fsync calls I think. You should be able to use eatmydata to avoid this. See: https://people.skolelinux.org/pere/blog/Quicker_Debian_insta...
Yeah, I know, my point is that ordinary installer should do the same with ordinary installer UI rather than trying to install every deb package over and over again, running its pre/post scripts, etc. What's the point? It should be deterministic anyway.
thatd work if it wasnt for (some) settings of course. but even then, image and then update /etc and friends and done but here we are
I jumped on the upgrade bandwagon quickly this morning and the entire upgrade took about 15 minutes on my M1 MBP 13".
Presumably, you're experiencing the same download issues my work MBP is experiencing. It's been downloading for over an hour and is just barely past 50%. My Internet bandwidth is 10G real-world and un-busy, so presumably Apple's CDN is getting hit good.
Presumably, you're experiencing the same download issues my work MBP is experiencing. It's been downloading for over an hour and is just barely past 50%. My Internet bandwidth is 10G real-world and un-busy, so presumably Apple's CDN is getting hit good.
At much of it, the OS and even applications actually seem to be running. I remember a macOS update with the full-screen progress bar, where a few minutes in, a browser tab suddenly started playing music, with no way to turn it off...
Other 58 minutes is collecting telemetry
EFI updates are sometimes included with new versions of macOS.
This isn't really a viable excuse. Silverblue is also immutable and updates are applied in under 10 seconds prior to reboot (which is never affected by updates).
Coming from Windows and Linux, macOS had been a very unpleasant experience for me. It's full of papercuts.
Coming from Windows and Linux, macOS had been a very unpleasant experience for me. It's full of papercuts.
> Coming from Windows and Linux, macOS had been a very unpleasant experience for me. It's full of papercuts.
The same could be said to the opposite transition, from macOS to Linux and/or Windows. All of these OSs are mature and old enough to have thousands of papercuts different from the thousands of papercuts of the other OSs, the impression is mostly based on what you are used to.
I used to be staunchly anti-Apple/Mac up to 2010-ish, nowadays I simply can't work and feel productive with a Windows machine. Linux can be a bit more pleasant until I get to the edges of the Linux-on-desktop UX and the experience crumbles.
Windows is definitely the most unpleasant experience I've ever had on desktop OSs, and I was a user all the way from Win3.11 to Windows 7 (latest iterations only on a gaming computer though).
The same could be said to the opposite transition, from macOS to Linux and/or Windows. All of these OSs are mature and old enough to have thousands of papercuts different from the thousands of papercuts of the other OSs, the impression is mostly based on what you are used to.
I used to be staunchly anti-Apple/Mac up to 2010-ish, nowadays I simply can't work and feel productive with a Windows machine. Linux can be a bit more pleasant until I get to the edges of the Linux-on-desktop UX and the experience crumbles.
Windows is definitely the most unpleasant experience I've ever had on desktop OSs, and I was a user all the way from Win3.11 to Windows 7 (latest iterations only on a gaming computer though).
Windows' updates got much less granular since Windows 10. It used to be that updates were delivered in individual packages that can be installed and uninstalled independently (within reason).
Nowadays more and more updates come in a "rollup" package which is a bundle of many updates and it's take it or leave it. Even worse, some of the bigger feature updates are actually full OS reinstalls under the hood.
Nowadays more and more updates come in a "rollup" package which is a bundle of many updates and it's take it or leave it. Even worse, some of the bigger feature updates are actually full OS reinstalls under the hood.
It's not how old the Mac is, but rather whether its running macOS Catalina or newer when Apple switched to a separate read-only system volume:
https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT210650
https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT210650
> on newer Macs, it’s rewriting the whole OS partition with a new firmware image
TIL
TIL
Apple switched to a read-only system volume beginning with macOS Catalina, released 3 years ago.
https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT210650
https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT210650
My previous experience with Windows (~3 years ago) was that every single update took ~2 hours to complete, and they were asking to update weekly.
I used to game weekly with my friends, and because of the above problem, I would have to turn on my computer the night before and start the update so I would be able to reliably play a game the following day - otherwise, there was an extremely good chance that they would start gaming at 8pm and I wouldn't be able to join until roughly 10pm due to the Windows updates.
At the time, this was Windows 10. I eventually just switch to an old Xbox (ironically, still Microsoft), which was far more reliable (although XBox updates take forever too), because we could cross-play Apex Legends. But that is an 8 year old XBox One and it finally has crapped out on me.
I'm currently finishing up getting parts for a new PC build, which will have Windows 11, and I really dread it. I wish Apex was for Linux because I just want to have a Linux-based gaming environment.
--
Anyway - all this to say... macOS major updates might be slow, but they happen so infrequently, that it's not nearly a big deal. Minor security patches are almost never that slow for me, especially compared to Windows.
I used to game weekly with my friends, and because of the above problem, I would have to turn on my computer the night before and start the update so I would be able to reliably play a game the following day - otherwise, there was an extremely good chance that they would start gaming at 8pm and I wouldn't be able to join until roughly 10pm due to the Windows updates.
At the time, this was Windows 10. I eventually just switch to an old Xbox (ironically, still Microsoft), which was far more reliable (although XBox updates take forever too), because we could cross-play Apex Legends. But that is an 8 year old XBox One and it finally has crapped out on me.
I'm currently finishing up getting parts for a new PC build, which will have Windows 11, and I really dread it. I wish Apex was for Linux because I just want to have a Linux-based gaming environment.
--
Anyway - all this to say... macOS major updates might be slow, but they happen so infrequently, that it's not nearly a big deal. Minor security patches are almost never that slow for me, especially compared to Windows.
> My previous experience with Windows (~3 years ago) was that every single update took ~2 hours to complete, and they were asking to update weekly.
Unless you manually seek preview updates, Windows gets updates once per month, on Patch Tuesday (a twenty-year tradition now).
Two hours for "every single update" sounds implausible for Windows 10 because Microsoft has implemented changes to minimize the "offline phase" of the updates to mere minutes - even on HDDs.
Which brings to my last point. If updates were taking long, then your OS was most certainly installed on a HDD. Everyone knows HDDs are slow as hell.
Seriously, what was the point of replying with complaints about Windows on slow hardware and comparing it to mac OS on fast hardware? It almost feels dishonest.
And for the record, Ventura is installing on the Mac as I type this on my Windows machine. The 22H2 update for Windows 11 had an offline phase of under 10 minutes and I have a non-NMVe SSD here. The Mac has already been down for about 15 and it's not even done yet.
Unless you manually seek preview updates, Windows gets updates once per month, on Patch Tuesday (a twenty-year tradition now).
Two hours for "every single update" sounds implausible for Windows 10 because Microsoft has implemented changes to minimize the "offline phase" of the updates to mere minutes - even on HDDs.
Which brings to my last point. If updates were taking long, then your OS was most certainly installed on a HDD. Everyone knows HDDs are slow as hell.
Seriously, what was the point of replying with complaints about Windows on slow hardware and comparing it to mac OS on fast hardware? It almost feels dishonest.
And for the record, Ventura is installing on the Mac as I type this on my Windows machine. The 22H2 update for Windows 11 had an offline phase of under 10 minutes and I have a non-NMVe SSD here. The Mac has already been down for about 15 and it's not even done yet.
If you don’t use windows for your daily driver, then you absolutely get into this situation. Even on NVMe, rarely is a windows 10 update (still running it here) less than an hour. Then there’s connection speed. Even on a gig line you won’t get gig speeds. And again, if you’re not on it everyday then you may have to update multiple drivers and other windows updates.
> Unless you manually seek preview updates, Windows gets updates once per month, on Patch Tuesday (a twenty-year tradition now).
That's weird, there have been multiple occasions when my gaming desktop (Win10 Pro) installed updates for multiple consecutive shutdowns and I definitely haven't opted into any additional update channels. I don't use it all that often, so those were spaced out over two weeks maybe, but definitely less than a month. They tend to take quite a while for me, too, I'd say 20-ish minutes at the least? Typical minor macOS updates take less time for me (2020 Intel 13" MBP; desktop does have a NVMe SSD and is a bit older than the Macbook). At least with Windows Pro you can postpone them like on macOS, I've used Home for a bit and forced reboots mid-game are just crazy frustrating. No idea about Windows 11, my desktop apparently can't run it, which is weird, too; I thought backward compatibility was a big thing with Windows. Same with a few Windows XP era games, apparently I have to buy remastered versions, can't get the originals to run anymore.
That's kind of a theme with me and Windows; I start out expecting things to be as good or better as on macOS (their user base is massive, surely they'll polish everything really nicely), but then reality is kinda underwhelming and frustrating. If I hibernate my PC, it invariably turns itself back on at 2 AM and won't go back to sleep even if configured to. It won't do WOL no matter what I try, scanning via a HP all-in-one device requires a HP cloud account, funnels me into an ink subscription, upload scans to their cloud and then crashes mid-scan (on macOS, that "just works" via the built-in Printers and Scanners app), the bundled Office app doesn't actually have the standalone apps (need to download the "real" Office installer for those, which they tell you nowhere at all; why don't they just bundle them like the iWork apps?), ... so at this point I've simply accepted that Windows is a bit like Linux in that as a non-expert user you have to live with a couple of weird and broken things at all times, but you can save money on hardware and can get setups Apple doesn't sell (like a comparatively inexpensive gaming desktop, though my desktop wasn't exactly cheap either). If I could have modded PC games on a more console-like platform, I'd probably move my gaming there.
That's weird, there have been multiple occasions when my gaming desktop (Win10 Pro) installed updates for multiple consecutive shutdowns and I definitely haven't opted into any additional update channels. I don't use it all that often, so those were spaced out over two weeks maybe, but definitely less than a month. They tend to take quite a while for me, too, I'd say 20-ish minutes at the least? Typical minor macOS updates take less time for me (2020 Intel 13" MBP; desktop does have a NVMe SSD and is a bit older than the Macbook). At least with Windows Pro you can postpone them like on macOS, I've used Home for a bit and forced reboots mid-game are just crazy frustrating. No idea about Windows 11, my desktop apparently can't run it, which is weird, too; I thought backward compatibility was a big thing with Windows. Same with a few Windows XP era games, apparently I have to buy remastered versions, can't get the originals to run anymore.
That's kind of a theme with me and Windows; I start out expecting things to be as good or better as on macOS (their user base is massive, surely they'll polish everything really nicely), but then reality is kinda underwhelming and frustrating. If I hibernate my PC, it invariably turns itself back on at 2 AM and won't go back to sleep even if configured to. It won't do WOL no matter what I try, scanning via a HP all-in-one device requires a HP cloud account, funnels me into an ink subscription, upload scans to their cloud and then crashes mid-scan (on macOS, that "just works" via the built-in Printers and Scanners app), the bundled Office app doesn't actually have the standalone apps (need to download the "real" Office installer for those, which they tell you nowhere at all; why don't they just bundle them like the iWork apps?), ... so at this point I've simply accepted that Windows is a bit like Linux in that as a non-expert user you have to live with a couple of weird and broken things at all times, but you can save money on hardware and can get setups Apple doesn't sell (like a comparatively inexpensive gaming desktop, though my desktop wasn't exactly cheap either). If I could have modded PC games on a more console-like platform, I'd probably move my gaming there.
This is very well written.
This whole "tribalism" nonsense over companies is just insane. If you like windows, great. If you like MacOS, great.
I don't get why people feel a personal attachment to things like which OS they use. What really confuses me is when they become unpaid advocates for their company of choice?
Personally, I've never been a big fan of Microsoft and used Ubuntu/Mint for many years. Recently i moved to MacOS.
None of this has caused me to develop some sort of personal attachment with what OS I use. I'm not going to spend my time doing as the OP did - write a dishonest review to flog my OS of choice.
PS. I do have a windows laptop which i haven't used in months. I used it last week and it did take a while to upgrade as there were many missing updates. I also upgraded my pc from Monterey to Ventura. Both took around the same time so i really dont get the OP's point?
This whole "tribalism" nonsense over companies is just insane. If you like windows, great. If you like MacOS, great.
I don't get why people feel a personal attachment to things like which OS they use. What really confuses me is when they become unpaid advocates for their company of choice?
Personally, I've never been a big fan of Microsoft and used Ubuntu/Mint for many years. Recently i moved to MacOS.
None of this has caused me to develop some sort of personal attachment with what OS I use. I'm not going to spend my time doing as the OP did - write a dishonest review to flog my OS of choice.
PS. I do have a windows laptop which i haven't used in months. I used it last week and it did take a while to upgrade as there were many missing updates. I also upgraded my pc from Monterey to Ventura. Both took around the same time so i really dont get the OP's point?
This is not tribalism. I’m detailing a history of why I stopped using Windows, because the updates were frustratingly annoying.
If it wasn’t every week, it certainly felt like it - perhaps it was every other week. But it’s not dishonest to claim that Windows updates took up far more time than macOS updates. If I update my Mac twice a year, but Windows has to update bi-weekly (or monthly, as the person responded to me claimed is the only possible way), that is still several hours more time dedicated to Windows updates overall.
Additionally I can go far longer without updating my Mac - I’m not sure if there was a setting for this on Windows, but their updates seemed more-or-less forced.
—-
It’s interesting you believe someone to have had a negative experience with Windows to be a dishonest experience.
If it wasn’t every week, it certainly felt like it - perhaps it was every other week. But it’s not dishonest to claim that Windows updates took up far more time than macOS updates. If I update my Mac twice a year, but Windows has to update bi-weekly (or monthly, as the person responded to me claimed is the only possible way), that is still several hours more time dedicated to Windows updates overall.
Additionally I can go far longer without updating my Mac - I’m not sure if there was a setting for this on Windows, but their updates seemed more-or-less forced.
—-
It’s interesting you believe someone to have had a negative experience with Windows to be a dishonest experience.
> This is not tribalism.
Sure it is.. this whole "i'm an apple user and you are a windows user" is tribalism.
Try spending some time on any discussion boards and read the blatant misinformation floating around.
> It’s interesting you believe someone to have had a negative experience with Windows to be a dishonest experience.
I stopped using windows personally around the Windows NT days, mostly because the negative experiences so i absolutely can believe the negative experiences.
Anyhow..
MacOS isn't updated as infrequently as you state:
# ProductID Version Build Post Date Title
1 061-26578 10.14.5 18F2059 2019-10-14 macOS Mojave
2 061-26589 10.14.6 18G103 2019-10-14 macOS Mojave
3 041-91758 10.13.6 17G66 2019-10-19 macOS High Sierra
4 041-88800 10.14.4 18E2034 2019-10-23 macOS Mojave
5 041-90855 10.13.5 17F66a 2019-10-23 Install macOS High Sierra Beta
6 061-86291 10.15.3 19D2064 2020-03-23 macOS Catalina
7 001-04366 10.15.4 19E2269 2020-05-04 macOS Catalina
8 001-15219 10.15.5 19F2200 2020-06-15 macOS Catalina
9 001-36735 10.15.6 19G2006 2020-08-06 macOS Catalina
10 001-36801 10.15.6 19G2021 2020-08-12 macOS Catalina
11 001-51042 10.15.7 19H2 2020-09-24 macOS Catalina
12 001-57224 10.15.7 19H4 2020-10-27 macOS Catalina
13 001-68446 10.15.7 19H15 2020-11-11 macOS Catalina
14 071-78704 11.5.2 20G95 2021-08-18 macOS Big Sur
15 002-23589 11.6.1 20G224 2021-12-01 macOS Big Sur
16 002-42341 11.6.2 20G314 2022-01-14 macOS Big Sur
17 002-57023 11.6.3 20G415 2022-01-26 macOS Big Sur
18 002-65695 11.6.4 20G417 2022-02-17 macOS Big Sur
19 002-77154 11.6.5 20G527 2022-04-11 macOS Big Sur
20 012-08272 11.6.6 20G624 2022-05-24 macOS Big Sur
21 012-42714 12.5 21G72 2022-07-28 macOS Monterey
22 012-40387 11.6.8 20G730 2022-07-28 macOS Big Sur
23 012-51693 12.5.1 21G83 2022-08-24 macOS Monterey
24 012-40494 12.6 21G115 2022-09-20 macOS Monterey
25 012-38280 11.7 20G817 2022-09-20 macOS Big Sur
26 012-92138 13.0 22A380 2022-10-24 macOS Ventura
27 012-90254 12.6.1 21G217 2022-10-24 macOS Monterey
28 012-90253 11.7.1 20G918 2022-10-24 macOS Big Sur
And as someone who hasn't used windows in literally MONTHS.. you can postpone their updates...
Sure it is.. this whole "i'm an apple user and you are a windows user" is tribalism.
Try spending some time on any discussion boards and read the blatant misinformation floating around.
> It’s interesting you believe someone to have had a negative experience with Windows to be a dishonest experience.
I stopped using windows personally around the Windows NT days, mostly because the negative experiences so i absolutely can believe the negative experiences.
Anyhow..
MacOS isn't updated as infrequently as you state:
# ProductID Version Build Post Date Title
1 061-26578 10.14.5 18F2059 2019-10-14 macOS Mojave
2 061-26589 10.14.6 18G103 2019-10-14 macOS Mojave
3 041-91758 10.13.6 17G66 2019-10-19 macOS High Sierra
4 041-88800 10.14.4 18E2034 2019-10-23 macOS Mojave
5 041-90855 10.13.5 17F66a 2019-10-23 Install macOS High Sierra Beta
6 061-86291 10.15.3 19D2064 2020-03-23 macOS Catalina
7 001-04366 10.15.4 19E2269 2020-05-04 macOS Catalina
8 001-15219 10.15.5 19F2200 2020-06-15 macOS Catalina
9 001-36735 10.15.6 19G2006 2020-08-06 macOS Catalina
10 001-36801 10.15.6 19G2021 2020-08-12 macOS Catalina
11 001-51042 10.15.7 19H2 2020-09-24 macOS Catalina
12 001-57224 10.15.7 19H4 2020-10-27 macOS Catalina
13 001-68446 10.15.7 19H15 2020-11-11 macOS Catalina
14 071-78704 11.5.2 20G95 2021-08-18 macOS Big Sur
15 002-23589 11.6.1 20G224 2021-12-01 macOS Big Sur
16 002-42341 11.6.2 20G314 2022-01-14 macOS Big Sur
17 002-57023 11.6.3 20G415 2022-01-26 macOS Big Sur
18 002-65695 11.6.4 20G417 2022-02-17 macOS Big Sur
19 002-77154 11.6.5 20G527 2022-04-11 macOS Big Sur
20 012-08272 11.6.6 20G624 2022-05-24 macOS Big Sur
21 012-42714 12.5 21G72 2022-07-28 macOS Monterey
22 012-40387 11.6.8 20G730 2022-07-28 macOS Big Sur
23 012-51693 12.5.1 21G83 2022-08-24 macOS Monterey
24 012-40494 12.6 21G115 2022-09-20 macOS Monterey
25 012-38280 11.7 20G817 2022-09-20 macOS Big Sur
26 012-92138 13.0 22A380 2022-10-24 macOS Ventura
27 012-90254 12.6.1 21G217 2022-10-24 macOS Monterey
28 012-90253 11.7.1 20G918 2022-10-24 macOS Big Sur
And as someone who hasn't used windows in literally MONTHS.. you can postpone their updates...
Did you have an SSD on your PC ~3 years ago? I never found it to be that bad or for it to take that long!
I kicked off the Ventura update today on the M1 Pro, went out to get lunch, it had finished by the time I got back.
I've been on the 'insider preview' track on Windows 10 and 11 for around 18 months. You get big updates maybe 2-4 times per month and they do take around 20 minutes to install.
Stick on the regular updates track, make sure you get an SSD, and your new Windows 11 experience will be fine just fine :) Check out WSL too, it is pretty good. I'm split on Linux vs Windows vs MacOS for development, it's all a game of tradeoffs. The trick is to have a few computers!
I kicked off the Ventura update today on the M1 Pro, went out to get lunch, it had finished by the time I got back.
I've been on the 'insider preview' track on Windows 10 and 11 for around 18 months. You get big updates maybe 2-4 times per month and they do take around 20 minutes to install.
Stick on the regular updates track, make sure you get an SSD, and your new Windows 11 experience will be fine just fine :) Check out WSL too, it is pretty good. I'm split on Linux vs Windows vs MacOS for development, it's all a game of tradeoffs. The trick is to have a few computers!
I heard Apex runs pretty good on Linux via Proton
Hi guys, about MacOsVentura and ApexLegends: Is it native playable with Metal3? No Apex Legends for Windows only
Updating with Ventura now; I look to play Apex on Macbook Pro16 since 12months been lose with Geforce (cloud); is bootcamp useable now with Apple chip?
Let me know if you can provide key for this ; seson 15 coming soon and havent played the 14 only got BP, pseudo Jiemx lvl 500+(2400 reset)
Update MacOsV 30mins up and running
also what you think of Apex mod scripts legits; is it of use? anyone up to scripts for stocks markets or what thread for it (on trading view?
Update MacOsV 30mins up and running
also what you think of Apex mod scripts legits; is it of use? anyone up to scripts for stocks markets or what thread for it (on trading view?
I'll be honest, I couldn't parse most of what you said, but I can at least confirm that there is no Bootcamp on Apple silicon, Apple didn't port it. So if you depend on Bootcamp for gaming, I fear you're out of luck on recent Macbooks.
ProtonDB has it listed as "GOLD", so yep:
https://www.protondb.com/app/1172470
https://www.protondb.com/app/1172470
Ooooh! I haven't checked on Proton in some time but this is exciting news! I'm going to check this out, thanks!
I also had this issue. You can easily solve the problem by disabling the Windows update service in Services.msc.
Windows does frequent incremental updates and makes them pretty painless, but has a bad habit of just letting the installation files pile up and fill your storage. If you or your PC supplier have the habit of having a small-medium boot disk (or partition) for just your OS and applications this can yield unwelcome surprises.
Windows updates when you don't want it to and does that often. Tons of horror stories out there. macOS updates much less frequently and never "surprises" you (at least it hasn't done to me)
There doesn't seem to be a good reason for the slowness, but a reasonably good technical write-up on the update mechanism is available at [0]. The time spent rebooting does seem excessive, especially when using image-based updates.
[0] https://eclecticlight.co/2022/03/19/explainer-macos-updaters...
[0] https://eclecticlight.co/2022/03/19/explainer-macos-updaters...
This is only about 5-10 minutes on modern hardware. Historically a lot of developers saw it as slow because it moved the contents of /usr/local in a naive loop which meant that systems using something like Homebrew spent 90% of the total time moving a million files one by one.
Wait until you buy a NOS Windows PC for the first time. I had a T495 take nearly two hours to run all updates in. About 20 minutes of that was it fannying around working out what to do.
My MBP took 10 mins to update earlier. That's fine.
My MBP took 10 mins to update earlier. That's fine.
Last time I checked the logs after an update, what I understood had happened was that the installer was installing the new files one by one, and logging each one of them. Which is a lot of files. I've no idea if this is still done this way, but I suspect it's part of the reason for the slowness.
updates are fast but downloading takes longer to complete
Strange. I started the update, had breakfast and after saying no to analytics could get back to work with everything looking basically the same. Yes, there are a boatload of new things. No, they don't pop up in your face and force you to change how you work.
I did the upgrade without issues but when it rebooted the final time it signed me on and automatically started everything I had running before and I didn't even realize it had completed until I checked the OS version in the about. Probably the least noticeable difference in OS upgrades in a while.
People like to complain, don't they? I let it upgrade while having dinner. When I came back I had forgot about the upgrade and was surprised that my background changed!
You forgot the part where macOS "restores all the windows", which it never gets right, so you get pop-ups from Notes, Maps, Music, etc. telling you at the same time "Here's what's new".
Plus if any audio was playing, it attempts to resume it during the final restart even though you can't mute it for several minutes since it is finally into the user login.
[deleted]
5 reboots to update?
So that’s why parallels kept throwing up the password screen while updating the last beta. I guess the VM can’t autologin and I was about to give up thinking it was permanently stuck in reboot
So that’s why parallels kept throwing up the password screen while updating the last beta. I guess the VM can’t autologin and I was about to give up thinking it was permanently stuck in reboot
.0 OSX releases have been hairy for as long as I can remember. There was one a few years back that spammed security pop ups
Countless person-years of engineering effort, and Spotlight is still mostly useless.
All I want is to hit Command-F to quickly search the filenames in the current folder (not start a sluggish scan of my entire hard disk). There used to be workarounds for this, but then they removed "Find by Name..." from Finder just to make our lives harder. Does anyone know a workable alternative?
All I want is to hit Command-F to quickly search the filenames in the current folder (not start a sluggish scan of my entire hard disk). There used to be workarounds for this, but then they removed "Find by Name..." from Finder just to make our lives harder. Does anyone know a workable alternative?
Finder -> Preferences -> Advanced.
When performing a search:
Search the current folder
When performing a search:
Search the current folder
If you have a setup script add the following to set this automatically:
defaults write com.apple.finder FXDefaultSearchScope -string "SCcf"I'm interested in what you mean by "setup script" - I assume you have a script of some sort you run when / if you re-install the OS? I'd love to hear more about this!
I have a simple shell script that does a bunch of setup for me to automate things.
It grabs my dot files and restores them, installs Homebrew and a bunch of programs, restores their plists (I have backup script that backs up all their plists) and writes a bunch of macOS settings via the `defaults write` command.
I can install/wipe macOS, follow the initial setting screens then when on the desktop I just connect to my NAS, copy over one script and run it in the Terminal to get my machine setup how I like it. It isn't perfect but it does about 97% of the work for me with the added bonus that it is consistent/reproducible for the most part so avoids me forgetting to change a setting some place.
I don't go crazy with it as I don't wipe my machine often enough to justify going all out with a fully automated system. Honestly it is less to save time and more to maintain consistency and have a 'documented as code' record of my environment setup (not quite infrastructure as code levels :)
It grabs my dot files and restores them, installs Homebrew and a bunch of programs, restores their plists (I have backup script that backs up all their plists) and writes a bunch of macOS settings via the `defaults write` command.
I can install/wipe macOS, follow the initial setting screens then when on the desktop I just connect to my NAS, copy over one script and run it in the Terminal to get my machine setup how I like it. It isn't perfect but it does about 97% of the work for me with the added bonus that it is consistent/reproducible for the most part so avoids me forgetting to change a setting some place.
I don't go crazy with it as I don't wipe my machine often enough to justify going all out with a fully automated system. Honestly it is less to save time and more to maintain consistency and have a 'documented as code' record of my environment setup (not quite infrastructure as code levels :)
Look up dotfiles on GitHub - for example https://github.com/mathiasbynens/dotfiles/blob/main/.macos
Oh, my!
# Trackpad: enable tap to click for this user and for the login screen
# Trackpad: map bottom right corner to right-click
# Disable “natural” (Lion-style) scrollingTap to click is an abomination. I have no love left for Apple, but their trackpads are orders of magnitude better than anyone else's in the industry.
Have you tried using the trackpad at its default settings? They actually make a ton of sense.
Have you tried using the trackpad at its default settings? They actually make a ton of sense.
ha-ha imagine dragging things with two fingers PRESSED INTO TRACKPAD instead of beautiful (yet hidden deeply in settings) three-finger drag
this is old-lenovo-hacker style
this is old-lenovo-hacker style
I added a PR to fix rsync, mosh, and some other tools, since they will be broken out of the box.
But it seems this project has fallen behind on PRs.
If you would like to have this fix, you can do this after cloning the repo:
But it seems this project has fallen behind on PRs.
If you would like to have this fix, you can do this after cloning the repo:
git clone https://github.com/mathiasbynens/dotfiles && cd dotfiles
git fetch origin "+refs/pull/*/head:refs/remotes/origin/pr/*" && git cherry-pick origin/pr/963Agreed. Its an embarrasment.
Use Alfred; I've been using it for years (10 maybe?) -- solves this problem and is extremely useful in general
Use Alfred; I've been using it for years (10 maybe?) -- solves this problem and is extremely useful in general
Alfred (https://www.alfredapp.com/) and BetterTouchTool (https://folivora.ai/) really are two of the must-haves for every mac.
I have a lifetime/powerpack Alfred license, and i don't use it much, if at all. I have it installed, but in my experience Spotlight has gotten a lot better in recent years, at least to the point where i just use that.
My only excuse for using Alfred is Dash (https://kapeli.com/dash), which integrates with Alfred, but these days so does just about every editor i use (including Vim, Emacs and Sublime Text), so i very rarely find myself using Alfred for it anymore.
One tool i do use at lot though is Hook (https://hookproductivity.com/).
My only excuse for using Alfred is Dash (https://kapeli.com/dash), which integrates with Alfred, but these days so does just about every editor i use (including Vim, Emacs and Sublime Text), so i very rarely find myself using Alfred for it anymore.
One tool i do use at lot though is Hook (https://hookproductivity.com/).
> BetterTouchTool
Physical function keys are a must-have for every mac imo
Physical function keys are a must-have for every mac imo
BTT does work with the TouchBar, but the "Touch" in the name comes from "touchpad" since it originally was used to add various macros/gestures to the touchpad and mouse. TouchBar support was added later.
Most new Macs come with full-size function keys, including a massive escape key the same size as the tab key. (At least on the en-US layout; can't speak to others.)
Most new Macs come with full-size function keys, including a massive escape key the same size as the tab key. (At least on the en-US layout; can't speak to others.)
> > BetterTouchTool
> Physical function keys are a must-have for every mac imo
While it wasn't the case for a while, they all do now.
> Physical function keys are a must-have for every mac imo
While it wasn't the case for a while, they all do now.
TipTap mapped to ctrl+tab oh lordy
Interesting. What other gestures do you use?
I've tried to setup BTT to emulate cmd+tab with swipe right or left but it wasn't a smooth experience so I've made Touch-Tab https://github.com/ris58h/Touch-Tab
Made a mistake, I use TipTap for ctrl+tab aka switching tabs in browsers and IDE's.
Also four finger press for cmd+`
Also four finger press for cmd+`
I used Alfred for 10+ years as well, but am a recent Raycast convert. Much larger and easier to use extension ecosystem, and looks nicer too IMO.
It’s an easy configuration change to default the search to the current folder. Alfred is great on it’s own but not needed to fix this.
+1 for Alfred. Amazing software.
++2 for Alfred. AND it has plugins so you can search your Chrome or Brave tabs with Alfred as well. I just hit CMD + Shift + T and it'll search all my open tabs without the browser being in focus. I had to pay but it wasn't much. Use it everyday! https://github.com/epilande/alfred-browser-tabs
oooh, I hadn't seen that plugin before; nice
wow - how is this not the default? It's always the behavior that I expect to happen, and I'm pretty much always surprised and disappointed when it does a global search instead.
> how is this not the default?
This is just speculation, but based on a conversation with my partner, there are two types of computer users. The first group makes use of hierarchical storage, consistent naming conventions, and other organizational tricks to give them a rough idea of where any file might be. The second group has never heard the term "file systems" and just stores everything with an arbitrary name in whatever location the originating application uses by default.
The first group would prefer to search the given directory, because the supplied context (of which folder to start the search in) drastically improves/speeds search results. The second group prefers to search the entire disk, because supplying that additional context is impossible - any file might appear anywhere.
The set intersection between the first group and "people who change their default settings" is much higher than it is with the second group. Consequently, the whole disk search is enabled by default.
Additionally, given the addition of an "All My Files" view in Finder (a feature which the first group would probably find baffling), Apple may also believe that the latter group outnumbers the former.
This is just speculation, but based on a conversation with my partner, there are two types of computer users. The first group makes use of hierarchical storage, consistent naming conventions, and other organizational tricks to give them a rough idea of where any file might be. The second group has never heard the term "file systems" and just stores everything with an arbitrary name in whatever location the originating application uses by default.
The first group would prefer to search the given directory, because the supplied context (of which folder to start the search in) drastically improves/speeds search results. The second group prefers to search the entire disk, because supplying that additional context is impossible - any file might appear anywhere.
The set intersection between the first group and "people who change their default settings" is much higher than it is with the second group. Consequently, the whole disk search is enabled by default.
Additionally, given the addition of an "All My Files" view in Finder (a feature which the first group would probably find baffling), Apple may also believe that the latter group outnumbers the former.
Reminds me of this Verge article reporting that kids growing up with iPhones don’t know what files or directories are: https://www.theverge.com/22684730/students-file-folder-direc...
Very much an intentional goal of the OS when it came out, the hope being that the concepts of files and folders might never be needed. A bold move to get rid of a mental overhead for using a computer that was never natural or intuitive to non-tech users. They eventually had to back off a bit, but it’s an amazing accomplishment that most users can still use these devices as if files weren’t a thing.
How long do you think that IT professionals will need to care about hierarchical file systems?
Yeah this is true, friends that are professors say they now have to have a basic class early in the semester that explains folders, files, and other basics to students.
Funny, I'm in the first group but I'd much rather have it search everything by default: because I organize my files, if I'm searching for one that means that I don't know where it is, so I need to look everywhere.
To me this is definitely it. Using non-technical people's computers is eye-opening. Thousands of files scattered around on the Desktop, Documents, or wherever they just happened to go. Finding something in a specific directory would be a completely foreign concept.
Well, count me in the third group: I make use of hierarchical storage, consistent naming conventions, and other organizational tricks to give me a rough idea of where any file might be. I also fail miserably at it (apart from dev/programming stuff, which all is in `~/dev/<project name>`) and rely heavily on search to find anything again.
As search is fast enough nowadays with indexing, I'd rather have it search the whole disk every time than the directory I'm in just to realize I've put it someplace else.
As search is fast enough nowadays with indexing, I'd rather have it search the whole disk every time than the directory I'm in just to realize I've put it someplace else.
Funny enough, I'm in the first group but prefer Finder's default behavior for the second group.
Windows also defaults to full text file searches instead of filenames, which is super annoying when you have thousands upon thousands of documents. It's often faster to open a terminal window, type 'dir search string and open the file from the terminal.
Try everything search [0], I don't think I could use windows without it. Just search filenames, instant, whole disk.
[0] https://www.voidtools.com/support/everything/
[0] https://www.voidtools.com/support/everything/
Seconded. This is a killer app. I can't imagine using Windows without it.
Especially when global search is only ever a Cmd-Space away.
The other comments make a good point about it being optimized for dumbasses that don't even understand the basic concepts of file management.
Maybe we need a name for this behavior, I propose "idiot-driven-development".
Maybe we need a name for this behavior, I propose "idiot-driven-development".
Thanks!! Having it search my mac by default was a mild annoyance (you can click search current folder once the search starts). But this is helpful
Why isn't this the default setting? I mean, who searches their entire machine when they're inside a folder?
@hwbehrens lays out the likely reason in an earlier post
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33321978
Short answer Large number of users don’t use folders to organize their files. They just depend on searching everywhere to find files that may have dropped in any random location. Those people are less likely to find the setting that makes current folder the default search target.
Short answer Large number of users don’t use folders to organize their files. They just depend on searching everywhere to find files that may have dropped in any random location. Those people are less likely to find the setting that makes current folder the default search target.
That searches the _contents_ of the files in the current folder. I just want to search the names (the way Cmd-F works in, you know, every other application: it searches what you see in the window).
also `mdfind whatever` if you prefer the CLI
If you want by name `mdfind -name whatever`.
also fd, brew install fd
Hilarious this is not default. Thanks.
Well yes but in Ventura "Preferences" is now "Settings".
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
No they didn't. Find by Name… still exists. It's ⌃⇧⌘F (ctrl-shift-cmd-F). You might have missed it because it's a dynamic menu item (Find turns into Find by Name… once you press ⌃⇧).
Tip: Use the Help menu to search menu items. I just pressed ⌘? and typed "Find" and Find by Name… popped up.
Tip: Use the Help menu to search menu items. I just pressed ⌘? and typed "Find" and Find by Name… popped up.
Ctrl-Shift-Cmd-F? Are you forking kidding me? I know sometimes you can press Option to show secret menu items (which I bet <10% of Mac users know) but Ctrl and Shift too? So now you have to press 7 different combinations of modifier keys just to discover what menu commands are available. Just wow.
Thank you for showing me that menu command! That'll be a lifesaver going forward. Usability achieved despite Apple design, not because of it.
Thank you for showing me that menu command! That'll be a lifesaver going forward. Usability achieved despite Apple design, not because of it.
> I just pressed ⌘? and typed "Find" and Find by Name
Damn, been using macOS for 9 years now and just found out about this :o Thanks!
Damn, been using macOS for 9 years now and just found out about this :o Thanks!
The "Help" menu item is a major lifesaver and especially in complex apps (that is, those which actually take advantage of macOS' native menus, which sadly isn't a given nowadays).
For example Photoshop (and its colleagues) is darn near impossible for me to use on Windows — and at least 50% of the reason is absence of the "Help" menu search feature.
For example Photoshop (and its colleagues) is darn near impossible for me to use on Windows — and at least 50% of the reason is absence of the "Help" menu search feature.
I still wish for something like Everything on Windows (https://www.voidtools.com/)
I wrote my own solution using fd + sqlite + fzf but it's nowhere as fast as Everything, and it also requires me to focus the Terminal to use it.
I wrote my own solution using fd + sqlite + fzf but it's nowhere as fast as Everything, and it also requires me to focus the Terminal to use it.
Happy user of Finda here: https://keminglabs.com/finda/
Don't know if it works on Ventura, not upgrading until I know.
Don't know if it works on Ventura, not upgrading until I know.
Fyi, it does not work. I get this error when opening Finda on macOS Ventura 13.0 (22A380):
"This version of Finda (629.0.0+df7956) is not compatible with your operating system version (22.1.0). Press Enter to download the latest version or Command+ to quit."
EDIT: e-mailed the Developer, beta release coming tomorrow...
"This version of Finda (629.0.0+df7956) is not compatible with your operating system version (22.1.0). Press Enter to download the latest version or Command+ to quit."
EDIT: e-mailed the Developer, beta release coming tomorrow...
Thank you for sharing! Neat tool!
I continue to not understand this -- The Everything app was capable of instant search on Windows in like 2008, and yet on modern devices, with SSDs, far more RAM, and faster CPUs, I have to wait a good 2-3s for results to appear.
How did one dev managed to achieve what, apparently, no corporate entity ever has?
How did one dev managed to achieve what, apparently, no corporate entity ever has?
sometimes I think MSFT should buy Everything and replace Windows search with it. There are some plugins that use it for other file managers.
But then again, they will almost certainly screw it up, given that Windows Search still can't search my start menu reliably without pauses. And their history with acquisitions and integrating tech isn't very good.
But then again, they will almost certainly screw it up, given that Windows Search still can't search my start menu reliably without pauses. And their history with acquisitions and integrating tech isn't very good.
Things like that infuriate me and make me want to throw my laptop out of the window. There's no excuse for the start menu search not being instantaneous, but Windows isn't the only offender. Searching for an app on Android is also slow.
With Windows, it is death by a thousand paper cuts. With Linux, you might get your arm chopped off while getting every device (or sleep) to work flawlessly, but once it works, it stays working. And small things like search work like you expect them to.
With Windows, it is death by a thousand paper cuts. With Linux, you might get your arm chopped off while getting every device (or sleep) to work flawlessly, but once it works, it stays working. And small things like search work like you expect them to.
Everything is only fast because of an index, right?
How it catches all file writes to update that index near instantaneously, I have no idea.
How it catches all file writes to update that index near instantaneously, I have no idea.
Everything uses NTFS journaling as far as I know.
I actually solved that by using the native macOS fsevents API which can watch the whole filesystem for changes, and I can instantly update the SQLite db I use for the index through that.
The problem is actually enumerating and searching the whole database, that's the slow part. Right now I have over 5 million rows in it and passing the SELECT results to fzf is the slowest part, taking a few seconds at least on an M1 Max.
I'm not sure how Everything presented the results so fast, with metadata and everything.
I actually solved that by using the native macOS fsevents API which can watch the whole filesystem for changes, and I can instantly update the SQLite db I use for the index through that.
The problem is actually enumerating and searching the whole database, that's the slow part. Right now I have over 5 million rows in it and passing the SELECT results to fzf is the slowest part, taking a few seconds at least on an M1 Max.
I'm not sure how Everything presented the results so fast, with metadata and everything.
The fsevents part is interesting, didn't know that!
To your point regarding the slowness - in that case it's not really acting as an index though, is it, if you're scanning the whole list and passing it to fzf?
A proper fuzzy text search index (I think elastic and similar engines have these built-in) should yield orders of magnitude better performance.
To your point regarding the slowness - in that case it's not really acting as an index though, is it, if you're scanning the whole list and passing it to fzf?
A proper fuzzy text search index (I think elastic and similar engines have these built-in) should yield orders of magnitude better performance.
Yes, you're right. I did try Meilisearch for this but I wanted close-to-instant Smith-Waterman fuzzy searching which is why I settled on FZF.
In the end I might have to reimplement that in Swift with an always cached index and native Spotlight like search bar to really make this as easy to use as I want.
It's not practical to reach for the browser or Terminal to do this search.
In the end I might have to reimplement that in Swift with an always cached index and native Spotlight like search bar to really make this as easy to use as I want.
It's not practical to reach for the browser or Terminal to do this search.
One trick is to know that spotlight indexes content and metadata separately, and most search interfaces default to content. Typing in "README.md" in system spotlight will look for documents that contain a reference to that name, while "name:README.MD" will look for ones marked as _having_ that name.
The search interface in finder has a builder for predicates (start a search then hit the plus on the right side of the search bar). There you can start to see some of the friendly prefixes for filesystem items such as extension:, kind:, date:, tag:.
You can also see the mass of file specific metadata - like width, audio bit rate, city, genre.
I have not, however, found a handy way to translate between English description, friendly prefix, and the internal query names like kMDItemContentType.
Fun aside - some of these used to work in the Mac app store - for instance, you could search for listed applications which could open exotic document types.
The "uselessness" IMHO is mostly in that it exposes the most simplistic interface possible, and people just don't know where to go from there (other than terminal users going `man mdfind` I suppose). That gap is only widened by how different it is from other filesystem-based mechanisms for power users, which have more established commonalities like regex and filesystem globbing.
The search interface in finder has a builder for predicates (start a search then hit the plus on the right side of the search bar). There you can start to see some of the friendly prefixes for filesystem items such as extension:, kind:, date:, tag:.
You can also see the mass of file specific metadata - like width, audio bit rate, city, genre.
I have not, however, found a handy way to translate between English description, friendly prefix, and the internal query names like kMDItemContentType.
Fun aside - some of these used to work in the Mac app store - for instance, you could search for listed applications which could open exotic document types.
The "uselessness" IMHO is mostly in that it exposes the most simplistic interface possible, and people just don't know where to go from there (other than terminal users going `man mdfind` I suppose). That gap is only widened by how different it is from other filesystem-based mechanisms for power users, which have more established commonalities like regex and filesystem globbing.
I know you can specify these predicates; the problem is the absolutely terrible choice of default behaviour.
I recommend checking out Raycast as an alternative.
https://www.raycast.com/
https://www.raycast.com/
Raycast is great. imo better than Alfred. Love the menu-search functionality.
But I still use both, because Raycast doesn't support "folder search". I use folders in general because they don't change, and I usually know what I'm looking for. It (should be)/is also faster than searching all files.
When I'm looking for a file or it's contents, I'll fall back to spotlight
But I still use both, because Raycast doesn't support "folder search". I use folders in general because they don't change, and I usually know what I'm looking for. It (should be)/is also faster than searching all files.
When I'm looking for a file or it's contents, I'll fall back to spotlight
Fyi, menu search in Alfred: https://github.com/BenziAhamed/Menu-Bar-Search
I started using Alfred app recently on my work laptop. It's far superior than `Spotlight`
https://www.alfredapp.com/
https://www.alfredapp.com/
It should be embarrassing how much faster Alfred's search is. Using Alfred to just search feels like using a Ferrari to pick up groceries, but it really is just better – and has been for as long as I can remember.
Doesn't Alfred just use the Spotlight in the backend for searches?
It keeps your applications in a small (i.e fast) cache, so it's more or less instant when using it as an app finder.
I think it, yes, uses the Spotlight index for finding files, although I wouldn't be surprised if Alfred does some clever stuff on top of it too.
I think it, yes, uses the Spotlight index for finding files, although I wouldn't be surprised if Alfred does some clever stuff on top of it too.
No workaround needed, just poorly placed settings and toggles:
• Finder -> Preferences -> Advanced -> “When performing a search: Use the Previous Search Scope”
• On any Finder window, CMD-F -> Search: This Mac / [ FolderName ]
• On the loupe: “Filename” instead of “Everything”
Enjoy
• Finder -> Preferences -> Advanced -> “When performing a search: Use the Previous Search Scope”
• On any Finder window, CMD-F -> Search: This Mac / [ FolderName ]
• On the loupe: “Filename” instead of “Everything”
Enjoy
Like in a Finder window? I just start typing a filename and it jumps to the letters I typed. In the column view, you can use tab and shift-tab to switch between columns, allowing quick navigation into a directory tree. I may be misunderstanding you?
Check this: https://github.com/ospfranco/sol
Having grown tired of the design of Alfread and not wanting to commit to VC-backed Raycast, this is a nice discovery! Edit: A plugin system is on the TODO and that'd be the clincher.
I still use it as fast calculator. And sometimes it can convert units ... sometimes. That's it. I don't think it has EVERY found the file I'm looking for, but Windows search ain't much better. As someone who develops on all three OSes daily, nothing beats `find | grep` or `find | xargs grep`.
Spotlight is great for those lone cold weather nights: whenever I feel down, it will start indexing and spin up all the fans and make a lot of heat and noise, making me feel warm and loved
Personally I have Spotlight indexing completely disabled, except to index items in `/Applications` so I can use it as a quick-launcher. This was not easy to configure, and I'll probably have to do it again next time I update the OS. But it did seem to help with performance - Spotlight was often the cause of unpredictably high CPU usage spikes.
Just start typing the name. Not in the search field of Finder. You'll get focus on a file or folder that starts with whatever symbols you just typed. Very convenient and fast. Having "sort by name" by default in every folder helps a lot too.
What do you mean "still mostly useless"? Is there anything more usable on any other OS?
I moved back to Windows a couple of years back. Spotlight is the second thing I miss most from macOS, with the first being Preview.
I moved back to Windows a couple of years back. Spotlight is the second thing I miss most from macOS, with the first being Preview.
Mentioned elsewhere, Everything search by voidtools: https://www.voidtools.com. It does funky things with monitoring some component of the NTFS filesystem to maintain a up-to-date index of every filename on your computer, and makes them searchable literally as fast as you can type.
(https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33321000)
There seems to be two kind of searching people do. Some people want a search tool that searches in documents. Some people want a search tool that searches filenames.
Everything search is exclusively the second. I think I can count on one hand the number of times I've wanted to search inside documents in the last 10+ years (and for those cases, grep has worked fine, even on windows!).
For some reason, searching inside documents seems to be the default for both windows and os x search, and it's super annoying.
(https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33321000)
There seems to be two kind of searching people do. Some people want a search tool that searches in documents. Some people want a search tool that searches filenames.
Everything search is exclusively the second. I think I can count on one hand the number of times I've wanted to search inside documents in the last 10+ years (and for those cases, grep has worked fine, even on windows!).
For some reason, searching inside documents seems to be the default for both windows and os x search, and it's super annoying.
> I think I can count on one hand the number of times I've wanted to search inside documents in the last 10+ years
If you want to search documents you have created, I can imagine that you may not use the feature much. But e.g. for research papers, the downloaded copy rarely reflects the contents/authors, so it is really handy to be able to search the contents.
> For some reason, searching inside documents seems to be the default for both windows and os x search, and it's super annoying.
Weird. For me windows don't seem to search inside documents, or at least not in all documents.
If you want to search documents you have created, I can imagine that you may not use the feature much. But e.g. for research papers, the downloaded copy rarely reflects the contents/authors, so it is really handy to be able to search the contents.
> For some reason, searching inside documents seems to be the default for both windows and os x search, and it's super annoying.
Weird. For me windows don't seem to search inside documents, or at least not in all documents.
Microsoft's PowerToys has a great answer to Spotlight on Windows if you're so inclined to try it out.
[0] https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/powertoys/
[0] https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/powertoys/
>not start a sluggish scan of my entire hard disk
A Spotlight search never starts a scan of your disk. The disk is always fully indexed and returns results out of the index very fast. The only exception is typically when the system is updated (or some other big event) and it reindexes everything.
That being said, as others have pointed out, there is a setting to make a Finder window search apply only to the directory in the current window.
A Spotlight search never starts a scan of your disk. The disk is always fully indexed and returns results out of the index very fast. The only exception is typically when the system is updated (or some other big event) and it reindexes everything.
That being said, as others have pointed out, there is a setting to make a Finder window search apply only to the directory in the current window.
Basic file search is broken. Still nothing like VoidTools Everything-like SMB share indexing either. Maybe Spacedrive will have these things when released? *crosses fingers
Indeed. Also, Outloook for Mac also uses Spotlight to search emails and this seems to break for a lot of people.
The only way to fix it is to do some command line mumbo jumbo like rebuilding the Spotlight index and deleting index folders.
The only way to fix it is to do some command line mumbo jumbo like rebuilding the Spotlight index and deleting index folders.
If I'm recall correctly, it was pretty much perfect in the first few releases. It got worse and worse over the years when they added smart features.
But maybe that more nostalgia than actual memories ;)
But maybe that more nostalgia than actual memories ;)
> Spotlight is still mostly useless.
I use it all the time to run binaries. For instance, "cmd-space mail". I wouldn't know the names of the files I want to search anyway.
I use it all the time to run binaries. For instance, "cmd-space mail". I wouldn't know the names of the files I want to search anyway.
after many years I still often type "⌘space email" and find nothing.
I'm still on Monty, does this work? https://imgur.com/a/ExV2wrP
What I typically do is remove _anything_ (web suggestions, etc.) that is not related to files. Usually fixes Spotlight across the board.
Finder and File organization is the worst part of Mac experience, it's terrible - I still can't get used to it after 3 years.
Windows Explorer is so much better.
Aswell as not searching the current folder, I find it so infuriating that Save-As does not default to the Current folder, just picks a random one!!
> Does anyone know a workable alternative?
Terminal and /usr/bin/find
Terminal and /usr/bin/find
fd
https://github.com/sharkdp/fd#installation
assuming you are "in the current folder" in the terminal...
https://github.com/sharkdp/fd#installation
assuming you are "in the current folder" in the terminal...
You can just start typing in Finder, prefix search will Just Work.
You can do name:searchitem and it'll find by name.
There’s one simple solution… buy Alfred.
in Terminal:
find . -type f -name “somestring”
but yeah that seems like more typing than one might want compared to a simple text entry field in the GUI.
find . -type f -name “somestring”
but yeah that seems like more typing than one might want compared to a simple text entry field in the GUI.
For what it's worth, the terminal interface to the Spotlight database is "mdfind". It still doesn't solve GP's "only this directory" problem though.
(But your "find" will search in and below the current directory for files that exactly match "somestring".)
(But your "find" will search in and below the current directory for files that exactly match "somestring".)
>For what it's worth, the terminal interface to the Spotlight database is "mdfind".
Yeah I realize that, but find is a stronger tool for the use case because it also allows wildcards to be specified in the name.
>your "find" will search in and below
Your "mdfind" will also search in and below the current directory.
find also has -depth which can be used to tell it to search only this directory.
mdfind has -onlyin to tell it what directory to search in, but it still recurses down. Does it have an option to limit this? Please do tell.
>for files that exactly match "somestring"
Well find also allows wildcards though. So not necessarily exactly… somestring is just an example.
Does mdfind allow wildcards?
Also find is fun to combine with grep to inspect file contents, especially since it has the -print0 option…
Yeah I realize that, but find is a stronger tool for the use case because it also allows wildcards to be specified in the name.
>your "find" will search in and below
Your "mdfind" will also search in and below the current directory.
find also has -depth which can be used to tell it to search only this directory.
mdfind has -onlyin to tell it what directory to search in, but it still recurses down. Does it have an option to limit this? Please do tell.
>for files that exactly match "somestring"
Well find also allows wildcards though. So not necessarily exactly… somestring is just an example.
Does mdfind allow wildcards?
Also find is fun to combine with grep to inspect file contents, especially since it has the -print0 option…
find . -type f -name "*.py" -print0 | xargs -0 grep somestring
you could also just have find run the grep for you as well
`find . -type f -name \*.py -exec grep homestring {} \;`
mdfind searches contents by default, thanks to the Spotlight index.
My friend has some issues with using the `scp` command on Ventura to copy files to a Synology NAS.
It turns out the `scp` has been updated to use sftp protocol since OpenSSH 8.9 and Synology seems to use a different port for sftp, causing some hard to understand errors.
https://lwn.net/Articles/835962/ for context.
It turns out the `scp` has been updated to use sftp protocol since OpenSSH 8.9 and Synology seems to use a different port for sftp, causing some hard to understand errors.
https://lwn.net/Articles/835962/ for context.
"If it ain't broke, don't fix it."
This applies to Ventura, Windows 11, Android 12, and iOS 16. I tried updating to some of these, only to regret it later and downgrade.
This applies to Ventura, Windows 11, Android 12, and iOS 16. I tried updating to some of these, only to regret it later and downgrade.
This was an upstream change in OpenSSH, not an arbitrary change by Apple.
Also, scp was in fact broken, and they fixed it by changing it to use the SFTP protocol under the hood.
Also, scp was in fact broken, and they fixed it by changing it to use the SFTP protocol under the hood.
Wow, clamshell to external monitor support is vastly improved. I couldn't believe it when it happened the first time.
I have a MBA M2 going USB-C -> HDMI on a 4k Dell monitor. You can open and close the laptop and it switches the external from secondary to primary and back almost instantaneously.
I'd describe this as a major improvement over every prior MacOS.
I have a MBA M2 going USB-C -> HDMI on a 4k Dell monitor. You can open and close the laptop and it switches the external from secondary to primary and back almost instantaneously.
I'd describe this as a major improvement over every prior MacOS.
My M1 Macbook Pro did this already when I bought it last year, but it stopped working on a minor OS update. I wonder if this update will make it work again.
I updated and it does work again! Although it didn't at first when I plugged in my monitor. After about a minute the screen flickered off and on and then after that it supports the instant switch again... Strange
I think this is an Apple Silicon feature.
Did this _not_ work on the same M2 laptop while on Monterey?
(I've had this on Monterey from the beginning on M1 MacBook Pro)
Did this _not_ work on the same M2 laptop while on Monterey?
(I've had this on Monterey from the beginning on M1 MacBook Pro)
It supported clamshell and open, and has for as long as I remember.
But the toggle between the modes had been this slow experience that seemed similar in delay to switching resolutions.
Now it is this blip—-this is your main display, and you can toggle it if you rapidly open and close it, which I can’t really recommend except to cement in your mind that this is the new normal.
It seems wholly different.
But the toggle between the modes had been this slow experience that seemed similar in delay to switching resolutions.
Now it is this blip—-this is your main display, and you can toggle it if you rapidly open and close it, which I can’t really recommend except to cement in your mind that this is the new normal.
It seems wholly different.
I own M1 MBP16. While closed laptop technically works... One nasty bug makes it unusable. I can't reliably switch keyboard layouts using globe button. This bug is absolutely weird and ridiculous and I have no idea how it's even possible. When laptop is opened, I press globe button and my keyboard layout is switched. Actually it does not work 100% reliably, but it's OK. With laptop closed it works like 20% of time.
Have no idea about ventura, will not update before first patch, I guess.
Have no idea about ventura, will not update before first patch, I guess.
I wonder if it's also possible to just leave the Macbook "opened", but disable only the Macbooks display and not the external display (so you'd get the same result as clamshell)...?
Lunar's Blackout feature can do that: https://lunar.fyi/#blackout
There's no built-in way to do it.
There's no built-in way to do it.
Wow! This alone is enough to convince me to upgrade.
I’m usually excited about macOS releases but this one is an underwhelming update and don’t see any reason to update any time soon.
Stage manager seems like a half measure to introduce better window management in macOS and it doesn’t help that it doesn’t support a keyboard only workflow, from what I can tell from the demos.
Coming from i3wm, I found Yabai to be an excellent keyboard-first window manager. I do wish something like Yabai was built into macOS.
Stage manager seems like a half measure to introduce better window management in macOS and it doesn’t help that it doesn’t support a keyboard only workflow, from what I can tell from the demos.
Coming from i3wm, I found Yabai to be an excellent keyboard-first window manager. I do wish something like Yabai was built into macOS.
I've been testing Stage Manager since the first developer beta of Ventura and it did feel awkward, as it had no keyboard control, and I feel slower when pointing and clicking to switch apps.
But after adding support for it in my rcmd app (https://lowtechguys.com/rcmd), and tuning yabai's grid a bit, I found it quite useful for my workflow.
Here's a video on how I use Stage Manager with the keyboard shortcuts in rcmd, if you'd like to see if the same workflow would be useful for you: https://youtu.be/dlwjSf7aIy8
I'm also giving out some promo codes for rcmd to give people a chance to try this functionality and see if they like it:
But after adding support for it in my rcmd app (https://lowtechguys.com/rcmd), and tuning yabai's grid a bit, I found it quite useful for my workflow.
Here's a video on how I use Stage Manager with the keyboard shortcuts in rcmd, if you'd like to see if the same workflow would be useful for you: https://youtu.be/dlwjSf7aIy8
I'm also giving out some promo codes for rcmd to give people a chance to try this functionality and see if they like it:
*previous codes redeemed*
RHKWKLML7YHA
9HL7XALHANL6
XP7N6N7PFJRP
AWA37JJLA9LJ
3FR6JR4LPPAF
93TFMMX6KM6M
7K4YLM6H3P6E
36MWRHWF7TM7
RTM9HEEAHTA7
AEMNXEX6WFPKTo save everyone else: All the codes seem to have been redeemed.
I didn't know I needed this but it is surprisingly pleasant to switch apps this way, thanks.
ps: I used the YP33H9AP9NFH code, so try the other ones.
ps: I used the YP33H9AP9NFH code, so try the other ones.
Not to diminish the work put into making this workflow easier to use, but you can completely replicate this workflow (and then some) with out of the box macOS tooling by creating an "Open <xyz.app>" script in Shortcuts, moving them into the Quick Actions folder and then jumping to System Preferences > Keyboard > Shortcuts > Services and then assigning key combinations to launch Shortcuts.app Quick Actions.
For sure you can. I had this workflow with manually added keybindings through many methods over the years: skhd, Hammerspoon, BetterTouchTool etc.
I just found that the functionality is useful enough to warrant an app that can dynamically assign these hotkeys based on the apps I use.
For example I change browsers often to test new additions. And because I have rcmd-B set to focus/launch/hide my current browser app, I can keep my muscle memory even after switching from Safari to Firefox. In rcmd I just press rcmd-ralt-B to reassign that hotkey, in previous workflows this involved editing a specific file, or opening a preferences window and finding the right setting to change.
The experimental window switching/opening using Right Option is also something very useful and really hard to replicate using default macOS tools.
I just found that the functionality is useful enough to warrant an app that can dynamically assign these hotkeys based on the apps I use.
For example I change browsers often to test new additions. And because I have rcmd-B set to focus/launch/hide my current browser app, I can keep my muscle memory even after switching from Safari to Firefox. In rcmd I just press rcmd-ralt-B to reassign that hotkey, in previous workflows this involved editing a specific file, or opening a preferences window and finding the right setting to change.
The experimental window switching/opening using Right Option is also something very useful and really hard to replicate using default macOS tools.
So nobody else has to waste time trying all of these codes - they're all burned up. Sorry folks :)
Added some more
All codes (new ones too) have been redeemed, interesting app! I personally like Contexts (https://contexts.co/) but it has been barely supported.
How do you redeem a promo code? The app store just asks me to buy, and the trial doesn't have any obvious place to enter a promo code.
Mac App Store app, click your user name in the lower left corner. Now the upper right corner has a link button "Redeem Gift Card". Click that, enter the code.
Grabbed one of the codes — thank you! Excited to try out rcmd
Managed to snag 36MWRHWF7TM7. Thanks for the giveaway!
If they put a bunch of new features in the OS, everyone complains, "Why don't they focus on stability!!"
If they focus on stability, everyone says, "Not enough new features to be worth the upgrade".
I guess no one can be happy. Or they expect a ton of new instantly stable features...
If they focus on stability, everyone says, "Not enough new features to be worth the upgrade".
I guess no one can be happy. Or they expect a ton of new instantly stable features...
For a lot of us, complaining is fun. It has a long tradition in human culture. A good kvetch lets off steam, especially when its a group kvetch.
Why can’t we have no features AND unstability? If the rumor spreads that Apple doesn’t succeed to fine enough OS-level programmers, it’s precisely because all of usability + stability + innovation are going down at the same time. Gone are the days where you’d expect Apple to launch a new APFS, encryption, or a general SSO solution for employees across all Apple devices.
Which is sorely needed.
Because honestly I’m afraid of paying $12 to $24 per device per employee and per month for an SSO+MDM solution that would make me depend on a dodgy Windows-style UI (Jamf) or worse, all my employees’ ability to login would depend on Okta.
Which is sorely needed.
Because honestly I’m afraid of paying $12 to $24 per device per employee and per month for an SSO+MDM solution that would make me depend on a dodgy Windows-style UI (Jamf) or worse, all my employees’ ability to login would depend on Okta.
> it’s precisely because all of usability + stability + innovation are going down at the same time
What are you basing that claim on? The only part recognizable from experience for me is the innovation claim and even that is dubious since the entire industry is plateauing as things mature.
What are you basing that claim on? The only part recognizable from experience for me is the innovation claim and even that is dubious since the entire industry is plateauing as things mature.
Or perhaps only half of 'everyone' feels compelled to comment each release.
Historically, the uninspiring and underwhelming major releases of OS X and macOS have ended up being the ones that users ended up having the most positive feelings about over the long term. They have tended to focus on faster performance, refining past features, and security improvements without the simultaneous introduction of fresh annoyances.
However, since you aren't really missing anything in terms of new features, it also doesn't hurt to wait for a couple point releases to let other people find remaining bugs first.
However, since you aren't really missing anything in terms of new features, it also doesn't hurt to wait for a couple point releases to let other people find remaining bugs first.
Based on the reviews and the public betas this isn't the "Snow Leopard" release that everyone is always waiting for.
One big feature for me is much improved Virtualization framework. I'm eager for https://github.com/docker/roadmap/issues/384 to be closed. Must solve some QoL issues for me.
same. this is huge for me.
I'm updating for these features: better iMessage (editing / unsending / mark as unread), Shared iCloud Photo Library, duplicate detection in Photos, Continuity Camera, Weather app, multi-stop Maps routing
Continuity Camera
I’ve been on the betas all summer; Continuity Camera is probably the most Apple-like feature in Ventura. It seems almost magical in how it “just works”.
I’ve been on the betas all summer; Continuity Camera is probably the most Apple-like feature in Ventura. It seems almost magical in how it “just works”.
I don't understand why it is not avaliable for iPad. Usually, I am using my macbook lid closed and I have an iPad in my desk. It would be very good to use its camera and mics for video calls.
Lot of pixels languishing under that lid there...
I hate to look at dramatically different sized screens simultaneously. So sorry cute little pixels.
> duplicate detection in Photos
What? Finally!
What? Finally!
With Ventura there's Rosetta support in Linux VMs. This is something I'm a bit excited about.
Actually, can't recall any recent release of Mac OS that excited me. It's mostly updates to apps I don't use or don't plan to use plus minor tweaks and window dressing. I usually just wait a few months until they fix all the "oops we bricked your hardware bugs" or "oops, this stuff is now broken" bugs.
Safari, Mail, Messages, Photos, I don't use any of it. So couldn't care less about that. This is not an OS update but a list of app updates. Other than that it's mostly window dressing. Some tweaks to settings and a new stage manager thing to replace the launcher thing that I also don't use.
What intrigues me is the ios webcam support and the fact that they use mac book pros without a notch in the mockups of that. Yay to no notch. But does that mean they are removing the web cam in future macs? Kind of relevant because I have an Android phone and no interest in switching to IOS. And I do use the webcam. If not, what's the point of this? Maybe they should just put better cameras in their screens and laptops? Also, what holds up the phone here? This looks very gimmicky to me. Anyway, absolutely nobody I know uses Facetime (I live in Europe, just not a thing here; same with iMessage) and I bet it doesn't work outside of that. I use macs at work, so things like Zoom, MS Live, Meets, Webex, etc. are where I use a webcam.
So, short, stage manager thingy, spotlight tweaks, some deckchair rearranging in the settings and metal 3.
Safari, Mail, Messages, Photos, I don't use any of it. So couldn't care less about that. This is not an OS update but a list of app updates. Other than that it's mostly window dressing. Some tweaks to settings and a new stage manager thing to replace the launcher thing that I also don't use.
What intrigues me is the ios webcam support and the fact that they use mac book pros without a notch in the mockups of that. Yay to no notch. But does that mean they are removing the web cam in future macs? Kind of relevant because I have an Android phone and no interest in switching to IOS. And I do use the webcam. If not, what's the point of this? Maybe they should just put better cameras in their screens and laptops? Also, what holds up the phone here? This looks very gimmicky to me. Anyway, absolutely nobody I know uses Facetime (I live in Europe, just not a thing here; same with iMessage) and I bet it doesn't work outside of that. I use macs at work, so things like Zoom, MS Live, Meets, Webex, etc. are where I use a webcam.
So, short, stage manager thingy, spotlight tweaks, some deckchair rearranging in the settings and metal 3.
Guys, which freaking keyboard-only window management yall looking for so hard? My daily workflow is jumping between 10 apps on different spaces, some of them are full-screen, some are just piled on one desktop, and the CMD+Tab just works perfectly all the time, you just press the CMD+Tab, select the app you need, jump to it, no focus lost, only distraction is the damned sliding animation (which
everyone wants to turn off for 10 years). What other damn bicycle you need to jump between apps lol
I agree with you but take it further, what's the point of different spaces? Just put all apps to full screen size (not "fullscreen") on the first screen and alt tab instantly
I like some of my apps full-screen, like nvim in the iterm should be full-screen. The top bar, tab bar and controls is not something i wanna see all the time there, as i'm using only keyboard in my workflow. I'm mostly into zen black screen with 100 columns of text in the center when it comes to editing documents, and nvim + iterm can provide such flawless black zen screen. Also games, books, graphic apps, all look better taking 100% of the height not 80%, as the 20% on top is usually mouse controls for those who don't remember any hotkeys
FYI You can turn off the animation and make most of the screen transitions less jarring using the Accessibility settings.
(Reduced motion iirc, I don’t have my Mac with me now)
(Reduced motion iirc, I don’t have my Mac with me now)
It helps if your problem is only the visuals, but sadly reduce motion keeps all the delays the same. There's a 1.5 second delay when switching spaces with the touchpad gesture (on 120Hz screens; the animation takes longer the higher FPS it's running at), and that animation turns into a 1.5 second fade animation with reduce motion. The new space doesn't gain focus any faster.
Ouch, I remember that you could change the animation duration / animation scale using a terminal command.
I don't remember the details, but it was similar to the approach from this (very dated! please search yourself) article: https://osxdaily.com/2012/02/14/speed-up-misson-control-anim...
I don't remember the details, but it was similar to the approach from this (very dated! please search yourself) article: https://osxdaily.com/2012/02/14/speed-up-misson-control-anim...
Yeah, it used to be possible, but hasn't been for a long time. There are some old stackoverflow posts with `defaults write` commands in them, but they don't work anymore.
I used to be a fairly heavy spaces user with 60Hz macbooks; the delay was too high, but just low enough to not drive me completely insane. But after I got one of the new 120Hz ones, I've almost entirely stopped using spaces, since I just can't stand the extremely long wait where my keyboard inputs still go to the application I'm coming from.
I used to be a fairly heavy spaces user with 60Hz macbooks; the delay was too high, but just low enough to not drive me completely insane. But after I got one of the new 120Hz ones, I've almost entirely stopped using spaces, since I just can't stand the extremely long wait where my keyboard inputs still go to the application I'm coming from.
Wouldn't it be awesome if Apple added window-snapping, and i3wm-like keyboard support? They'd leapfrog every other OS in an area where they've been behind for a while, and gain tons of praise from power users. There's so much low-hanging power-user-fruits that Apple's bizzarely not picking, like uBlock Origin support in Safari, better window management, and a Homebrew-like package manager.
Check out Rectangle for window snapping. I found it good enough and not overly complicated.
Yeah, that's what I use. There's just no good reason not to Sherlock it; if not for the fact that every single Mac power user would expect Apple to bundle a crippled, simplified version, to "dumb it down for the masses". Sigh.
Honestly, the somewhat limited experience works for me as every time I touch linux I get distracted by (endlessly) tweaking it. That's more of a problem with me I suppose!
I've played around with stage manager and it has left me scratching my head. It seems to have so much weird whitespace.
For keyboard control, I've gotten into using "Hide <app>" or "Hide others" cmd(-option)-h
This keeps the workspace nice and clean
For switching apps, either cmd-tab or cmd-` or with Alfred App
Indeed, for moving windows to left/right/etc, you may need an app like Rectangle
You _could_ add custom shortcuts in Settings - Keyboard for menu items like Zoom or "Move Window to Left Side of Screen" but it's a bit limited.
What is missing? I guess some people like live preview in cmd-tab, but I've been ok without it.
This keeps the workspace nice and clean
For switching apps, either cmd-tab or cmd-` or with Alfred App
Indeed, for moving windows to left/right/etc, you may need an app like Rectangle
You _could_ add custom shortcuts in Settings - Keyboard for menu items like Zoom or "Move Window to Left Side of Screen" but it's a bit limited.
What is missing? I guess some people like live preview in cmd-tab, but I've been ok without it.
I replaced Cmd-tab shortcut to launch https://alt-tab-macos.netlify.app/, who fix every issue with macos feature. Couldn't be happier.
> Coming from i3wm, I found Yabai to be an excellent keyboard-first window manager. I do wish something like Yabai was built into macOS.
For those on Windows, there is an equivalent app called bug.n that mimics dwm.
For those on Windows, there is an equivalent app called bug.n that mimics dwm.
The feature that made me jump into beta is that Shortcuts now appear in the share sheet so it’s the same experience like iOS. Much easier to create/test shortcuts on the mac
Window management gurus, is there alternatives to mission control? I’d love something that doesn’t waste space and is faster than default.
Cmd-Tab -> switch apps, in most recently used order, keep Cmd held down and repeatedly tap Tab to cycle though the switcher bar
Cmd-` -> switch windows of current app
Cmd-H -> hide current app
Cmd-Opt-H -> hide other apps
If you want more options, try Alt-Tab app: https://alt-tab-macos.netlify.app/
For IT/Security folks looking for a good rundown of what's new we put this together, talks about Passkeys, RSR, Gatekeeper improvements, and Lockdown mode.
https://www.kolide.com/blog/the-security-and-it-admin-s-guid...
https://www.kolide.com/blog/the-security-and-it-admin-s-guid...
Passkeys is a bit of an odd one.
They’ve been listing it as a Ventura upgrade, and all the marketing (more or less) points to this as a Ventura-and-later feature, but it’s on Big Sur and Monterey too.
They’ve been listing it as a Ventura upgrade, and all the marketing (more or less) points to this as a Ventura-and-later feature, but it’s on Big Sur and Monterey too.
It's really a Safari 16.1 feature, and 16.1 was released with Ventura, so I guess they're capitalizing on that publicity to drive the feature.
I ended up skipping Monterey on my 2013 Mac Pro entirely because it wouldn't let me install it because my original SSD broke and I replaced it with a non-Apple SSD. Starting with Monterey, that's not cool anymore because reasons.
Supposedly if you install the original SSD it will update some firmware somewhere and you'll be able to use the 3rd party SSD after that. But, like I said, mine's broken. You can supposedly also buy a used genuine SSD off eBay, but that seems a slightly expensive way to do a free OS upgrade.
Interesting story, Apple will not sell you a replacement or upgrade SSD for your 2013 Mac Pro - not for any price. They're only available for warranty replacements, and these computers haven't been under warranty for a long time.
Another thing I assume is still not fixed: The ability to permanently disable VRR for monitors that don't behave well with Apple's VRR implementation. That one's been annoying me with Monterey on my work laptop. Every time the computer sleeps, it turns VRR back on, and my screen blinks and flickers away until I manually turn it off again.
Supposedly if you install the original SSD it will update some firmware somewhere and you'll be able to use the 3rd party SSD after that. But, like I said, mine's broken. You can supposedly also buy a used genuine SSD off eBay, but that seems a slightly expensive way to do a free OS upgrade.
Interesting story, Apple will not sell you a replacement or upgrade SSD for your 2013 Mac Pro - not for any price. They're only available for warranty replacements, and these computers haven't been under warranty for a long time.
Another thing I assume is still not fixed: The ability to permanently disable VRR for monitors that don't behave well with Apple's VRR implementation. That one's been annoying me with Monterey on my work laptop. Every time the computer sleeps, it turns VRR back on, and my screen blinks and flickers away until I manually turn it off again.
Fyi, perhaps this is useful to you: https://dortania.github.io/OpenCore-Legacy-Patcher/
Apple's playbook is to use hardware support as a reason to drop software support to encourage (nudge?) customers to buy more hardware. Recently it has been dropping new macOS versions for non-metal GPUs and now (Monterey) not supporting SSDs without T2/Secure Enclave, and there are other examples before those. You get bit by this and decide if you want to stay on that train or get off. I was one-and-done with that ecosystem and my Late 2013 MacBook Pro.
Also you can still update that Mac Pro of yours to Monterey if you use the Open Core bootloader. It just requires going off the beaten path.
Also you can still update that Mac Pro of yours to Monterey if you use the Open Core bootloader. It just requires going off the beaten path.
> Apple's playbook is to use hardware support as a reason to drop software support to encourage (nudge?) customers to buy more hardware.
I mean, Apple was making new versions of macOS that supported the 2013 Mac Pro until literally today. If that's their playbook, they're not doing great.
I mean, Apple was making new versions of macOS that supported the 2013 Mac Pro until literally today. If that's their playbook, they're not doing great.
I think it's pretty wild my trashcan has had OS updates for almost 10 years. And researching these tools y'all are recommending it looks like it might actually still be possible to run Ventura on it.
This is actually probably my most favorite desktop computer I've ever owned. It's beautiful, and thanks to Intel's mediocre progress over the last decade, it's actually still pretty fast in all but the graphics department. Even still, it can play some modern games on low to medium settings just fine!
This is actually probably my most favorite desktop computer I've ever owned. It's beautiful, and thanks to Intel's mediocre progress over the last decade, it's actually still pretty fast in all but the graphics department. Even still, it can play some modern games on low to medium settings just fine!
I just bought a new 14" M1 MacBook Pro because they stopped doing OS updates for my 2014 Intel MacBook Pro. Kinda sad, as the 2014 MacBook Pro is still, STILL - in 2022!, one of the best laptops I've had (including for running Windows via Bootcamp). Being it had no trade-in value, I'll keep using it as a test machine for Intel builds of my app.
But yeah, the new Apple Silicon laptops are incredible, and I'm happy with the new purchase. If I get 8 years out of this one too, I'll be more than happy. To me, that's a reasonable length of time to support OSes on old hardware.
But yeah, the new Apple Silicon laptops are incredible, and I'm happy with the new purchase. If I get 8 years out of this one too, I'll be more than happy. To me, that's a reasonable length of time to support OSes on old hardware.
That’s just the 2013 Mac Pro. I cited two other examples that apply to several other models and years.
> Interesting story, Apple will not sell you a replacement or upgrade SSD for your 2013 Mac Pro - not for any price. They're only available for warranty replacements, and these computers haven't been under warranty for a long time.
This is bullshit. Think about all the PR they have about eco-friendliness, yet they do this
This is bullshit. Think about all the PR they have about eco-friendliness, yet they do this
That problem has been solved, Ventura doesn't run on the 2013 Mac Pro :P
macOS Ventura takes the Mac experience to a whole new level with groundbreaking capabilities that help users achieve more than ever.
Now there's a nothing burger sentence to start us off.
Now there's a nothing burger sentence to start us off.
Well to be fair the macOS PM's probably didn't give the marketing team anything to work with. Likely told them to just file radars/feedback if they had any questions.
Honestly I have higher standards for Apple telling me why I should upgrade and not just a rehash of ZOMBO.
This is like a placeholder sentence which should have been replaced with actual content.
And the legions of System Settings, Control Center, and Share Panel accessibility problems remain intact. I don't even understand the point of filing bugs during these betas anymore; macOS seems destined to be an unusable quagmire.
This stuff was noticed months ago: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31669950
This stuff was noticed months ago: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31669950
They have fixed date to release. They can't postpone release because of bugs they don't consider critical. Any mature and big project has thousands of known bugs which will never be fixed as it makes no financial sense. Sad but true.
Some bugs probably will be fixed in the upcoming patches. Some will not.
Some bugs probably will be fixed in the upcoming patches. Some will not.
"We've been putting the same 720p webcam in our laptops for 10 years so just go ahead and use your phone instead"
"We could increase the BOM cost putting a bigger camera in but the thickness of the laptop lid is so thin it would never be as good as the phone you most likely already own, so we made it easer for you to use that".
It's all a matter of perspective. :) I love the ability to use my phone as a webcam.
It's all a matter of perspective. :) I love the ability to use my phone as a webcam.
Perspective really is everything.
I think that most would be surprised to see a company selling a laptop for $1700 (CAD) in 2022 with a 720 webcam
https://www.apple.com/ca/macbook-pro/
Doing this, then advising you can use your phone's camera seems like an ugly hack.
It is also really awkward to be on a conf call using your phone as a webcam, then needing your phone because something important has come up.
I think that most would be surprised to see a company selling a laptop for $1700 (CAD) in 2022 with a 720 webcam
https://www.apple.com/ca/macbook-pro/
Doing this, then advising you can use your phone's camera seems like an ugly hack.
It is also really awkward to be on a conf call using your phone as a webcam, then needing your phone because something important has come up.
Try https://getlumina.com/ for a phone quality looking webcam with nice background blur and center-stage type auto-framing. Or, Logitech Brio w/ Xsplit Vcam https://www.xsplit.com/vcam (but Lumina does a better job auto-starting with videoconf tools).
Alternatively, get Reincubate's Camo to do Continuity with both iPhones and Android phones, and tons more features:
https://reincubate.com/camo/
Alternatively, get Reincubate's Camo to do Continuity with both iPhones and Android phones, and tons more features:
https://reincubate.com/camo/
And yet they insist on putting a notch on all new MacBooks. Seems like adding a webcam-free option and expanding Continuity Camera support to Android would be a pretty easy win.
> expanding Continuity Camera support to Android
Hahaha. Don't hold your breath. It's not going to happen for a couple of reasons. The large variety of Android devices would make reliability and support quite challening, mostly at Apple's expense. Which brings us to the second point: Tim Cook says "buy your mom an iPhone".
(ref: https://www.theverge.com/2022/9/7/23342243/tim-cook-apple-rc...)
Hahaha. Don't hold your breath. It's not going to happen for a couple of reasons. The large variety of Android devices would make reliability and support quite challening, mostly at Apple's expense. Which brings us to the second point: Tim Cook says "buy your mom an iPhone".
(ref: https://www.theverge.com/2022/9/7/23342243/tim-cook-apple-rc...)
That doesn't explain why the $3K 27" iMac on my desk has a 720p camera. Big expensive Mac, with a camera off an off-brand Windows laptop.
Or the awful quality of the Studio Display webcam!
It's nice to have the option of buying and using a single brand of smartphone to use as your laptop's webcam; but I'd prefer to use the laptop's webcam as the laptop's webcam, or use my phone as a webcam. It's all a matter of perspective. :)
Well it only works with Apple phones so
I suspect the Venn diagram of people who use a MacBook and people who use Android has a very small overlap in the circles.
Almost every Mac user I know is in that category. Generally they use a company-issued Mac for work and have a personal Android phone.
That sounds like a US thing to me. I know many people who use Macs because they're good value for money, but also use $300 Androids because they're good enough and they're JUST PHONES after all. The cheapest plain iPhone 14 costs $1070 here (or $80 cheaper from my carrier, but that's with an expensive contract, so fuck that).
I got my first iPhone after over 8 years of daily-driving a MacBook, and it's the most expensive phone I've ever had.
I got my first iPhone after over 8 years of daily-driving a MacBook, and it's the most expensive phone I've ever had.
> I suspect the Venn diagram of people who use a MacBook and people who use Android has a very small overlap in the circles.
Why? I'm in the overlap, and I don't think I'm that unusual.
Why? I'm in the overlap, and I don't think I'm that unusual.
This is actually the feature I upgraded for this morning. I always use a USB webcam on a stand in front of my 43" display. The laptop positioned usefully would block a huge part of my view. Now one less cable cluttering my desk and much higher quality (it's night and day honestly vs the Logitech I was using).
I want to see if they'll roll it out to AppleTV. Not being able to use an AppleTV for FaceTime, Zoom, etc just seems silly.
Now that we are all on video calls all day, the lower rez the laptop camera the better. Nobody uses their laptop camera for anything else.
"Stay tuned for our $100 phone holder for Macs. It has never been done before."
$24 on Amazon:
https://smile.amazon.com/Continuity-Ventura-MagSafe-Laptops-...
Or $19:
https://smile.amazon.com/Continuity-MacBook-Compatible-Magsa...
They work quite well with the Magsafe iPhones.
https://smile.amazon.com/Continuity-Ventura-MagSafe-Laptops-...
Or $19:
https://smile.amazon.com/Continuity-MacBook-Compatible-Magsa...
They work quite well with the Magsafe iPhones.
But Apple's version has extra features, like being pricier. It's also made out of cheap plastic in the name of environment.
Can you link to Apple’s version?
I can use my iphone as a webcam now? This is great, I can just get rid of my actual webcam which is hot garbage anyway.
MacBook Air/Pro use 1080p webcams
I'm surprised they released this. I try to participate in every macOS beta I can. This is by far the most unstable release I've experienced.
- Settings app has a lot of weird bugs and performance issues. After a restart I have to wait a few minutes before the Settings app actually functions. Overall the Settings app has felt like a step back in terms of UX and performance
- Lots of weird issues with Docker (might be on Docker's side though)
- My screen goes black after disconnecting my external monitor and requires a restart to fix the issue
- Strange networking issues
- Settings app has a lot of weird bugs and performance issues. After a restart I have to wait a few minutes before the Settings app actually functions. Overall the Settings app has felt like a step back in terms of UX and performance
- Lots of weird issues with Docker (might be on Docker's side though)
- My screen goes black after disconnecting my external monitor and requires a restart to fix the issue
- Strange networking issues
Performance of the Settings app is disappointing. Most of its views are just a handful of basic controls with a fixed layout, and yet switching to not-yet-cached views has a noticeable lag.
I'm flabbergasted that Apple's latest UI struggles to beat web apps not just on design (RIP Aqua), but also performance.
I'm flabbergasted that Apple's latest UI struggles to beat web apps not just on design (RIP Aqua), but also performance.
I just upgraded my Mac and holy cow, is the new System Settings app buggy... and it's also fixed-width for whatever reason.
Also, it seems to think - for a few moments after every restart - that my Wifi connection is to a hidden network, when it actually isn't. Welp.
Also, it seems to think - for a few moments after every restart - that my Wifi connection is to a hidden network, when it actually isn't. Welp.
System Preferences was always fixed-width; it's Windows's Settings app that's not.
Yes, but I was expecting the new one to have a responsive design. Wasn't it rewritten from scratch using iOS-like tech or something?
Don't know how if it was rewritten; but it's no longer fixed-height, which is IMO what matters when dealing with long lists.
I've been running in the beta since the spring too and I haven't seen any of these problems
> Lots of weird issues with Docker (might be on Docker's side though)
Thanks for the heads up on this
Thanks for the heads up on this
Installed fine on my 2018 15" MacBook Pro. Still a good machine that I use as my main machine. Took about 20 minutes I guess, didn't time it but was ready quicker than I expected.
None of the changes are life changing but oh well, isn't often a desktop OS really surprises me with something new these days. Hopefully it is as stable as Monterey was for me which didn't have a single crash in the whole year.
Stage Manager is interesting but a very minimal effort by Apple. They really need to work on better overall window management in macOS. Snapping and tighter keyboard management for moving and resizing windows is badly needed. Either that or they need to relax their accessibility restrictions for apps so that we can get some good third-party options without needing to disable SIP.
Overall it seems to be mostly quality of life improvements, a few related to their primary services (such as Photo Library sharing) which will obviously be handy for up-selling iCloud/Apple One paid upgrades.
I am interested to see the new virtualisation framework stuff. Wondering if things like Distrobox (podman) can make use of it.
None of the changes are life changing but oh well, isn't often a desktop OS really surprises me with something new these days. Hopefully it is as stable as Monterey was for me which didn't have a single crash in the whole year.
Stage Manager is interesting but a very minimal effort by Apple. They really need to work on better overall window management in macOS. Snapping and tighter keyboard management for moving and resizing windows is badly needed. Either that or they need to relax their accessibility restrictions for apps so that we can get some good third-party options without needing to disable SIP.
Overall it seems to be mostly quality of life improvements, a few related to their primary services (such as Photo Library sharing) which will obviously be handy for up-selling iCloud/Apple One paid upgrades.
I am interested to see the new virtualisation framework stuff. Wondering if things like Distrobox (podman) can make use of it.
I’ve been using Rectangle for window management. Works well for my workflow since I’ll usually just pin two apps side by side, and jump them around different screens.
It would be nice to have this feature natively though.
https://rectangleapp.com/
It would be nice to have this feature natively though.
https://rectangleapp.com/
Yeah I have been using Magnet since longer than I can remember. It is limited though. It's fine for basic snapping side by side or in quads but can't do multi-resizing (i.e. resizing two windows snapped side by side that are not fullscreen), doesn't have layouts, can't place a window when it is opened (e.g. auto snap terminal to bottom left if first Terminal window opened), etc.
I would love to see a full manual or dynamic tiling window manager for macOS that didn't require disabling SIP like yabai does and wasn't super janky.
I would love to see a full manual or dynamic tiling window manager for macOS that didn't require disabling SIP like yabai does and wasn't super janky.
You can use most of yabai without disabling SIP, and as a regular user the most jank in yabai IMO is some reflow that happens whenever your display config changes, which I think is largely forgivable.
What's the best place to read technical details about new Mac releases? This has a bit, as do other sites like https://www.macrumors.com/roundup/macos-13/, but I wonder if there's something with a more exhaustive list -- something that reads like actual "patch notes".
The Ars Technica reviews are always pretty thorough: https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2022/10/macos-13-ventura-the...
They stopped being thorough after John Siracusa stopped writing them.
Seriously, back in the days John Siracusa would dive into internal details. For example in 10.7 Lion (in 2011) Apple introduced full disk encryption. John didn't just stop at the usual description of the functionality, screenshots and performance metrics. He described Apple's then-new logical volume manager implementation to get this feature to work. He then speculated on Apple's future plans for the technology (pooled storage aka a single logical volume group spanning multiple physical drives) which became the reality in 2012 with Fusion Drive. This is the kind of review I wanted to read.
Seriously, back in the days John Siracusa would dive into internal details. For example in 10.7 Lion (in 2011) Apple introduced full disk encryption. John didn't just stop at the usual description of the functionality, screenshots and performance metrics. He described Apple's then-new logical volume manager implementation to get this feature to work. He then speculated on Apple's future plans for the technology (pooled storage aka a single logical volume group spanning multiple physical drives) which became the reality in 2012 with Fusion Drive. This is the kind of review I wanted to read.
John is in the pantheon for my favorite people that I do not know. I hope he never tires of sharing things with us via podcast or writing.
What is with that extended scrolling thing though. I want to look at the scrollbar to know how long a document (including a web page) is, not have it keep changing as I move farther into it.
'Oh people don't like looking at long documents' - then they're not your target customers and you should just ignore them and stop listening to the ad sales person who is paid by commission.
'Oh people don't like looking at long documents' - then they're not your target customers and you should just ignore them and stop listening to the ad sales person who is paid by commission.
Probably lazy loading the images/content blocks when you get near to save bandwidth but not having same-sized placeholders. I see that a lot.
That's a better guess than mine. I'm surprised that a high quality site like AT would accept such a low quality user experience.
Ads. It's always ads.
some things never change :)
The Ars Technica review is thorough, and acts as a good set of "release notes", but it's published upon release, and obviously doesn't cover the stuff that devs and users discover throughout the following year.
I recommend the excellent EclecticLight blog (by H. Oakley). He doesn't try to do a comprehensive overview (you have Ars for that), but has done many technical deep-dives covering changes that haven't been talked about anywhere else, and I can't praise him enough for that.
Michael Tsai also has a great blog (mjtsai.com/blog/) that functions as a news agregator for Apple stories and commentary, and though his blog's not dedicated to only macOS, you'll find regular stories on technical details there.
I recommend the excellent EclecticLight blog (by H. Oakley). He doesn't try to do a comprehensive overview (you have Ars for that), but has done many technical deep-dives covering changes that haven't been talked about anywhere else, and I can't praise him enough for that.
Michael Tsai also has a great blog (mjtsai.com/blog/) that functions as a news agregator for Apple stories and commentary, and though his blog's not dedicated to only macOS, you'll find regular stories on technical details there.
Six Colors is also good: https://sixcolors.com/post/2022/10/macos-ventura-review-a-wo...
(I miss John Siracusa's reviews for ArsTechnica)
(I miss John Siracusa's reviews for ArsTechnica)
The answer is undoubtedly https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2022/10/macos-13-ventura-the...
Apple used to feel to me like a company that sold user experiences and the hardware was a means to that end. Now it feels like an electronics company that sells consumer hardware, and the user experience is just a necessary cost to be minimized.
It's macOS alright. The addition of a weather app is great. Otherwise I feel like macOS has mostly regressed since the redesign with Big Sur.
I still miss the old design and performance has steadily declined with each version.
Stage manager feels like this years version of "What if instead implementing window snapping we make up a new clunky way to disimprove multitasking.
It looks like Ventura drops support for the 2nd generation (Late 2010 to 2017) MacBook Airs (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MacBook_Air). So let's figure one more year for Big Sur, then another year for (edit) Monterey, then I guess they will need to migrate to Linux.
Ventura even drops support for the 2016 (Touchbar) Macbook Pros which is frustrating. The machines are certainly powerful enough. But support for Intel Macs will probably be dropped sooner rather than later.
I’m specifically peeved about this. My personal 2016 mbp has nearly identical specs to my work 2017 mbp but my personal one is being left behind. Maybe there’s some minuscule hardware issue they couldn’t be bothered to work out but 5-6 years of OS updates is upsettingly short. I’d expect that for an android phone but not a high end laptop…
There does seem to be a dev working on porting over the OS if anyone has an earlier mac and really wants the new OS.
There does seem to be a dev working on porting over the OS if anyone has an earlier mac and really wants the new OS.
> My personal 2016 mbp has nearly identical specs to my work 2017 mbp but my personal one is being left behind.
Still on Catalina here, yikes
(Concerns about potential VirtualBox issues held me back though I suppose I can/should at least upgrade to Monterey now.)
(Concerns about potential VirtualBox issues held me back though I suppose I can/should at least upgrade to Monterey now.)
Could anyone please share emoji file, do not want to get 12gb only for this :D `/System/Library/Fonts/Apple Color Emoji.ttc`
nvm, https://0x0.st/oxdZ.ttc
Apple Color Emoji
Version 18.0d4e1
Glyph count 3 574
nvm, https://0x0.st/oxdZ.ttc
Apple Color Emoji
Version 18.0d4e1
Glyph count 3 574
What's the proper way to use/install these? Just copy it into `/Library/Fonts`?
You don't lose 12GB, since it's replacing existing data
Very excited about the ability to run x86 VMs through Rosetta. This will make x86 virtualization a lot more straightforward on Apple Silicon (no more reliance on qemu).
Can Ventura run x86 VMs on M1/M2?
I thought it was only able to run ARM VMs which can _utilize_ rosetta to run x86 code?
https://developer.apple.com/documentation/virtualization/run...
I thought it was only able to run ARM VMs which can _utilize_ rosetta to run x86 code?
https://developer.apple.com/documentation/virtualization/run...
You're correct, there is no support for directly running non-ARM VMs.
You ended up with bad information. You can not run x86 VMs through Rosetta. They do support Linux ARM VMs running x86 Linux binaries within the VM.
Ventura and iPadOS 16 dropped (along with iOS 16.1), but not Xcode 14.1 (which is still RC). I don't recall them ever not releasing Xcode at the same time as an OS update.
Well, I certainly hope the command-line tools are up to date. Otherwise upgrading brew and all its ecosystem might be somewhat of a pain.
Right now, homebrew is refusing to compile packages from source:
Error: Your Xcode (14.0.1) is too outdated.
Please update to Xcode 14.1 (or delete it).
Xcode can be updated from the App Store.I’ve been running Homebrew on Ventura beta all summer; if you don’t want to install the entire colossal Xcode 14.1, you probably just need the latest command line tools [1].
[1]: https://download.developer.apple.com/Developer_Tools/Command...
[1]: https://download.developer.apple.com/Developer_Tools/Command...
There is a new RC out
(RC 2)
https://download.developer.apple.com/Developer_Tools/Command...
You may also need to run sudo xcode-select -switch /Library/Developer/CommandLineTools
You may also need to run sudo xcode-select -switch /Library/Developer/CommandLineTools
There _is_ a switch for that someplace. Or check the environment variables in the docs, I had that issue once in the past.
And iOS 15.7 seems to be already abandoned.
iOS 15.7 got a bunch of security updates [1] last month; it’s still a supported operating system. There’s no reason to believe there won’t be future security updates if they’re necessary.
Apple released a security update for iOS 12 a couple of months ago [2], an operating system released a little over 4 years ago. I think you’re good.
[1]: https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT213445
[2]: https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT213428
Apple released a security update for iOS 12 a couple of months ago [2], an operating system released a little over 4 years ago. I think you’re good.
[1]: https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT213445
[2]: https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT213428
> iOS 15.7 got a bunch of security updates [1] last month
And nothing this month which means it's already vulnerable to pretty much all of the vulnerabilities that got fixed. Some could be iOS 16 specific but the vast majority are not.
> Apple released a security update for iOS 12 a couple of months ago
And fixed a single vulnerability because it was actively exploited in the wild, leaving the OS with hundreds of other vulnerabilities unfixed.
Not arguing Apple should keep OS versions supported forever but the reality is that unless you're on the latest major version you're pretty much out of luck.
And nothing this month which means it's already vulnerable to pretty much all of the vulnerabilities that got fixed. Some could be iOS 16 specific but the vast majority are not.
> Apple released a security update for iOS 12 a couple of months ago
And fixed a single vulnerability because it was actively exploited in the wild, leaving the OS with hundreds of other vulnerabilities unfixed.
Not arguing Apple should keep OS versions supported forever but the reality is that unless you're on the latest major version you're pretty much out of luck.
And nothing this month which means it's already vulnerable to pretty much all of the vulnerabilities that got fixed. Some could be iOS 16 specific but the vast majority are not.
The fact that there hasn’t been a second security update for iOS 15 doesn’t mean another one isn’t coming which it almost certainly is.
unless you're on the latest major version you're pretty much out of luck
As I just mentioned, iOS 12, a 4-year old operating system got updated a couple of month ago and iOS 15 will continue getting updates obviously.
To put things in perspective, updating iOS 12 means devices as old as the iPhone 5s were updated. The iPhone 5s first shipped September 2013—over 9 years ago!
I suspect Android devices released 9 years ago haven’t been updated in a long long time.
Besides, by the summer of 2023, something like 80+% of the installed base will be on iOS 16, which is what happens every year. iOS 16 is already a little ahead of where iOS 15 installs were at the same time last year [1].
[1]: https://appleinsider.com/articles/22/09/14/ios-16-adoption-s...
The fact that there hasn’t been a second security update for iOS 15 doesn’t mean another one isn’t coming which it almost certainly is.
unless you're on the latest major version you're pretty much out of luck
As I just mentioned, iOS 12, a 4-year old operating system got updated a couple of month ago and iOS 15 will continue getting updates obviously.
To put things in perspective, updating iOS 12 means devices as old as the iPhone 5s were updated. The iPhone 5s first shipped September 2013—over 9 years ago!
I suspect Android devices released 9 years ago haven’t been updated in a long long time.
Besides, by the summer of 2023, something like 80+% of the installed base will be on iOS 16, which is what happens every year. iOS 16 is already a little ahead of where iOS 15 installs were at the same time last year [1].
[1]: https://appleinsider.com/articles/22/09/14/ios-16-adoption-s...
The iOS 12 update mentioned is for webkit
https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT213428
Depending on your Android version the equivalent is either webview or Chrome.
The requirements for which are Android 5 and Android 4 respectively (according to a 3rd party website I found- the play store annoyingly doesn't list system requirements).
These were released 2014 and 2011.
Sometimes I think Google should be more in your face about app updates, especially ones that would be considered part of the operating system in other ecosystems.
https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT213428
Depending on your Android version the equivalent is either webview or Chrome.
The requirements for which are Android 5 and Android 4 respectively (according to a 3rd party website I found- the play store annoyingly doesn't list system requirements).
These were released 2014 and 2011.
Sometimes I think Google should be more in your face about app updates, especially ones that would be considered part of the operating system in other ecosystems.
The iOS 12 update was a one-off fix to an actively exploited vulnerability in Safari. Plenty of other bugs are still unpatched.
Plenty of old Android devices get some security updates too. For example, Chrome on Android is updated to the latest version on all phones running Android 6, which was released in 2015. Android long-term support isn't great, but that doesn't mean that old versions receive no security patches at all.
Plenty of old Android devices get some security updates too. For example, Chrome on Android is updated to the latest version on all phones running Android 6, which was released in 2015. Android long-term support isn't great, but that doesn't mean that old versions receive no security patches at all.
Quoting myself:
The fact that there hasn’t been a second security update for iOS 15 doesn’t mean another one isn’t coming which it almost certainly is.
And it certainly did. [1].
[1]: APPLE-SA-2022-10-27-1 iOS 15.7.1 and iPadOS 15.7.1
https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT213490
The fact that there hasn’t been a second security update for iOS 15 doesn’t mean another one isn’t coming which it almost certainly is.
And it certainly did. [1].
[1]: APPLE-SA-2022-10-27-1 iOS 15.7.1 and iPadOS 15.7.1
https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT213490
You were right.
[deleted]
I don't use Safari, Mail, Photos, iCloud or Spotlight (except to start apps - I deselect all the other options), and only activate the sidebar/widgets on accident (out of sight, out of mind). Nor do I own an iPad or play games on my Mac. I'm sure I'll never use Stage Manager and hope it's something I can turn off.
In short, this upgrade is simply an hour or so of annoyance, but Apple is Apple. You take the good with the bad. I have a dream - which will never happen - of a "MinMac" setting on install where you just get the least amount of cruft possible.
In short, this upgrade is simply an hour or so of annoyance, but Apple is Apple. You take the good with the bad. I have a dream - which will never happen - of a "MinMac" setting on install where you just get the least amount of cruft possible.
Snow Leopard was the peak
And Mavericks was the peak of GUI look-and-feel, before they went with the all-flat look.
The flat look is good, but the regression in UX is not
I really loved Aqua (especially without the pinstripe backgrounds)
The flat look and feel is exactly that.
The flat look and feel is exactly that.
This. Double tap dragging felt great. I don't understand why they killed it. BTT revived it. They killed it too :) Why? \(??)/
Was anyone able to resist upgrading from 12.6.1 to 13.0?
I've never been enthusiastic about Apple's annual upgrade schedule for macOS, biannual was far more comfortable. When responsible for users' desktops, I tend to wait for months after at least .1 is released and even then only start with one lucky user for weeks of trial period, and I do the same with application updates. Invariably, users ask for upgrades, and I make them tell me what new features or security enhancements they can't do without, and that usually calms them down.
At home, I'm still holding out on 10.14.6, but this old mini is only supported up to 10.15.7, so I figured I might as well freeze upgrading on Mojave so I can still run legacy 32-bit software if I want it. I may even downgrade to 10.13 so I can build Basilisk II and other 32-bit only software, but I suppose I can still use binaries, so not absolutely necessary. I just don't need new hardware yet, so I have the luxury of waiting until after Apple stops selling M1 minis. They're so reasonable to begin with, my hope is they can soon after be found for a song. I really want a 2018 Mini, also, but they'll take longer to come down in price, unfortunately and for no particularly great reason.
I've never been enthusiastic about Apple's annual upgrade schedule for macOS, biannual was far more comfortable. When responsible for users' desktops, I tend to wait for months after at least .1 is released and even then only start with one lucky user for weeks of trial period, and I do the same with application updates. Invariably, users ask for upgrades, and I make them tell me what new features or security enhancements they can't do without, and that usually calms them down.
At home, I'm still holding out on 10.14.6, but this old mini is only supported up to 10.15.7, so I figured I might as well freeze upgrading on Mojave so I can still run legacy 32-bit software if I want it. I may even downgrade to 10.13 so I can build Basilisk II and other 32-bit only software, but I suppose I can still use binaries, so not absolutely necessary. I just don't need new hardware yet, so I have the luxury of waiting until after Apple stops selling M1 minis. They're so reasonable to begin with, my hope is they can soon after be found for a song. I really want a 2018 Mini, also, but they'll take longer to come down in price, unfortunately and for no particularly great reason.
Updated my MacBook Pro, worked well (as expected), then proceeded to upgrade my M1 Mini headless "server". Update in itself went OK, though it doesn't respect that i have user accounts on an external SSD, so i had to ssh in as my "admin account", delete the /Volumes/Homes mount and reboot.
Now, my mini mirrors our cloud data locally for backups, and as such every user is signed in, and one way of doing that is simply a remote desktop and "switch user". It's cumbersome, and i wish it would just "magically" synchronize data once the user had registered on it, but it only needs to be done every time it restarts, which is when i new patch/version is released.
Anyway, i clicked "switch user" and poof lost connection. Following tries gave an "invalid desktop size 0x0" error, or it simply produced noise on the remote desktop window.
Logging in the user directly through remote desktop worked, but just be aware there may be dragons.
Now, my mini mirrors our cloud data locally for backups, and as such every user is signed in, and one way of doing that is simply a remote desktop and "switch user". It's cumbersome, and i wish it would just "magically" synchronize data once the user had registered on it, but it only needs to be done every time it restarts, which is when i new patch/version is released.
Anyway, i clicked "switch user" and poof lost connection. Following tries gave an "invalid desktop size 0x0" error, or it simply produced noise on the remote desktop window.
Logging in the user directly through remote desktop worked, but just be aware there may be dragons.
Very curious to know if Venture + VM + Linux + Steam is a setup that'll work with the new VM support.
I kind of want to play some old school windows games, but I don't want to pay for parallels.
I kind of want to play some old school windows games, but I don't want to pay for parallels.
Try UTM https://mac.getutm.app
Not OP but offering perspective: I've tried it and it's so painfully slow that I just coughed up the money for parallels.
Is Parallels that much faster?
In my experience using linux vms mainly for database workloads Parallels is nearly 10x faster than both UTM using Qemu and even Apple Virtualization (just tested it this morning using Ventura and the latest UTM 4.0 version with Ventura updates).
Interesting, I didn't know you could even get better performance than properly-configured QEMU. Are you sure you had GPU passthrough enabled?
I'm not sure but all of my vms are headless so I don't think that would really have any benefit..?
I wholeheartedly agree :)
Here's a good write-up on Stage Manager: https://eclecticlight.co/2022/09/12/why-venturas-stage-manag...
What I didn't know, is that you can hide "Recent Apps" (the app thumbnails on the left) in System Settings. It supplements Mission Control & Spaces, and makes it quite easy to switch between apps. You can also group multiple windows together to switch to them in one tap. Pretty neat.
What I didn't know, is that you can hide "Recent Apps" (the app thumbnails on the left) in System Settings. It supplements Mission Control & Spaces, and makes it quite easy to switch between apps. You can also group multiple windows together to switch to them in one tap. Pretty neat.
Be aware anyone using Parallels 17, it isn't compatible on Ventura so you will have to upgrade to the latest version for $70:
https://forum.parallels.com/threads/did-anyone-else-on-17-ge...
https://forum.parallels.com/threads/did-anyone-else-on-17-ge...
So for what its worth, I just upgraded to Ventura and was able to continue using Windows 11 on Parallels 17, so I'm not really sure what is going on with their confusing messaging.
Updated already. Seems stable and they fixed a few annoying bugs in reminders.
Focus on Mac could be so much better, but sadly like file tags, it remains half-baked.
I'd love to be able to set, say a "Programming" Focus, and have everything else disappear: All my desktop spaces would change, including their wallpapers (replaced by the Matrix green rain) and only the apps that I allowed would be visible, and even the files/folders and websites which I didn't include in that Focus should not be accessible (from the GUI or Terminal at least).
Basically it should be sort of like logging into a different user account, without logging into a different user account (i.e. keeping all your data and state, just temporarily filtering it).
In fact I think all operating systems should adopt the notion of a "focus" as a fundamental sub-level under the user account: Bob may have a social networking focus, office focus, or no focus, and so on.
I'd love to be able to set, say a "Programming" Focus, and have everything else disappear: All my desktop spaces would change, including their wallpapers (replaced by the Matrix green rain) and only the apps that I allowed would be visible, and even the files/folders and websites which I didn't include in that Focus should not be accessible (from the GUI or Terminal at least).
Basically it should be sort of like logging into a different user account, without logging into a different user account (i.e. keeping all your data and state, just temporarily filtering it).
In fact I think all operating systems should adopt the notion of a "focus" as a fundamental sub-level under the user account: Bob may have a social networking focus, office focus, or no focus, and so on.
Trying to achieve some of that with Shortcuts, AppleScript and some shell scripting could be a fun weekend project.
There's quite a lot of stuff in macOS (iOS and iPadOS too!) that's surprisingly scriptable.
There's quite a lot of stuff in macOS (iOS and iPadOS too!) that's surprisingly scriptable.
Yes, the out-of-the-box extensibility/scriptability of macOS is often overlooked by people coming from Windows thinking uglier==smarter && prettier==dumber.
> Gaming on Mac Reaches New Heights
I laughed in real life.
I laughed in real life.
I've actually had a decent experience on my M1. You're not going to be playing AAA games, but League of Legends, Civ, Minecraft, Factorio -- all play pretty well at medium-ish settings.
Is there anything there for people like us? Can't remember the last time I got excited about upgrading macOS.
[deleted]
Note: it's possible to install Ventura side-by-side with Monterey:
https://eclecticlight.co/2022/10/04/how-to-keep-monterey-whe...
https://eclecticlight.co/2022/10/04/how-to-keep-monterey-whe...
I cannot help but see a visual of Jim Carrey saying "Alrighty then" every time I read the name.
How about fixing the damn MIDI server which is crashing since Yosemite?
Seriously, another big update feels like a pack of minor changes which could fit in a small patch, marketed as "whole new level with groundbreaking capabilities"
So they keep providing updates mostly focusing on people that heavily rely on the Apple ecosystem (iPhone, Mail & Safari, ...), without seriously improving the fundamental features of the OS. Well: very disappointed, again.
All those improvements and the Mail experience is still lousy when you need to quickly move messages to folders. I have been relying on MsgFiler[1] for years, but it's been over two decades and Mail.app has not improved much (and mind you, I still prefer using Mail.app over anything else on a Mac). Thank goodness we still have plugins.
[1]: https://apps.apple.com/us/app/msgfiler/id418778021?mt=12
[1]: https://apps.apple.com/us/app/msgfiler/id418778021?mt=12
Stopped reading at
> With Continuity Camera, Mac users can leverage the powerful camera system on iPhone to unleash a groundbreaking webcam experience
I don't have the energy to parse a lot of text like this...
> With Continuity Camera, Mac users can leverage the powerful camera system on iPhone to unleash a groundbreaking webcam experience
I don't have the energy to parse a lot of text like this...
Hasn't 2000s+ Apple always talked that way in their marketing copy?
I hope they fixed Night Shift. It was always turning off when it was supposed to turn on. Whatever checkboxes checked. Like 6pm screen goes blueish, wtf.
I can't help but wonder how Steve Jobs would have flipped out if he saw something like this on his devices.
https://www.apple.com/newsroom/images/product/availability/A...
I'm so confused by that photo. Are you supposed to just duct-tape your phone to the laptop?
They are preparing us for when they put phone grade cams in the MacBook: “We compressed everything you love about the iPhone camera, and it’s entire ecosystem, into this tiny, adorable little bump on the lid” complete with a $5M, 30 second video intro. And then it will be the coolest wart ever.
It’d be cool if they used the iPhone built in magnets, and then display your phone stuff in the OS
Belkin’s iPhone Mount does use the magnets required by MagSafe [1].
[1]: https://www.apple.com/shop/product/HQ642ZM/A/belkin-iphone-m...
[1]: https://www.apple.com/shop/product/HQ642ZM/A/belkin-iphone-m...
But it’d be even better if the laptop lid was just magnetic!
Expand your digital world while your apartment shrinks to the size of a closet
wtf is this foto, like how is this iphone half the size of the mac? also, is it taped to the mac? I bet it would actually just drag the lid down with its weight. so it stands on something?
> like how is this iphone half the size of the mac?
That part looks correct to me?
I don't have an iPhone to compare, but my phone is easily half the size of a 14" MacBook Pro when placed like that... and Google tells me that some iPhones are basically the same size as my phone.
That part looks correct to me?
I don't have an iPhone to compare, but my phone is easily half the size of a 14" MacBook Pro when placed like that... and Google tells me that some iPhones are basically the same size as my phone.
_big.jpg.medium.jpg is a nice touch
[deleted]
Given that Steve Jobs actively colluded with Eric Schmidt to depress worker wages, maybe he was just a bad person and should be memory-holed. We can build a better world without him.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/time.com/42322/steve-jobs-chill...
https://www.google.com/amp/s/time.com/42322/steve-jobs-chill...
A real prick move but irrelevant to what I'm talking about. I'm talking about Steve's relentless pursuit of design perfection.
I never checked before but just assumed my MBP from 2016 would be supported. It’s not. Really sucks since the current latest version works really well and the machine was maxed out (i7, 16gb ram) and is more than capable of handling Ventura. Apple seems to be aggressively dropping support for x86 macs, quicker than historically they did.
Stage Manager is wonderful, because I can finally group an iOS simulator with the Safari inspector window that inspects it.
The Mac (historically being known for desktop publishing) should know that Ventura was someone else's brand.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corel_Ventura
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corel_Ventura
It's OK to double up trademarked brands as long as it's in a different market. But you have to pretend to be upset about it in court to avoid claims that you have abandoned your trademark, which is why Apple sues every company with a name like 'Apple fruit company'.
Some very nice additions, specially in the backend (like improvements to the virtualization framework and metal 3). But I still despise this new iOS-inspired UI. They should make iOS prettier and more usable not macOS uglier and less usable.
Every time I get a notification, Notification Center pegs to 100% CPU and locks up. Can't even get rid of the notification. Gotta kill the process.
Did this update add an "archive" feature to Messages? I can't directly tell from this summary ("powerful" isn't all that descriptive, turns out).
Lockdown mode looks very usable despite the messaging that it is "designed for the very few individuals." Users can even exclude applications from Lockdown mode.
When Lockdown Mode is enabled, some apps and features will function differently, including:
Messages - Most message attachment types are blocked, other than certain images, video, and audio. Some features, such as links and link previews, are unavailable.
Web browsing - Certain complex web technologies are blocked, which might cause some websites to load more slowly or not operate correctly. In addition, web fonts might not be displayed, and images might be replaced with a missing image icon.
FaceTime - Incoming FaceTime calls are blocked unless you have previously called that person or contact.
Apple Services - Incoming invitations for Apple Services, such as invitations to manage a home in the Home app, are blocked unless you have previously invited that person.
Shared albums - Shared albums are removed from the Photos app, and new Shared Album invitations are blocked. You can still view these shared albums on other devices that don’t have Lockdown Mode enabled.
USB accessories - To connect your device to a USB accessory or another computer, the device needs to be unlocked. Configuration profiles - Configuration profiles can’t be installed, and the device can’t be enrolled in Mobile Device Management or device supervision while in Lockdown Mode.
Phone calls and plain text messages continue to work while Lockdown Mode is enabled. Emergency features, such as SOS emergency calls, are not affected.
https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT212650
When Lockdown Mode is enabled, some apps and features will function differently, including:
Messages - Most message attachment types are blocked, other than certain images, video, and audio. Some features, such as links and link previews, are unavailable.
Web browsing - Certain complex web technologies are blocked, which might cause some websites to load more slowly or not operate correctly. In addition, web fonts might not be displayed, and images might be replaced with a missing image icon.
FaceTime - Incoming FaceTime calls are blocked unless you have previously called that person or contact.
Apple Services - Incoming invitations for Apple Services, such as invitations to manage a home in the Home app, are blocked unless you have previously invited that person.
Shared albums - Shared albums are removed from the Photos app, and new Shared Album invitations are blocked. You can still view these shared albums on other devices that don’t have Lockdown Mode enabled.
USB accessories - To connect your device to a USB accessory or another computer, the device needs to be unlocked. Configuration profiles - Configuration profiles can’t be installed, and the device can’t be enrolled in Mobile Device Management or device supervision while in Lockdown Mode.
Phone calls and plain text messages continue to work while Lockdown Mode is enabled. Emergency features, such as SOS emergency calls, are not affected.
https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT212650
Yep, much like on the phone, Lockdown is really attractive to me to just run all the time.
- I never want executable content sent to me via messages.
- I already block web fonts everywhere I can. I do want to know what other "complex web technologies" are blocked.
- I don't care about Facetime.
- I don't use Apple services or Icloud.
- Ignoring USB when locked should be a default.
- I never want executable content sent to me via messages.
- I already block web fonts everywhere I can. I do want to know what other "complex web technologies" are blocked.
- I don't care about Facetime.
- I don't use Apple services or Icloud.
- Ignoring USB when locked should be a default.
[deleted]
> Ignoring USB when locked should be a default.
And if you plug your laptop into a docking station while the lid is closed...?
And if you plug your laptop into a docking station while the lid is closed...?
Lockdown mode looks very usable despite the messaging that it is "designed for the very few individuals.”
Apple said at the rollout that relatively few people should need this, which is likely correct. The vast majority of people don’t have a state-level attacker going after them.
Also it makes sense that the UI/UX is accessible; many of the people who need this aren’t necessarily tech experts. And even if you are a tech expert, you don’t want a complex UI when you’re under attack.
Apple said at the rollout that relatively few people should need this, which is likely correct. The vast majority of people don’t have a state-level attacker going after them.
Also it makes sense that the UI/UX is accessible; many of the people who need this aren’t necessarily tech experts. And even if you are a tech expert, you don’t want a complex UI when you’re under attack.
catch
{
state-level attack
targeted attack
mass targeted malware/rootkits
}
If it works some of the time for state-level, it should work almost all of the time for anything below.
{
state-level attack
targeted attack
mass targeted malware/rootkits
}
If it works some of the time for state-level, it should work almost all of the time for anything below.
[deleted]
I'm eager to try this, but can someone please confirm if virtual-box is working without issue?
Is it possible to run this on a VM?
Did anyone else get a Safari window after the update with a iCloud page to setup family sharing?
yep, it opened to this page https://setup.icloud.com/family/cacheMugshotMarquee?aaaction... which responds with a HTTP/1.1 400 Bad Request
seems like a bug, weird that it didn't get picked up before GM as it was also noticed during the beta: https://developer.apple.com/forums/thread/712858
Some discussion of it from today, but no definitive answers yet https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/strange-safari-open-tab...
seems like a bug, weird that it didn't get picked up before GM as it was also noticed during the beta: https://developer.apple.com/forums/thread/712858
Some discussion of it from today, but no definitive answers yet https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/strange-safari-open-tab...
It doesn't happen when you update each beta in a row so it probably wasn't noticed. I didn't get it on my beta machine, just on my work machine.
how a better windows management looks like:
- show all windows of an app when switching windows (cmd+tab). currently only one window from each app is shown.
- transition period when switching windows via three fingers gesture is too long. make it snappier.
- show all windows of an app when switching windows (cmd+tab). currently only one window from each app is shown.
- transition period when switching windows via three fingers gesture is too long. make it snappier.
You may like https://alt-tab-macos.netlify.app/
When will Safari include Push Notifications on iOS? This SEEMS to say iOS 16.1 will, but I am not sure
https://webkit.org/blog/13399/webkit-features-in-safari-16-1...
https://webkit.org/blog/13399/webkit-features-in-safari-16-1...
No, it says Safari 16.1 for macOS.
Web Push won't come to iOS until a mid-cycle release, probably by March, maybe a bit sooner.
Personally I hope they have some sort of scoring to alert people if they are subscribed to notifications that others have reported as being scammy. They hopefully learned from the Calendar spam problems.
It's listed on this page (search for "2023"): https://www.apple.com/ios/ios-16/features/
Web Push won't come to iOS until a mid-cycle release, probably by March, maybe a bit sooner.
Personally I hope they have some sort of scoring to alert people if they are subscribed to notifications that others have reported as being scammy. They hopefully learned from the Calendar spam problems.
It's listed on this page (search for "2023"): https://www.apple.com/ios/ios-16/features/
Can't wait for all my non-technical friends to sign up for spam notifications. I moved them off Android for similar reasons.
> The Weather and Clock apps come to Mac with all of the features users know and love from iPhone, and do things like check local forecasts, create alarms, set timers, and more.
And yet there is no Apple weather app for iPad!
And yet there is no Apple weather app for iPad!
What? They just launched Apple Weather for iPad alongside this.
Noooooo, we finally get the weather app, and iPadOS 16 (needed for the app) drops my iPad (iPad Air 2)
I didn't know that. IDK why it took Apple 12 years to add a weather app to iPad.
I hear you that it took forever, they did a really good job with the dark sky acquisition and building a high quality app though. I find the new weather app more compelling than third party apps. Nice snappy radar, surprisingly good rain push notifications (I’ve gotten 5+ accurate push notifications for some unexpected San Diego rain this week!) and the air quality integration is far better than I would have anticipated!
[deleted]
download takes forever to complete. It's faster compiling it from source.
Stagemanager is very nice. I could see a "touchbar" right next to the trackpad. That would be very nice to switch apps
wow.....nothing I want....and lots I don't like.....good job......:/
[deleted]
To switch to another window, we already had Command-Tab, Mission Control, Expose (now part of Mission Control if I understand correctly), and also clicking on the icons in the Dock. And now we have Stage Manager. I had to use Windows 10 as my main workstation for a few weeks at work, and I'm starting to think windows management is – perhaps – one of the rare things Windows does better than macOS. But of course I should probably try Stage Manager before ranting about it here :)
A fairly good description of what's (optionally) new and what hasn't changed at all.
>Apple wisely takes an ain't-broke-don't-fix-it approach to macOS's standard multitasking model in Ventura by turning Stage Manager off by default and making people go hunting for it if they want to use it. You can't change your Mac's UI in a major way by accident.
If you haven't used it, Stage Manager differs from standard macOS multitasking by offering a column of recently used apps on the side of your screen (it's the left-hand side by default, but it will switch if you've got your Dock set to use the left-hand side of your screen instead). But unlike minimizing or maximizing an app from the Dock, each "stage" can contain multiple app windows from multiple apps; switch from one stage to another, and every window on that stage will pop back up on your screen in exactly the arrangement you were using before.
Within a given stage, app windows work exactly as they do anywhere else on your Mac. You can move, resize, and rearrange them any way you want, including shoving them all the way to the edges of the screen. The recent apps column will persist on the side of the screen by default, but it will get out of the way if you move an app window over it; you can bring the apps back up by moving your cursor to the right edge of the screen.
Stage Manager integrates seamlessly with macOS's other window management systems. Do you still want to use some apps in Full Screen mode? Great—they don't appear in your recent apps tray, and you can access them with a trackpad swipe, the same as you could before. Do you like Mission Control? Also cool. Apps in your tray slide gracefully up into Mission Control mode, along with any open apps that aren't in your tray.
https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2022/10/macos-13-ventura-the...
>Apple wisely takes an ain't-broke-don't-fix-it approach to macOS's standard multitasking model in Ventura by turning Stage Manager off by default and making people go hunting for it if they want to use it. You can't change your Mac's UI in a major way by accident.
If you haven't used it, Stage Manager differs from standard macOS multitasking by offering a column of recently used apps on the side of your screen (it's the left-hand side by default, but it will switch if you've got your Dock set to use the left-hand side of your screen instead). But unlike minimizing or maximizing an app from the Dock, each "stage" can contain multiple app windows from multiple apps; switch from one stage to another, and every window on that stage will pop back up on your screen in exactly the arrangement you were using before.
Within a given stage, app windows work exactly as they do anywhere else on your Mac. You can move, resize, and rearrange them any way you want, including shoving them all the way to the edges of the screen. The recent apps column will persist on the side of the screen by default, but it will get out of the way if you move an app window over it; you can bring the apps back up by moving your cursor to the right edge of the screen.
Stage Manager integrates seamlessly with macOS's other window management systems. Do you still want to use some apps in Full Screen mode? Great—they don't appear in your recent apps tray, and you can access them with a trackpad swipe, the same as you could before. Do you like Mission Control? Also cool. Apps in your tray slide gracefully up into Mission Control mode, along with any open apps that aren't in your tray.
https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2022/10/macos-13-ventura-the...
I disagree. Nothing beats macOS's multiple desktops that you can swap between by swiping with three fingers. I know exactly where my windows are, exactly how to get to them from anywhere, and their order is never changed. Leagues better than alt+tab.
One can swipe between virtual desktops on Windows 10 and 11 too, provided one has a Touchpad model from the last 10 years.
Just to add, I don't use a trackpad and I still use multiple desktops using the key shortcut ^ + Arrow Keys.
I still feel like this will be their unified desktop across all products, including AR/VR glasses.
If you take away the background, the way that it's arranged feels very AR-y to me.
If you take away the background, the way that it's arranged feels very AR-y to me.
Great shout. Just sounds like typical marketing nonsense naming on iPad/Mac and also doesn’t seem to immediately bring much to the table but makes total sense if this is the case. Fits in with Shakespeare’s famous observation that “all the world’s a stage”.
I concluded that Windows has a better window management too. It is no coincidence that Mac users have hundreds of windows open while Windows users stay relatively organized.
I tried out uBar for Mac OS https://ubarapp.com/. Too buggy though.
I tried out uBar for Mac OS https://ubarapp.com/. Too buggy though.
> It is no coincidence that Mac users have hundreds of windows open while Windows users stay relatively organized.
Personally, I leave tons of windows open because I feel no need to keep things "organized". I rarely feel the need to constantly micro manage things that are running because cmd+tab and cmd+` along with mission control/expose/spaces makes it pretty simple to find what I'm looking for. My individual windows go into pretty specific positions and they rarely move, and I also rarely fully close applications.
Personally, I leave tons of windows open because I feel no need to keep things "organized". I rarely feel the need to constantly micro manage things that are running because cmd+tab and cmd+` along with mission control/expose/spaces makes it pretty simple to find what I'm looking for. My individual windows go into pretty specific positions and they rarely move, and I also rarely fully close applications.
Windows has such great window management its users have much less windows open and thus manage much less windows than the MacOS, which has such bad window management its users manage hundreds of windows.
It does not make a whole lot of sense.
It does not make a whole lot of sense.
I see where you are coming from.
Windows has great window management = less chaos, less orphan open windows Mac OS has inferior window management = chaos, hundreds of open windows
The main reasons stems from the fact that Windows open window discoverability is higher. Open windows are always displayed in the menu bar. MacOS only displays the app icon but provides no information about the open windows except for pressing F3.
I hope that answer makes sense.
Windows has great window management = less chaos, less orphan open windows Mac OS has inferior window management = chaos, hundreds of open windows
The main reasons stems from the fact that Windows open window discoverability is higher. Open windows are always displayed in the menu bar. MacOS only displays the app icon but provides no information about the open windows except for pressing F3.
I hope that answer makes sense.
Mac OS displays exactly the same information, Windows groups windows under one icon as well. Windows shows miniatures of the windows on hover, Mac OS pops them all up to the foreground if you click the icon and lists them on right click/control click.
This theory makes little sense.
This theory makes little sense.
This theory is a subtle UX difference with larger outcomes. MacOS requires additional steps to see open windows while Windows does not.
The right click Mac OS solution is the best example. By default, right click on MacOS is deactivated. Even if someone right clicks on an app icon, that person has to click AND process the titles windows instead of seeing a visual preview as on Windows of the window.
The right click Mac OS solution is the best example. By default, right click on MacOS is deactivated. Even if someone right clicks on an app icon, that person has to click AND process the titles windows instead of seeing a visual preview as on Windows of the window.
So when you start asking questions, that terrible UI becomes a subtle UX difference.
That’s why this is all armchair designery about pet issues. You may like the way Windows works, that’s fine. But that doesn’t mean MacOS works ‘terribly’. It’s mostly just different from what you’re used to.
That’s why this is all armchair designery about pet issues. You may like the way Windows works, that’s fine. But that doesn’t mean MacOS works ‘terribly’. It’s mostly just different from what you’re used to.
What is your intention?
Nobody said that macOS has "terrible UI". Some people expressed that the window management in MacOS is inferior to Windows. I laid out UX reasons why macOS window management is inferior to Windows.
I will not participate in further discussion.
Nobody said that macOS has "terrible UI". Some people expressed that the window management in MacOS is inferior to Windows. I laid out UX reasons why macOS window management is inferior to Windows.
I will not participate in further discussion.
Upon review that is correct, apparently I confused this thread with another one.
Thanks for the clarification. I was irritated about the goal of the discussion :)
In my experience, the miniatures showed by Windows on hover are very convenient. I miss them a bit on Mac. And also the ability to quickly snap windows on sides or corners.
Don't forget CMD+` that switches to another window of the same application.
option + < on german systems/keyboards. keyboard shortcuts are not very accessible to the beginner user though. When my older relatives open youtube videos in fullscreen mode, they do not find their other browser window anymore
I think you've forgotten about Spaces.
I've been maximizing the windows for every app on the built-in screen since forever. More recently I've been using Rectangle when my MBP is connected to my new 27" screen. It works quite well but the layouts require a bit of nannying, I guess it's just a matter of me familiarizing myself with the keyboard shortcuts.
[1]: https://rectangleapp.com/
I've been maximizing the windows for every app on the built-in screen since forever. More recently I've been using Rectangle when my MBP is connected to my new 27" screen. It works quite well but the layouts require a bit of nannying, I guess it's just a matter of me familiarizing myself with the keyboard shortcuts.
[1]: https://rectangleapp.com/
Windows and KDE in linux do the window management best. They use essentially the same model for it.
That's definitely subjective.
For my usage/preferences, the Windows taskbar and alt-tab switcher scale extremely poorly. They drive me to keep no more than 3-4 windows open, because any additional windows beyond that make my desktop progressively more difficult to manage which feels utterly absurd on a tower with a 5950X and 32GB of RAM which I should feel empowered to heavily multitask with.
For my usage/preferences, the Windows taskbar and alt-tab switcher scale extremely poorly. They drive me to keep no more than 3-4 windows open, because any additional windows beyond that make my desktop progressively more difficult to manage which feels utterly absurd on a tower with a 5950X and 32GB of RAM which I should feel empowered to heavily multitask with.
Good point. Never thought about it. Probably did not use Windows long enough. What is not scaling well with that model? The miniatures are taking too much vertical space when hovering an app icon in the task bar?
For the taskbar, what doesn’t scale nicely is its window buttons.
Keeping the taskbar in its icon only default mode makes it basically like the Mac dock, which isn’t too bad, except that having more than one window open in a program which causes the button to “stack” for each window, then requiring an additional click or an awkward hover-dance to surface one of that program’s windows. If I disable stacking and enable window names, making it like the Win9x taskbar, I get back single click window summoning but the taskbar fills up very quickly and becomes noisy. Either way comes with drawbacks.
Alt-tab scales badly simply because of the sheer number of tab-taps it takes to switch to any given window when you have more than a handful of windows open. Without any logical grouping (like with macOS Command-Tab app grouping), it gets too full too quickly.
Windows also lacks a universal shortcut to cycle through only windows of a single application (Command-` on macOS) which I often miss.
Keeping the taskbar in its icon only default mode makes it basically like the Mac dock, which isn’t too bad, except that having more than one window open in a program which causes the button to “stack” for each window, then requiring an additional click or an awkward hover-dance to surface one of that program’s windows. If I disable stacking and enable window names, making it like the Win9x taskbar, I get back single click window summoning but the taskbar fills up very quickly and becomes noisy. Either way comes with drawbacks.
Alt-tab scales badly simply because of the sheer number of tab-taps it takes to switch to any given window when you have more than a handful of windows open. Without any logical grouping (like with macOS Command-Tab app grouping), it gets too full too quickly.
Windows also lacks a universal shortcut to cycle through only windows of a single application (Command-` on macOS) which I often miss.
Well, the new Mission Control is the same as the old Exposé, just a rebrand with a few changes. But you forgot Command-` (backtick) which cycles windows from the same (current) app.
My ability to accidentally hit Command-Q instead of Command-Tab, even after years of doing it astounds me. You'd think muscle memory, or at least the size of the keys would give my fingers and brain a clue, but nope. Some apps will give you quit prompts but many just disappear instantly, leaving me befuddled about what the hell I just did.
I assume some Chrome product manager is as clumsy as I am (bless their heart), so it will insist you hold down the Q key. If only that was the default.
I assume some Chrome product manager is as clumsy as I am (bless their heart), so it will insist you hold down the Q key. If only that was the default.
This. It's unacceptable that macOS still doesn't support basic window management and users have to install Tiles/Spectacles/Magnet/etc.
Completely agree. I use Rectangle, largely for the most basic thing that MacOS gets wrong: maximizing windows. It shouldn't be the same as "full screen". I know that you can double tap a window's top bar to maximize, but this should be swapped with the full-screen toggle. And cmd+shift+f should maximize the window instead of going to full-screen.
I feel I've regained some sanity with https://github.com/koekeishiya/yabai - even without messing with System Integrity Protection. It's a shame there's no real Api to enable proper screen/desktop/wm on macos though.
Those sound like advanced or niche window management tools - not ‘basic’?
And Linux does even better
[deleted]
There's a few nice quality of life features in Ventura, but MacOS really seems way down Apple's priority list nowadays.
They're using all software building resources for iOS and then just slap any reusable features on their desktop OS whenever possible. Great when it works for apps that are quite similar (e.g. messages), terrible for things that simply work very differently on a desktop OS (system settings, stage manager is pointless etc.).
Good opportunity for Windows to finally beat MacOS in UI/UX, since they don't have a mobile OS to worry about?
They're using all software building resources for iOS and then just slap any reusable features on their desktop OS whenever possible. Great when it works for apps that are quite similar (e.g. messages), terrible for things that simply work very differently on a desktop OS (system settings, stage manager is pointless etc.).
Good opportunity for Windows to finally beat MacOS in UI/UX, since they don't have a mobile OS to worry about?
I agree with most of your assessment, however:
> Good opportunity for Windows to finally beat MacOS in UI/UX, since they don't have a mobile OS to worry about?
Given how much of a step back every Windows release is, starting after Win2k, in terms of *consistency* of the user experience - I would argue both companies are their own worst enemies here.
> Good opportunity for Windows to finally beat MacOS in UI/UX, since they don't have a mobile OS to worry about?
Given how much of a step back every Windows release is, starting after Win2k, in terms of *consistency* of the user experience - I would argue both companies are their own worst enemies here.
Windows hasn't even ported all their Win2K GUIs to whatever their current UI framework is
Those tend to be the most usable parts of modern Windows releases.
[deleted]
Funnily enough I had just started reading the Ars Technica review when the upgrade took place so that helped with navigating the changes but it was an oddly jarring transition. I get that Apple doesn't like burdening users with too much technical information (as in 'any') but given how significantly the Settings app has changed I'm surprised there was no Release notes or feature tour of any kind.