[untitled]
4 comments
There is nothing in this article that suggests that ChatCGPT was in any way responsible. No details whatsoever, just a claim.
Presumably not ELIZA (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ELIZA), perhaps a character on character.ai or similar named Eliza?
This is, of course, a very sad story. It's certainly possible that ChatGPT was involved, although with OpenAI's neutering of the model, it seems more likely to be a different chatbot.
Either way, it's lazy of the article to not resolve this ambiguity, and seems rushed. It's not the case that "chatbot" = "ChatGPT" in 2023.
This is, of course, a very sad story. It's certainly possible that ChatGPT was involved, although with OpenAI's neutering of the model, it seems more likely to be a different chatbot.
Either way, it's lazy of the article to not resolve this ambiguity, and seems rushed. It's not the case that "chatbot" = "ChatGPT" in 2023.
>A young Belgian man recently died by suicide after talking to a chatbot named ELIZA
Is this chatbot named Eliza actually Eliza and not ChatGPT?
Is this chatbot named Eliza actually Eliza and not ChatGPT?
Yeah, ELIZA has been around since the 60s. I think the article reeks of a lack of due diligence and fact checking.