Design a keyboard with Ergogen v4(flatfootfox.com)
flatfootfox.com
Design a keyboard with Ergogen v4
https://flatfootfox.com/ergogen-introduction/
60 comments
I've been too afraid of asking on Reddit.
I'd love a split keyboard with an integrated trackball but the community is creating an overwhelming amount of new content and products.
I have not been able to find a good entry point. The threads often reference shops, specific people, firmwares or discord communities without going into details.
Does anyone happen to know a good resource for how and where to get started today? What's the state of the art, where to buy what etc.
I have not been able to find a good entry point. The threads often reference shops, specific people, firmwares or discord communities without going into details.
Does anyone happen to know a good resource for how and where to get started today? What's the state of the art, where to buy what etc.
As someone who has made a bunch of keyboards (including hand wiring), I agree that the space is very hard to navigate. Especially since /r/ErgoMechKeyboards/ has gone full "the only ergonomic keyboard is a hand-soldered keyboard that only 50 other people use", while for most people a prebuilt ergo keyboard would be fine and a large improvement over a $15 black slab.
What makes it worse is that most designs do no have any long-term group studies at all. E.g. Dactyl Manuform keyboards are quite popular, but many long-term users report thumb injuries from using Dactyl Manuforms. Who knows what injuries many of the custom designs can cause long-term? Most hobbyist keyboard designers are not trained medical professionals and basically don't have much of a clue what they are doing.
I would recommend people to start with prebuilt keyboards that have been around for a while and are pretty well-understood and in some cases had input from or testing by experts. Some examples:
- Fixed-split angled Microsoft keyboards (some models had extensive group studies, etc. Some models do break fairly quickly.)
- Logitech ERGO K860
- Kinesis Freestyle Edge RGB. This is traditional keyboard but with split and optional tenting (both of which have been shown to be good in various studies, be sure to get the tenting kit).
- Kinesis Advantage, goes all-in with ergonomic features and requires relearning typing a bit. Has been around in various forms for 30 years and is well-understood. Most people who use one swear by it.
- Keyboardio Model 100. The precursor (Model 01) has been around for many years. The design seems sane and I haven't seen many complaints.
- ZSA Ergodox EZ/Moonlander: these are quite popular. But be careful, quite many people report having thumb issues after a while.
I don't know any proven designs with trackballs, I have seen some people complain about integrated trackballs becoming uncomfortable after a while.
What makes it worse is that most designs do no have any long-term group studies at all. E.g. Dactyl Manuform keyboards are quite popular, but many long-term users report thumb injuries from using Dactyl Manuforms. Who knows what injuries many of the custom designs can cause long-term? Most hobbyist keyboard designers are not trained medical professionals and basically don't have much of a clue what they are doing.
I would recommend people to start with prebuilt keyboards that have been around for a while and are pretty well-understood and in some cases had input from or testing by experts. Some examples:
- Fixed-split angled Microsoft keyboards (some models had extensive group studies, etc. Some models do break fairly quickly.)
- Logitech ERGO K860
- Kinesis Freestyle Edge RGB. This is traditional keyboard but with split and optional tenting (both of which have been shown to be good in various studies, be sure to get the tenting kit).
- Kinesis Advantage, goes all-in with ergonomic features and requires relearning typing a bit. Has been around in various forms for 30 years and is well-understood. Most people who use one swear by it.
- Keyboardio Model 100. The precursor (Model 01) has been around for many years. The design seems sane and I haven't seen many complaints.
- ZSA Ergodox EZ/Moonlander: these are quite popular. But be careful, quite many people report having thumb issues after a while.
I don't know any proven designs with trackballs, I have seen some people complain about integrated trackballs becoming uncomfortable after a while.
There's no one-size-fits-all ergo keyboard, which is why the dactyl has a configurator. You need to make test prints for your hand / finger / thumb size and splay and decide accordingly. Same for the other non-bowl keyboards like corne/lily58/etc, some people just can't use them.
I've been using a corne for two years with absolutely no pain/issues (not that I had any issues before I started using it, though)
I've been using a corne for two years with absolutely no pain/issues (not that I had any issues before I started using it, though)
There's no one-size-fits-all ergo keyboard, which is why the dactyl has a configurator.
This is a bit of a trope in places like /r/ErgoMechKeyboards/. However, it's a bit of an empty statement without further data. Of course hand sizes/shapes differ, but the question is if they differ enough to preclude designs that work for a majority of the population. If you look at e.g. hand length/width datasets, within a group (e.g. men) these are close to a normal distribution. And the spread is not that large. e.g. the different in hand width in the ANSUR II 2012 dataset is 0.6cm between the 25th and the 75th percentile for men. The difference in hand length is 1.3 cm between the 25th and 75th percentile.
So, it's very likely to be possible to design a keyboard that fits most people well enough. Sure, if your hand size is an outlier you may have to get creative.
Besides that, there is also some latitude in designing ergo keyboards for multiple hand sizes. See eg. how Moergo iterated for several years so come up with a design that works for many different hand sizes [1].
[1] https://www.moergo.com/pages/glove80-ergonomic-keyboard-desi...
This is a bit of a trope in places like /r/ErgoMechKeyboards/. However, it's a bit of an empty statement without further data. Of course hand sizes/shapes differ, but the question is if they differ enough to preclude designs that work for a majority of the population. If you look at e.g. hand length/width datasets, within a group (e.g. men) these are close to a normal distribution. And the spread is not that large. e.g. the different in hand width in the ANSUR II 2012 dataset is 0.6cm between the 25th and the 75th percentile for men. The difference in hand length is 1.3 cm between the 25th and 75th percentile.
So, it's very likely to be possible to design a keyboard that fits most people well enough. Sure, if your hand size is an outlier you may have to get creative.
Besides that, there is also some latitude in designing ergo keyboards for multiple hand sizes. See eg. how Moergo iterated for several years so come up with a design that works for many different hand sizes [1].
[1] https://www.moergo.com/pages/glove80-ergonomic-keyboard-desi...
Hand sizes differ a lot, and finger mobility does too. Also, the length of the ring finger is different for different people. So yeah, there's a definite requirement for different keyboards for different people. And it's not a "meme" or a trope, it does make a huge difference. Plus, it depends on the layout you use (or are hoping to build) and the work that you do with your keyboard, and the kinds of features you're using (tap dance, macros, expansion, combos, etc) and how many of them you can remember. Sure, you can go with a bog-standard split and it'll be MUCH better than a regular QWERTY. But if your needs dictate a better keyboard, it doesn't mean you're hyperoptimizing.
Hand width and size are not the only things to take into account.
The resting curl of your hand is important, as is relative finger lengths (particularly of the pinky).
And then there's resting thumb position relative to the fingers.
The resting curl of your hand is important, as is relative finger lengths (particularly of the pinky).
And then there's resting thumb position relative to the fingers.
The same applies to all these dimensions. They are not completely random and most will be normally distributed when measured. Also, as I said keyboards can accommodate multiple lenghts e.g. by having multiple thumb keys where you use a subset of them.
At any rate, I have seen plenty of folks who had issues like wrist pains, etc. that were resolved by improving posture, taking regular breaks, doing exercises and switching to a split, tented keyboard (just a boring one with a traditional layout like a Freestyle).
Only people who went (too?) far down the rabbit hole do all these micro-optimizations and proclaim that their keyboard is 'the end game' after having used it for a few weeks. Until the next end game :).
At any rate, I have seen plenty of folks who had issues like wrist pains, etc. that were resolved by improving posture, taking regular breaks, doing exercises and switching to a split, tented keyboard (just a boring one with a traditional layout like a Freestyle).
Only people who went (too?) far down the rabbit hole do all these micro-optimizations and proclaim that their keyboard is 'the end game' after having used it for a few weeks. Until the next end game :).
They may be normally distributed, but most people have at least one or two outlier parameters that customization could help with.
Personally I just suggest going to a keyboard meetup and trying out a bunch of ergos and picking the design you find most comfortable.
I lucked into the Mitosis layout in 2017 (literally, I won it in a raffle) and have used it ever since. True endgame.
Personally I just suggest going to a keyboard meetup and trying out a bunch of ergos and picking the design you find most comfortable.
I lucked into the Mitosis layout in 2017 (literally, I won it in a raffle) and have used it ever since. True endgame.
Could you show the data this statement is based on?
|most people have at least one or two outlier parameters that customization could |help with.
|most people have at least one or two outlier parameters that customization could |help with.
It's simple statistics. The chance of every parameter not being an outlier is small.
https://www.thestar.com/news/insight/2016/01/16/when-us-air-...
"Even more surprising, when Daniels averaged all his data, the average hand did not resemble any individual’s measurements. There was no such thing as an average hand size."
https://www.thestar.com/news/insight/2016/01/16/when-us-air-...
"Even more surprising, when Daniels averaged all his data, the average hand did not resemble any individual’s measurements. There was no such thing as an average hand size."
I'm really looking for a good ergonomic keyboard right now (split or non-split). I'm using Redox, but the bamboo case is falling apart and sometimes I miss F-keys (it'd be nice to one-shot steps during debugging rather than having to press a key combination) or a physical numpad (for entering numbers I prefer the numpad, but I just don't love switching layers).
The Ergo K860 looks nice. I've also been eyeing the Kinesis Advantage 360, though it has no F-Keys. Another option would be the Glove80. The MS/Logitech keyboards are super cheap in comparison. Would you say not having ortholinear keys is a big difference for ergonomics?
The Ergo K860 looks nice. I've also been eyeing the Kinesis Advantage 360, though it has no F-Keys. Another option would be the Glove80. The MS/Logitech keyboards are super cheap in comparison. Would you say not having ortholinear keys is a big difference for ergonomics?
Would you say not having ortholinear keys is a big difference for ergonomics?
I don't think there is much proof in terms of scientific studies that column stagger is better (column stagger is usually preferable over ortholinear), so can only really give my personal experience. I strongly prefer column stagger, I can still type row stagger and sometimes use my laptop's keyboard when I travel, but all these lateral movements feel awkward now.
I've also been eyeing the Kinesis Advantage 360
The 360 is really nice (I have a 360 Pro), but I'd order it somewhere where you can return it easily (eg. Kinesis themselves). For me, the Gateron Browns in the 360 are quite a large regression compared to the Cherry Browns in the Advantage2. The Gaterons are smoother, but their actuation point is way lower. Gateron specs say 2mm, but it's closer to 3mm in practice. This makes typing on the 360 quite tiring for me. So it's mostly collecting dust currently (I am using the Advantage2 and the Model 100 most of the time). But this is really personal, some other people do like the Gateron switches.
I wrote up a short review of the 360 Pro here:
https://danieldk.eu/Posts/2023-04-15-Advantage-360-Pro.html
I don't think there is much proof in terms of scientific studies that column stagger is better (column stagger is usually preferable over ortholinear), so can only really give my personal experience. I strongly prefer column stagger, I can still type row stagger and sometimes use my laptop's keyboard when I travel, but all these lateral movements feel awkward now.
I've also been eyeing the Kinesis Advantage 360
The 360 is really nice (I have a 360 Pro), but I'd order it somewhere where you can return it easily (eg. Kinesis themselves). For me, the Gateron Browns in the 360 are quite a large regression compared to the Cherry Browns in the Advantage2. The Gaterons are smoother, but their actuation point is way lower. Gateron specs say 2mm, but it's closer to 3mm in practice. This makes typing on the 360 quite tiring for me. So it's mostly collecting dust currently (I am using the Advantage2 and the Model 100 most of the time). But this is really personal, some other people do like the Gateron switches.
I wrote up a short review of the 360 Pro here:
https://danieldk.eu/Posts/2023-04-15-Advantage-360-Pro.html
I really like my regular Kinesis Advantage 2 which does have F-keys although admittedly small ones. I don't use them too much. They are easy to reach which I like though.
I think having Ortho layout makes using the numpad on the Kinesis a lot better. The big ergo benefit to me is the thumb clusters and the fact I can remap keys like (),[],{},~ to be easier to press. I have setup the "delete" key on the thumb cluster to be a layer shift and moved symbols to easier to press fingers than ridiculous pinky extensions. The numpad is also easy to use since I just hit delete and then it's already under my right hand and I don't have to move it. Since it's Ortho it feels like a numpad. Previously I never really used the numpad because I didn't like moving my hand over but now most of my numbers are typed that way.
I don't think MS/Logitech boards go far enough even in the split department.
I think having Ortho layout makes using the numpad on the Kinesis a lot better. The big ergo benefit to me is the thumb clusters and the fact I can remap keys like (),[],{},~ to be easier to press. I have setup the "delete" key on the thumb cluster to be a layer shift and moved symbols to easier to press fingers than ridiculous pinky extensions. The numpad is also easy to use since I just hit delete and then it's already under my right hand and I don't have to move it. Since it's Ortho it feels like a numpad. Previously I never really used the numpad because I didn't like moving my hand over but now most of my numbers are typed that way.
I don't think MS/Logitech boards go far enough even in the split department.
I've found that the best "split" keyboard is simply to use two decent keyboards on the same computer. When I am in a situation where I'm doing tons of typing (not that often anymore) I'll have the two keyboards a bit more than a body width apart. Unfortunately macos doesn't apply modifier keys (shift / meta / ctl) from one device to the other (IE if I press left shift on the left keyboard I don't get a capital L if I press it on the right keyboard). Windows did this just fine.
For just general sysadmining around, one keyboard's been fine for me. Frequent breaks, standing up and moving, etc, have much more of an impact on fatigue than the quality of the keyboard. That said, I've found that the 1990s model M4-1 to be an absolutely spectacular keyboard.
For just general sysadmining around, one keyboard's been fine for me. Frequent breaks, standing up and moving, etc, have much more of an impact on fatigue than the quality of the keyboard. That said, I've found that the 1990s model M4-1 to be an absolutely spectacular keyboard.
Can you use something like Karabiner Elements to fuse the two keyboards together into one virtual one? I do something similar on Linux with mice for middle mouse button scrolling since my Ploopy Nano doesn't have buttons.
In my youth I'd endlessly try to optimize things. You should see my fvwm setup. "Chef's kiss" perfection.
Regarding 2 keyboards -- mostly it just works. Try it. If you're like me you probably have a stack of random garbage keyboards within 30 feet of wherever you've got your work desk. Plug 'em in and type away. For me, anyhow, it works just fine - my left hand doesn't actually need to be within a foot of my right hand.
Regarding 2 keyboards -- mostly it just works. Try it. If you're like me you probably have a stack of random garbage keyboards within 30 feet of wherever you've got your work desk. Plug 'em in and type away. For me, anyhow, it works just fine - my left hand doesn't actually need to be within a foot of my right hand.
I don't think MS/Logitech boards go far enough even in the split department.
I agree that the split of the Advantage is nicer. However, the MS/Logitech boards do not only split, they also put the halves at an angle, compensating quite a bit for their relatively narrow split. There are some papers that investigate these compromises.
In the end it depends on the amount that you want to spend. A 420 Euro Advantage2 is probably going to be better. But the Microsoft/Logitech/Alice boards are a good compromise if you do not want to spend more than 100-200 Euro on a keyboard. Though at the 200 price point it's probably better to stretch it a little and get something split and tented like the Freestyle Edge, which sometimes goes for 200 + 30 for the tenting set from some vendors.
(Sometimes you get lucky, I found a mint Keyboardio Model 100 on a local marketplace for 150 Euro with the octo feet. It's over 500 Euro after VAT and shipping when you import it to The Netherlands.)
I agree that the split of the Advantage is nicer. However, the MS/Logitech boards do not only split, they also put the halves at an angle, compensating quite a bit for their relatively narrow split. There are some papers that investigate these compromises.
In the end it depends on the amount that you want to spend. A 420 Euro Advantage2 is probably going to be better. But the Microsoft/Logitech/Alice boards are a good compromise if you do not want to spend more than 100-200 Euro on a keyboard. Though at the 200 price point it's probably better to stretch it a little and get something split and tented like the Freestyle Edge, which sometimes goes for 200 + 30 for the tenting set from some vendors.
(Sometimes you get lucky, I found a mint Keyboardio Model 100 on a local marketplace for 150 Euro with the octo feet. It's over 500 Euro after VAT and shipping when you import it to The Netherlands.)
[deleted]
Thank you very much for the detailed response. I'll look at all those options. I've been using a Microsoft Natural Ergonomic Keyboard 4000 for ages and it is slowly disintegrating so I'll need a replacement in the next few years.
The quality has been great. It's lasted 15 or so years now.
I switched to an optimized keyboard layout (neo2 - German) in 2006 when I had carpal tunnel syndrome in both hands and then also switched to one of those ergonomic keyboards.
Now, I'm basically looking for a successor.
The quality has been great. It's lasted 15 or so years now.
I switched to an optimized keyboard layout (neo2 - German) in 2006 when I had carpal tunnel syndrome in both hands and then also switched to one of those ergonomic keyboards.
Now, I'm basically looking for a successor.
Check out the Feker Alice 98. It just came out (my pre-order arrived just last Friday) and is an excellent modern recreation of my favorite keyboard, the Microsoft Natural line of keyboards from circa 2000. There's a separate model without the numpad, if you don't use that (I do).
Complaints? No Home/End. The extra B on the right side is weird. The proximity of the arrow keys means sometimes I hit the left arrow-key when pressing backspace. But those are all easy to adjust to, I think. I'm excited to finally have a good, modern replacement for the Natural keyboards. Highly recommend this one.
Complaints? No Home/End. The extra B on the right side is weird. The proximity of the arrow keys means sometimes I hit the left arrow-key when pressing backspace. But those are all easy to adjust to, I think. I'm excited to finally have a good, modern replacement for the Natural keyboards. Highly recommend this one.
My ~2000-era MS Natural keyboard has the following. (I keep it in a drawer, as an emergency spare for when I run out of MS Natural 4000s.)
- Full navigation cluster
- Arrow keys away from the main area
- Ctrl+Shift in line on both sides
- Right-hand Alt key
- Right-hand Windows key and right-hand Windows context key (you don't need both IMO, however having one is useful as you can remap it to be the right-hand version of the one you do use - the MS Natural 4000 is fine)
- Only one B key
- f6 on the left side of the split
For a device that relies so much on muscle memory, you'd think that designers would do a better job of laying theirs out exactly like every other one. But... apparently not?
My search for a replacement continues.
- Full navigation cluster
- Arrow keys away from the main area
- Ctrl+Shift in line on both sides
- Right-hand Alt key
- Right-hand Windows key and right-hand Windows context key (you don't need both IMO, however having one is useful as you can remap it to be the right-hand version of the one you do use - the MS Natural 4000 is fine)
- Only one B key
- f6 on the left side of the split
For a device that relies so much on muscle memory, you'd think that designers would do a better job of laying theirs out exactly like every other one. But... apparently not?
My search for a replacement continues.
> My ~2000-era MS Natural keyboard has the following. (I keep it in a drawer, as an emergency spare for when I run out of MS Natural 4000s.)
Hahaha! I have the same thing. I've got one original MS Natural still BNIB, and two Elite models each with a lot of mileage on them. I've long been dreading the day that my stash runs dry. Been keeping an eye on keyboard forums for years waiting for a replacement. The popularity of high-end keyboards with the terrible rectangle layout utterly baffles me. Why would someone who cares about keyboards ever choose that layout?
The Alice layout comes close enough to the Natural layout that I think it's a fantastic replacement. My complaints are small enough that I'm already adjusting after just a few hours of usage. I'm just thrilled someone is making a split ergo keyboard with a numpad!!
Hahaha! I have the same thing. I've got one original MS Natural still BNIB, and two Elite models each with a lot of mileage on them. I've long been dreading the day that my stash runs dry. Been keeping an eye on keyboard forums for years waiting for a replacement. The popularity of high-end keyboards with the terrible rectangle layout utterly baffles me. Why would someone who cares about keyboards ever choose that layout?
The Alice layout comes close enough to the Natural layout that I think it's a fantastic replacement. My complaints are small enough that I'm already adjusting after just a few hours of usage. I'm just thrilled someone is making a split ergo keyboard with a numpad!!
Indeed. The weird navigation keys are weird, as they're in funny places and half of them are missing. And I might have some suggestions about better places to put the arrow keys. But there's a numeric keypad, and there's a full set of F keys! Progress!
How about a split mech like Mister Barroco? Easy to find in online shops. It splits and you can have a trackball in the middle.
Can you elaborate on the thumb problems from Manuforms? This is the first I’ve heard of them. I’m in the process of building a corne Manuform.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=foSmpE_aefI
And basically a lot of reports on Reddit. Eg.:
https://old.reddit.com/r/ErgoMechKeyboards/comments/ubcxup/e... https://old.reddit.com/r/ErgoMechKeyboards/comments/umg2j5/e... https://old.reddit.com/r/ErgoMechKeyboards/comments/lj3n45/p...
Of course, these are just anecdotes and we don't have good research into all the individual designs, but there seems to be a pattern. The movement is also similar to what causes texter's thumb.
At any rate, I am not an ergonomics professional, so if you are switching to a more ergonomic keyboard because you have pains, you should ask and expert what works and what doesn't.
And basically a lot of reports on Reddit. Eg.:
https://old.reddit.com/r/ErgoMechKeyboards/comments/ubcxup/e... https://old.reddit.com/r/ErgoMechKeyboards/comments/umg2j5/e... https://old.reddit.com/r/ErgoMechKeyboards/comments/lj3n45/p...
Of course, these are just anecdotes and we don't have good research into all the individual designs, but there seems to be a pattern. The movement is also similar to what causes texter's thumb.
At any rate, I am not an ergonomics professional, so if you are switching to a more ergonomic keyboard because you have pains, you should ask and expert what works and what doesn't.
Thanks!
You’re really on one on this thread lol.
I’ve found that anecdote gets the job done for me. The $ values are insignificant for me considering it’s all work-related. The RSI has come and gone through multiple iterations of work intensity and keyboard (and accessory) configurations.
I suspect this is the main reason there isn’t much research in the space. The breadth is too large to research when trial and error quickly arrives at a workable solution for 99% of people.
With a little bit of technical insight into RSI, common sense goes a long way into finding tech configurations that work.
You’re really on one on this thread lol.
I’ve found that anecdote gets the job done for me. The $ values are insignificant for me considering it’s all work-related. The RSI has come and gone through multiple iterations of work intensity and keyboard (and accessory) configurations.
I suspect this is the main reason there isn’t much research in the space. The breadth is too large to research when trial and error quickly arrives at a workable solution for 99% of people.
With a little bit of technical insight into RSI, common sense goes a long way into finding tech configurations that work.
If you mean "I saw a keyboard someone else had, I'd like one too", then you're probably going to get good results if you send a message like "wow, this is really cool, how do I go about making one of these".
Generally, the shops I've seen are all quite happy to sell parts, & provide assembly guides. I think those are good starting points for learning about the things you don't know.
Generally, the shops I've seen are all quite happy to sell parts, & provide assembly guides. I think those are good starting points for learning about the things you don't know.
My advice to you is to get either a Keychron Q10 or Q11, then get a Ploopy trackball to place between/below the keyboard.
https://www.keychron.com/products/keychron-q11-qmk-custom-me...
https://www.keychron.com/products/keychron-q10-alice-layout-...
https://ploopy.co/mini-trackball/ <-- this one has buttons and a scroll wheel.
I have a Keychron Q10 and program it with the "via" software, which works great. I also have a Ploopy mouse, which requires QMK compilation to customize. That worked out great for me, because I love tinkering.
It's really difficult to encapsulate all that goes into a keyboard and mouse/trackball, like you said the communities create huge amounts of information, commentary, and designs. Which is why companies like Keychron are doing great work creating "layman" accessible keyboards.
QMK is literally compiling C code into firmware. You can leave off LED effects if you want, use complex macros, rules, and layers, or cut out everything that you don't use. I mentioned my mouse earlier: it has 2 layers, the second of which is accessed by holding down a button. That gives me access to almost twice as many buttons! I have a volume control on my mouse's second layer, plus "paste plain text on MacOS". Very cool stuff and incredibly useful!
Via is a QMK that is designed to be updated without the C toolchain present. It uses an Electron front end and is pretty straightforward to use. Obviously it's more restricted in what it can do, but I think it covers 99.9% of use cases.
I wish I could write more, but I have to go for surgery. If you ask questions here, I should be able to respond by late evening US eastern time May 1st.
https://www.keychron.com/products/keychron-q11-qmk-custom-me...
https://www.keychron.com/products/keychron-q10-alice-layout-...
https://ploopy.co/mini-trackball/ <-- this one has buttons and a scroll wheel.
I have a Keychron Q10 and program it with the "via" software, which works great. I also have a Ploopy mouse, which requires QMK compilation to customize. That worked out great for me, because I love tinkering.
It's really difficult to encapsulate all that goes into a keyboard and mouse/trackball, like you said the communities create huge amounts of information, commentary, and designs. Which is why companies like Keychron are doing great work creating "layman" accessible keyboards.
QMK is literally compiling C code into firmware. You can leave off LED effects if you want, use complex macros, rules, and layers, or cut out everything that you don't use. I mentioned my mouse earlier: it has 2 layers, the second of which is accessed by holding down a button. That gives me access to almost twice as many buttons! I have a volume control on my mouse's second layer, plus "paste plain text on MacOS". Very cool stuff and incredibly useful!
Via is a QMK that is designed to be updated without the C toolchain present. It uses an Electron front end and is pretty straightforward to use. Obviously it's more restricted in what it can do, but I think it covers 99.9% of use cases.
I wish I could write more, but I have to go for surgery. If you ask questions here, I should be able to respond by late evening US eastern time May 1st.
Maybe https://www.reddit.com/r/ErgoMechKeyboards/ will be less intimidating? There are several designs on that subreddit if you search for "trackball." like this one: https://www.reddit.com/r/ErgoMechKeyboards/comments/12uqw3c/...
That looks interesting!
For me a pre-built one would probably be ideal, otherwise it'll end up with all the other half finished projects.
https://www.etsy.com/shop/Wylderbuilds is a place I've used in the past. They sell parts and completed keyboards, but also have a link out to github with their modifications, at https://github.com/bullwinkle3000/dactyl-keyboard. The whole dactyl space is definitely a rabbit hole, though.
> I've been too afraid of asking on Reddit. I'd love a split keyboard with an integrated trackball (...)
I'd already be happy if there were mechanical keyboards out there that offered USB passthrough to connect things like yubikeys, a trackpad or headphones. So far the only one I'm aware that has those is the Royal Kludge rk84, but I doesn't seem to be a popular choice.
I'd already be happy if there were mechanical keyboards out there that offered USB passthrough to connect things like yubikeys, a trackpad or headphones. So far the only one I'm aware that has those is the Royal Kludge rk84, but I doesn't seem to be a popular choice.
The Fnatic Rush G1 has a USB hub. I have my BIO-key SideTouch connected, and plug a wireless mouse dongle into the other port as the range isn't good enough to reach the next room where my computer lives.
Thanks for mentioning the Fnatic Rush G1 keyboard. It sounds interesting, but it doesn't seem to be featured in their site anymore.
https://fnatic.com/collections/keyboards
From the looks of their product page, I'm not sure what to think about their keyboards.
https://fnatic.com/collections/keyboards
From the looks of their product page, I'm not sure what to think about their keyboards.
Not current, but can still be had frequently as new old stock.
The current line is garish, but their origin is in dogfooding the hardware for their professional CSGO players ("team Fnatic").
I've been using it since it launched (~2016). Still works great, mine uses Cherry MX Blue switches, so if you do wear out a switch, it's an easy fix.
The current line is garish, but their origin is in dogfooding the hardware for their professional CSGO players ("team Fnatic").
I've been using it since it launched (~2016). Still works great, mine uses Cherry MX Blue switches, so if you do wear out a switch, it's an easy fix.
I love the unibody design of the Cocot 46 Plus: https://kbd.news/Cocot46plus-1455.html
However the board is not yet open source, like many Japanes custom boards.
However the board is not yet open source, like many Japanes custom boards.
Not sure if this is exactly what you're after, but check out https://bastardkb.com/ and their discord community.
Which subreddit are you looking at? I am also interested in an ergo keyboard with an integrated trackball.
What I've done is take a Kinesis Advantage2 and add an Apple Magic Trackpad, like this: [1]
I use museum wax as the mounting method, which allows slight adjustments but is otherwise a firm hold.
[1] https://www.reddit.com/r/kinesisadvantage/comments/s2n2k3/ki...
I use museum wax as the mounting method, which allows slight adjustments but is otherwise a firm hold.
[1] https://www.reddit.com/r/kinesisadvantage/comments/s2n2k3/ki...
So it's only a small movement with one of your hands for mouse control? Seems like a simple solution.
I've been subscribed to https://www.reddit.com/r/ErgoMechKeyboards for a year or so now and there is a lot of energy there.
It's just really hard to follow when you're only casually browsing.
It's just really hard to follow when you're only casually browsing.
Check out the Samoklava GitHub repository (https://github.com/soundmonster/samoklava) for an example of auto-generated and auto-routed board leveraging Ergogen.
I am following on the steps of FlatFootFox to replicate the Corne (Cherry) in code, WIP for the moment: https://github.com/ceoloide/corney-island
Don't forget to support the creator of Ergogen, MrZealot: https://github.com/sponsors/mrzealot
I am following on the steps of FlatFootFox to replicate the Corne (Cherry) in code, WIP for the moment: https://github.com/ceoloide/corney-island
Don't forget to support the creator of Ergogen, MrZealot: https://github.com/sponsors/mrzealot
What does routing mean in this context?
PCB trace routing
Right. Basically routing (i.e. connecting pads / terminals of various electronic components) is a relatively hard problem and usually gets done by hand.
Ergogen lacks the ability to spit out routed PCBs, but the Samoklava repositories shows how to use a KiCad CLI addon to do just that and generate final files ready for fabrication (though you should always inspect them).
Ergogen lacks the ability to spit out routed PCBs, but the Samoklava repositories shows how to use a KiCad CLI addon to do just that and generate final files ready for fabrication (though you should always inspect them).
I developed something similar (PCB only, no cases) as KiCad plugin: https://github.com/adamws/kicad-kbplacer - it uses layouts from keyboard-layout-editor.com as input.
It has web interface as well: https://keyboard-tools.xyz/
The one thing that keeps me from building my own keyboard is that I’d want a 3D-curved keyboard (similar to the Microsoft ergonomic keyboards), and I haven’t seen anyone tackling such a project yet. Ergogen as well seems to only support “flat” layouts.
See the dactyl tool linked as a sibling comment: https://ryanis.cool/dactyl by https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35769435
Is there a way to ask for a reasonably-priced custom made keyboard?
I have a key layout in mind, and I just want a ready product, not to fiddle with hardware and firmware myself.
The order lot is very tiny of maybe 4-5 pcs.
The layout is quite simple QWERTY, based on Omnikey Ultra T.
I have a key layout in mind, and I just want a ready product, not to fiddle with hardware and firmware myself.
The order lot is very tiny of maybe 4-5 pcs.
The layout is quite simple QWERTY, based on Omnikey Ultra T.
How much do you think would be reasonably-priced?
In a range of 100-150 US$ a piece.
Perhaps 500-800 US$ for 5 finished keyboards.
Similar to this Omnikey Ultra T, in a similar build quality, but with few keys rearranged. I wish the F11 and F12 on the life side to be below F9 and F10 keys.
https://www.thurrott.com/forums/general-discussion/hardware/...
I like the heavy metal bottom plate, but can be (cheaper) molded plastic.
My current Ultra T is at end of life, I am resoldering the gradually failing white ALPS.
Perhaps 500-800 US$ for 5 finished keyboards.
Similar to this Omnikey Ultra T, in a similar build quality, but with few keys rearranged. I wish the F11 and F12 on the life side to be below F9 and F10 keys.
https://www.thurrott.com/forums/general-discussion/hardware/...
I like the heavy metal bottom plate, but can be (cheaper) molded plastic.
My current Ultra T is at end of life, I am resoldering the gradually failing white ALPS.
[deleted]
It's frustrating that nobody ever explains how to make your own key caps.
Key caps have lower tolerances than the rest of the board, and the slot for the stems is a very small (the whole cross is 4.1mm wide with the "arms" of it being 1.17mm [1]) negative space, which 3d printing isn't great at. It's certainly possible and I know Zach Freedman [2] did this using his publicly available/free mx keycap model [3], but honestly unless you're more committed to having a board totally made by you than having one that sounds/looks good (which is totally reasonable, making one just to be able to build one from scratch yourself is something I want to do too), I'd say buy some.
1: https://www.cherrymx.de/en/dev.html 2: https://youtu.be/yYcNi9hKxDk?t=688 3: https://thangs.com/designer/ZackFreedman/3d-model/KeyV2%20G2...
1: https://www.cherrymx.de/en/dev.html 2: https://youtu.be/yYcNi9hKxDk?t=688 3: https://thangs.com/designer/ZackFreedman/3d-model/KeyV2%20G2...
There is a company in California that let you design your own keycaps.
It is called MaxKeyboard.
I see they do printed keycaps, is there any company that would allow having custom see-through forms in the keycaps that would support keyboard lights? E.g., in addition to QW letters that glow in the dark you could add your custom symbols that would also help you learn all the custom keybinds you've made
WASD Keyboards [1] (also in California, BTW) offers custom-printed whole sets and individual keys in OEM profile Cherry keycaps.
XVX [2] offers sets of four in Cherry profile
.. and I'm sure there are more options out there.
Then there's the whole "artisan" community, which sculpt and cast individual keycaps in various designs and shapes, more for looks and collecting than for typing on. I've seen group buys of tooling for making these.
1. <https://www.wasdkeyboards.com>
2. <https://en.xvxchannel.com/en-eu/products/xvx-custom-art-icon...>
Then there's the whole "artisan" community, which sculpt and cast individual keycaps in various designs and shapes, more for looks and collecting than for typing on. I've seen group buys of tooling for making these.
1. <https://www.wasdkeyboards.com>
2. <https://en.xvxchannel.com/en-eu/products/xvx-custom-art-icon...>
I think concave keyboards tend to be more ergonomic than 2d layouts, but to each their own.