VIM Master(github.com)
github.com
VIM Master
https://github.com/renzorlive/vimmaster
122 comments
https://vim-adventures.com/ deserves a mention (as I see, it is already 12 years old, https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5689971)
That’s how I mastered the basics of vim! Game still holds up today.
I'm surprised they don't even mention vimtutor. It's preinstalled on every machine with vim (to the best of my knowledge). This seems like a cool project, but might as well give a shout-out to the original concept.
I actually opened this hoping it’ an alternative to vimtutor but for experienced/intermediate users.
Is there such a thing? I feel like someone has probably made something this - something that progressively works through soem of the more complex features of vim.
I’ve found soem absolute gems mostly through online blogs and reading through vim docs
If anyone has any repos that’d recommended I’d be happy to try!
Is there such a thing? I feel like someone has probably made something this - something that progressively works through soem of the more complex features of vim.
I’ve found soem absolute gems mostly through online blogs and reading through vim docs
If anyone has any repos that’d recommended I’d be happy to try!
There is always https://vim-adventures.com/
>> hoping it’ an alternative to vimtutor but for experienced/intermediate users.
vimtutor is to Babbel what this is to duolingo. Many will prefer learning through a game but some want a more textbook approach. Honestly, anything to get more people on vim and emacs is a good thing in my book!
> vimtutor is to Babbel what this is to duolingo
It took me half a minute to realize that you probably meant "vimtutor is to VIM master what Babbel is to duolingo".
It took me half a minute to realize that you probably meant "vimtutor is to VIM master what Babbel is to duolingo".
Isn't it exactly the same thing? If a:b=c:d then a:c=b:d.
The problem is that it's not the relationship between vimtutor and Babbel that you're comparing to the relationship between vimmaster and Duolingo.
Thats exactly what I meant to say. Thanks!
Unfortunately vimtutor was dropped by the neovim fork
There is also this one
https://vim-adventures.com/
https://vim-adventures.com/
I think this one asks you to pay for it after a bit. Not that there's anything wrong with that. Just felt bad about getting a little bit in, and then being hit with a decent pay wall.
Right, I mean, author has the right to do this -- but it still seems like a gloriously stupid thing to try to get someone to pay for in this way; like what market is this?
Like, I'd bet "Pay $10 if you like it" / ReaperWare would earn this person literally an order of magnitude more money.
Like, I'd bet "Pay $10 if you like it" / ReaperWare would earn this person literally an order of magnitude more money.
Yep. I was trying to buy some licenses for my school, and they only offerend subscriptions in which I am not interested. A shame! Such a great game.
>ReaperWare
What does this mean? All I found on the Google was a company that produces sim racing gear.
What does this mean? All I found on the Google was a company that produces sim racing gear.
Presumable the pricing model for Reaper? https://www.reaper.fm/purchase.php
haha you got it
Wait, I'm the first to say that? That should be a thing.
Wait, I'm the first to say that? That should be a thing.
Thank you for the warning.
I found a pricing dialog after clicking “buy a license”, it said that six months of full access to the game costs $35.
I found a pricing dialog after clicking “buy a license”, it said that six months of full access to the game costs $35.
Personally, I would happily pay for vim-adventures, but never monthly. It provides one-time value, it should have one-time cost. I'd much rather pay a one-time cost and get a downloadable local copy.
I paid for it, was worth it for me. Reason: I did vimtutor 4 times and was learning but found it super painful/boring, but really wanted to learn vim keybindings. Vim adventures made learning keybindings and muscle memory just tolerable that I could do 1h in the evening even after a long/busy/tedious day. I probably would have persisted learning vim keybindings without it, but it definitely made doing so less painful.
A free alternative for learning just hjkl, nethack supports this way of moving[1]. Remember to keep your index finger on ‘j’ (don’t shift your hand to ‘h’), to build the muscle memory.
[1]: https://nethackwiki.com/wiki/Direction
[1]: https://nethackwiki.com/wiki/Direction
I paid once, but it's valid only for 6 months. I would reuse it once in a while for fun, but I won't pay again and again.
This was quite weird and honestly a bit infuriating. Just felt like it was encouraging really bad habits in vim.
You start out and you only have `h,j,k,l` available to you (despite what the help says). So just end up holding the keys and maybe that's fine but then that first level is WAY too big.
Like I got to the second area and it starts talking about word motions and then you try `w,b,e` and it then tells you those keys aren't available. That's not even the first character you talk to that is mentioning movement keys while those keys remain unavailable to you!
I rage quit after unlocking `w,b,e` and moving back to that chest at the beginning only to realize I had forgotten there was a space between the word and punctuation meaning I'd need to unlock something like `B`, `0`, `^`, or even the ability to use numbers which a character had already mentioned to me...
[1/10] do not recommend. I believe most people will be able to read half of `vimtutor` before you will unlock the `b` key in this game as well as have a much better understanding of how vim actually works.
I highly suggest vimtutor to people because what a lot of people miss while learning vim is that there isn't actually much to remember. There's sets of motion keys and sets of command keys. The beauty of vim is that the commands are putting these together. For example, say you learn `b,w,e` and then you learn `d`. You now automatically know `db, dw, de, dd`. You didn't learn 4 new things, you learned 1 new thing. Similarly learning `B,W,E` isn't learning 3 new things, you learn one new thing: capitalized motion keys work on WORDS instead of words (aka: big movements)
You start out and you only have `h,j,k,l` available to you (despite what the help says). So just end up holding the keys and maybe that's fine but then that first level is WAY too big.
Like I got to the second area and it starts talking about word motions and then you try `w,b,e` and it then tells you those keys aren't available. That's not even the first character you talk to that is mentioning movement keys while those keys remain unavailable to you!
I rage quit after unlocking `w,b,e` and moving back to that chest at the beginning only to realize I had forgotten there was a space between the word and punctuation meaning I'd need to unlock something like `B`, `0`, `^`, or even the ability to use numbers which a character had already mentioned to me...
[1/10] do not recommend. I believe most people will be able to read half of `vimtutor` before you will unlock the `b` key in this game as well as have a much better understanding of how vim actually works.
I highly suggest vimtutor to people because what a lot of people miss while learning vim is that there isn't actually much to remember. There's sets of motion keys and sets of command keys. The beauty of vim is that the commands are putting these together. For example, say you learn `b,w,e` and then you learn `d`. You now automatically know `db, dw, de, dd`. You didn't learn 4 new things, you learned 1 new thing. Similarly learning `B,W,E` isn't learning 3 new things, you learn one new thing: capitalized motion keys work on WORDS instead of words (aka: big movements)
This one is also nice to get going:
https://www.vim-hero.com/
Very cool site! Working on my own similar project:
https://vimgolf.ai
To learn new vim motions. Have since gotten distracted by life, but need to actually finish it.
https://vimgolf.ai
To learn new vim motions. Have since gotten distracted by life, but need to actually finish it.
Neat idea! Nit: maybe offer the first few exercises without requiring a login, that way I can get a feel for it before deciding to sign up.
The required login/sign-up, privacy policy and lack of apparent open-sourcing seems antithetical for the average Linux user. You're going after a niche of a niche of a niche with this one, good luck lol.
I'd argue that the average Linux user likely knows how to use vim for the most basic editing but isn't necessarily motivated to learn vim. Intermediate users will be able to name a few modes in vim and navigate somewhat efficiently, that's about it. Only advanced users and those who really want to master vim (in other words, hardcore nerds) will try to make the most out of vim and use as few strokes as possible to navigate/edit, which is what these tools/sites are for. That's a few "niches" there.
I think once you start trying to use the occasional macro and/or make custom keybinds it pushes you further into the vim golf mindset. When you're saving an action to be repeated 100 times you really gotta get it right. I learned a lot of advanced movements due to macros as well. Like } and ) and marks (only just recently learned apostrophe jumps to marked line while backtick jumps to marked character on the line after years of always using apostrophe). I recently spent a half hour or so making two keybinds to insert the date/time in my preferred format at the end or start of a line + return the cursor to where it was before. While about half of the process was the same for both binds, I ran into multiple issues with the start of line version. Like, `I` for insert at start of line in neovim places your cursor after whitespace instead of before it, so instead had to use 0 and then insert stuff relatively. Also found out marked characters are based on the numbers of characters into the line, so if you add new stuff to the start of the line and then return to your mark, you won't be on the same word. 14 characters in before, 14 characters in now. I worked around that by counting how many I was inserting with my date text + spaces and such, then adding that # and l (move right) to the end of the keybind to make up for the difference. It was pretty satisfying when it finally worked.
You are truly a vim master. Yes, that's exactly the reason why I used containers to host the vim instances, as using a DOM based vim library wouldn't record each stroke accurately. Thank you for trying my site out.
Back from when those screencasts were a thing,
http://vimcasts.org/episodes/
http://vimcasts.org/episodes/
I generally recommend to exit either via :xa (save all & exit) or :qa! (discard all and exit), bound to ZZ or ZA respectively. If you exit via :q or :wq, it just closes the current buffer, and moves to the next one. E.g. if you have a neotree open along with the editor, you type :wq, it closes the editor buffer and moves you into the file tree, which can be very confusing for beginners.
Neotree `close_if_last_window` config setting is helpful for this case.
There are cases where you would not necessarily want to save all buffers. To me it is an eletrical term.
just do :wq :wq :wq :wq etc
:P
:P
:wqa is the same as :xa and is probably easier to remember
Are you sure? IIRC :x only writes the file again if there's a change where :w(q) always writes again (which takes longer when editing a remote file via scp://). For a non-exiting version of :x there is :up. I bound :up to <leader>fs after I learned about it. I used to have :w on the same keybind so it was a straight upgrade. Now I can just quick hit it at any time and there's no waiting around if the file hadn't changed. Saves some time and annoyances.
Yes, through ":help wqa" which lists it as such and double checking with a quick test. It doesn't write unchanged files, same as :xa instead of being an exact "all" version of :wq
That is what I do. I thought I was the only genius.
Or do ZZZZZZZZZZ
Noooooooo!
Make some key bindings. Bind leader to space, and make a leader mapping for writing to the file, and another mapping to quit. Avoid chords.
Make some key bindings. Bind leader to space, and make a leader mapping for writing to the file, and another mapping to quit. Avoid chords.
What does the :P command do?
/s
/s
:P :Print
:[range]P[rint] [count] [flags]
Just as ":print". Was apparently added to Vi for
people that keep the shift key pressed too long...
This command is not supported in Vim9 script.
Note: A user command can overrule this command.
See ex-flags for [flags].Remapping my CAPS LOCK key to the ESC key is the greatest keyboard hack ever.
This is the way...
These little tutorials and games are great. I played VIM Adventures.
However, one thing I really struggle with is learning when I can be doing something more efficiently. I rarely use markers, anything beyond default registers, commands, and so on.
I'm giving Neovim a try for my systems course trying to get better but I do wish these sorts of games pushed me to get better at these more advanced usage tricks.
However, one thing I really struggle with is learning when I can be doing something more efficiently. I rarely use markers, anything beyond default registers, commands, and so on.
I'm giving Neovim a try for my systems course trying to get better but I do wish these sorts of games pushed me to get better at these more advanced usage tricks.
> learning when I can be doing something more efficiently
hardtime.nvim[1] (or vim-hardtime[2] if you're old-school) do exactly this but within your editing session. There's an associated blog post[3] explaining the rationale behind some of the workflow choices and you can of course bring your own.
[1]: https://github.com/m4xshen/hardtime.nvim
[2]: https://github.com/takac/vim-hardtime
[3]: https://m4xshen.dev/posts/vim-command-workflow
hardtime.nvim[1] (or vim-hardtime[2] if you're old-school) do exactly this but within your editing session. There's an associated blog post[3] explaining the rationale behind some of the workflow choices and you can of course bring your own.
[1]: https://github.com/m4xshen/hardtime.nvim
[2]: https://github.com/takac/vim-hardtime
[3]: https://m4xshen.dev/posts/vim-command-workflow
Oh man, I use markers all the time.
ma
y'a
mark a spot, then yank or delete everything to that line. Way easier to do it accurately rather than 13yy or however many lines you're yanking.
mark a spot, then yank or delete everything to that line. Way easier to do it accurately rather than 13yy or however many lines you're yanking.
You can use <shift>v then move to your start line and type y or d. This way you see the text marked before yanking or deleting. <control>v is similar. And gv will reselect the marked area.
And if you have line numbering on you can y123G. I learned enough Vim 25 years ago to be good enough and I'm happy I did. When I was writing code every day I picked up a little more but I've lost most of it, and what I'd want people to know who are considering it is you never need to be a Vim Master. You can learn enough Vim in 30 minutes to make it beneficial to you for the rest of your life.
I turn on relative line numbering so that y123G might be y8j and vim will show me the 8.
ma, mb, mc => 'a, 'b, 'c => ...just being able to "tag" each of the three functions you're working with (comparing, copying, moving code, whatever) it's eventually worth it to get them into your muscle memory. And once you "get" marks, then you "get" registers "for free".
and this is why i always read vim articles... i've never used registers in my life.
I'll use them in macros fairly frequently: vawy'f => function name, vi{y'b => body, vi(y'a => args
...or y'x to keep something kindof handy that I can drop in at the right place (sometimes with a macro...)
If I keep "x" clean/protected then I can delete or edit the rest of the time all willy-nilly and not worry about clobbering what I'm trying to paste into the right spots.
...or y'x to keep something kindof handy that I can drop in at the right place (sometimes with a macro...)
qadi('xpq => @a => @@...
If I keep "x" clean/protected then I can delete or edit the rest of the time all willy-nilly and not worry about clobbering what I'm trying to paste into the right spots.
I feel so damn stupid for counting the lines with my eyes before yanking after reading this. As a staunch believer in markers, this is eye opening. I was using them just to jump between functions most of the time. This is very useful
I created a ViM Message of the Day script that I added to my shell to give me a prompt every time I opened a new shell (Which I do constantly in ViM and Tmux since I've created leader key shortcuts in both)
https://github.com/cboppert/motd
You might have to futz with it a bit, and I think I've added some other stuff in there since then (love the toggle-light-mode script which toggles several things either to Dark or Light mode at once so I can switch environments easily, however have never gotten it to fully automate, so I have to manually type goDark or goLight depending. Humbug!)
Anyways, it's great cause it gives you one tip or command at a time, and so you can sort of slowly grow without really having to dedicate much time to it.
https://github.com/cboppert/motd
You might have to futz with it a bit, and I think I've added some other stuff in there since then (love the toggle-light-mode script which toggles several things either to Dark or Light mode at once so I can switch environments easily, however have never gotten it to fully automate, so I have to manually type goDark or goLight depending. Humbug!)
Anyways, it's great cause it gives you one tip or command at a time, and so you can sort of slowly grow without really having to dedicate much time to it.
I wrote up some exercises to help build the muscle memory of advanced vim commands: https://github.com/steveshogren/10-minute-vim-exercises/blob...
Check out vim golf. They are fun puzzles but you also realise lots of little optimisations you can incorporate into regular use
The fact that Vim has been debated for decades is proof that it’s one of the greatest pieces of software.
For me, it is close to perfect.
When I was learning Linux back in the day, one of the most beneficial thing I did was to go though the VIM tutorial and learn to use it properly. I'm no master at it but oh boy that time spent has paid dividends down the line.
The Neovim Tutor is more comprehensive than the old school Vim Tutor. I recommend that people who want to get fast with the key commands go through it repeatedly until most of it becomes part of their muscle memory. When this happens, the learning curve starts looking a lot more approachable and less daunting.
https://www.vimgolf.com/ is also cool, but I find that it doesn't really help with muscle memory as much as learning cool tricks.
Cool idea, yet the first level broke me: typing :qa enters Insert mode, and it's not possible to delete the command input with a backspace.
Hopefully it's easy to fix
Hopefully it's easy to fix
Even though I don’t have much use for vim, and I have opinions on tools like this going beyond a certain level of efficiency because IMO the true bottleneck is usually decision/design based not implementation based, this just kinda looks fun and the appeal of vim as just a thing that feels cool to use when you have mastery of it sounds cool.
Kinda like how it feels good to play an instrument when you’re good at it, or something.
I might give it a try!
Kinda like how it feels good to play an instrument when you’re good at it, or something.
I might give it a try!
Agree that decisions/designs are important.
However, not everything can be well designed at the beginning. Skills of editing will affect efficiency, especially in a try-and-error loop of new ideas/approaches, where only a rough design exists.
Besides, some niche editing tasks (which may involve column editing, macro recording then batched execution, regex based operation, encoding transformation etc.) may otherwise require writing awk/sed or even perl/python scripts as subprojects to achieve, if one does not known the editor well.
However, not everything can be well designed at the beginning. Skills of editing will affect efficiency, especially in a try-and-error loop of new ideas/approaches, where only a rough design exists.
Besides, some niche editing tasks (which may involve column editing, macro recording then batched execution, regex based operation, encoding transformation etc.) may otherwise require writing awk/sed or even perl/python scripts as subprojects to achieve, if one does not known the editor well.
>column editing
I haven't seen any other editor that comes anywhere near the capabilities provided by VIM. I spend a lot of time manipulating data into columnar form and for anything early vim does it effortlessly.
I haven't seen any other editor that comes anywhere near the capabilities provided by VIM. I spend a lot of time manipulating data into columnar form and for anything early vim does it effortlessly.
Oh for sure, for specialised complex text manipulation tasks if you’re doing them often it’s definitely a tool for the job.
If you’re often doing hardcore text manipulation that’s a bit of a different story, I just personally think the average dev thinks they do that more than they actually do.
[deleted]
I got the muscle memory for hjkl down by playing https://vimsnake.com/
Played around on the official website until i tried to delete a word and closed the tab by a mistake. Saved it for future reference.
Edit: Went down a rabbit hole and see pacvim (https://github.com/jmoon018/PacVim) is in the official Debian repo as an option as well.
Edit: Went down a rabbit hole and see pacvim (https://github.com/jmoon018/PacVim) is in the official Debian repo as an option as well.
This is cool, I would love to see some more rounds and vim lessons! I use a lot of these basics on the daily.
Here's 8 chapters on how to exit Vim: https://github.com/cloudstreet-dev/Vim-with-Vigor
What I don't understand is how anyone who actually learned the basic movements can go back to using arrows or mouse to move inside text. Like sure, use VScode but if you actually took the time and know how to move in vim when will vanilla editing beat vim plugins for popular editors?
[deleted]
https://www.vimgolf.com/ is what taught me to VIM
I like the idea of vimgolf, but almost every "good solution" is a regexp replacement. Which is a problem since outside of vimgolf, I've very rarely used i. The usecase of vim regexp is quite narrow, basically only used in converting files between formats (a task I'd rather use other tools for)
Learned vim with a game like this. It was a vscode extension, I don’t remember what it was called.
Anyway it’s easily the best time investment I’ve ever made, period. Takes a couple days of messing around, and you can basically never leave modal editing behind! It’s just so much better. I’m still not even a vim master. Just the basic motions and commands are enough to never want to give em up. Throw macros and registers on top… delicious.
Also without vim I never would have tried helix, which is just absolutely the smoothest and most frictionless editing ever. Very minimal setup, too
Anyway it’s easily the best time investment I’ve ever made, period. Takes a couple days of messing around, and you can basically never leave modal editing behind! It’s just so much better. I’m still not even a vim master. Just the basic motions and commands are enough to never want to give em up. Throw macros and registers on top… delicious.
Also without vim I never would have tried helix, which is just absolutely the smoothest and most frictionless editing ever. Very minimal setup, too
> I’m still not even a vim master.
Joking aside, I think that's one of the nice things about vim. There's always more to learn. Not in the way that you're missing something but in the same way this is true for any programming language. It's because these tools are so flexible they can do just about anything
Vim isn't an editor, it's an interactive programming language for text processing.
If I'm not going to have to do it a bunch, sometimes vim itself is faster than writing a script to do whatever random task I need done.
:%norm 0f"ldt"i...
If I'm not going to have to do it a bunch, sometimes vim itself is faster than writing a script to do whatever random task I need done.
Try `vim -c`. Or better, in your terminal press <C-x><C-e>
I have also used vim macros to do all sorts of text formatting that would have otherwise taken ages!!
One time my girlfriend needed to format a bunch of text, I don’t remember why. It was like a csv but couldn’t be opened in excel because it was badly formatted or something?
Anyway her work computer had vim on it, and I totally saved the day. Pretty much the proudest moment of my life lol. It was like this xkcd, but for vim https://xkcd.com/208/
One time my girlfriend needed to format a bunch of text, I don’t remember why. It was like a csv but couldn’t be opened in excel because it was badly formatted or something?
Anyway her work computer had vim on it, and I totally saved the day. Pretty much the proudest moment of my life lol. It was like this xkcd, but for vim https://xkcd.com/208/
I have that shirt! ;-)
The other day (we're being encouraged to "use AI" at work), I had a bunch of 20250101, 20250201, ... fields in a g-sheet at work. I decide to ask google's AI to "help out", hey... can you convert these integers to ISO date strings?
"Sure can do, old buddy, old, pal, here you go, it's '2025-01-01', '2025-02-01', etc..."
OK, great, can you put those rows into the spreadsheet now? "Whoah whoa... I used python code to do that for you" => "Can you do it with a spreadsheet formula or something? Can you replace those rows? What's the formula to convert this into a string / iso date? ...etc..."
Finally I'm just like "fuck it!", grabbed it in vim, `Ctrl-V, G, I-, ll.` and pasted it all back in. Like 10 keystrokes instead of arguing with our new robot overlords. :-D
The other day (we're being encouraged to "use AI" at work), I had a bunch of 20250101, 20250201, ... fields in a g-sheet at work. I decide to ask google's AI to "help out", hey... can you convert these integers to ISO date strings?
"Sure can do, old buddy, old, pal, here you go, it's '2025-01-01', '2025-02-01', etc..."
OK, great, can you put those rows into the spreadsheet now? "Whoah whoa... I used python code to do that for you" => "Can you do it with a spreadsheet formula or something? Can you replace those rows? What's the formula to convert this into a string / iso date? ...etc..."
Finally I'm just like "fuck it!", grabbed it in vim, `Ctrl-V, G, I-, ll.` and pasted it all back in. Like 10 keystrokes instead of arguing with our new robot overlords. :-D
Searching for "vim game" this is the only thing I found:
Vscode Vim Academy
https://marketplace.visualstudio.com/items?itemName=kaisun.v...
Does that look like what you used?
Vscode Vim Academy
https://marketplace.visualstudio.com/items?itemName=kaisun.v...
Does that look like what you used?
ok actually upon closer inspection, the extension was not a game, just a "learn vim" type of thing. I think I got it mixed up with a vim game I found online.
https://marketplace.visualstudio.com/items?itemName=vinthara...
https://marketplace.visualstudio.com/items?itemName=vinthara...
I like how it starts with how to exit vim, but let's be honest: word jumps are not that common to teach second
[deleted]
`diw`/`daw` doesn't work correctly. The i/a makes it go to insert mode.
Ah, yet another brave soul seeks to gamify the ancient art of Vim. Admirable.
But Vim is not merely a tool... it's a discipline. A lifestyle. It is not learned in an afternoon, nor in a weekend sprint of neon-highlighted tutorials. No, Vim is best learned like one reads a long, weathered tome: slowly, reverently, one page at a time.
It begins humbly: i to whisper your intentions. <Esc> :wq to seal your work with a sacred rite. Then, perhaps days or weeks later, a revelation: "Wait… I can delete four lines with 4dd?!"
You do not master Vim. You grow into it. Each new keystroke discovered is like finding a hidden passage in a familiar castle. What begins as a cryptic incantation eventually becomes second nature... muscle memory and magic intertwined.
So yes, make it a game. But know that Vim is not beaten. It is befriended over years, not minutes.
But Vim is not merely a tool... it's a discipline. A lifestyle. It is not learned in an afternoon, nor in a weekend sprint of neon-highlighted tutorials. No, Vim is best learned like one reads a long, weathered tome: slowly, reverently, one page at a time.
It begins humbly: i to whisper your intentions. <Esc> :wq to seal your work with a sacred rite. Then, perhaps days or weeks later, a revelation: "Wait… I can delete four lines with 4dd?!"
You do not master Vim. You grow into it. Each new keystroke discovered is like finding a hidden passage in a familiar castle. What begins as a cryptic incantation eventually becomes second nature... muscle memory and magic intertwined.
So yes, make it a game. But know that Vim is not beaten. It is befriended over years, not minutes.
Anyone can learn :q to quit vim
But can anyone truly quit vim? No
But can anyone truly quit vim? No
Doesn't support config with a non-dedault keybind? That's not very mastery
Tried the challenge mode - would like to see support for Ctrl + [, acting as escape!
Also on team <C-[>!
Why remap? This is native. Maybe your keyboard has brackets in a tough place but that also makes it sound like it's hard to use arrays
Why remap? This is native. Maybe your keyboard has brackets in a tough place but that also makes it sound like it's hard to use arrays
[deleted]
I really dig this. I might work on it a bit to include it in my lessons.
What key combination opens the AI context menu?
Here is a possible way to do it sending the current buffer to the standard input:
:%!ai-cliI guess that's one way to do it, but not the best possible UX of course.
That’s one possible baseline, you can easily attach this or something more elaborate to whatever key-(combination) you feel relevant.
Good UX matches expectations. Vim trades easy defaults for adaptability, therefore the expectations are different.
Nice job. Ideal next level should be macros.
Yeah, this is a great idea. Seems like there are others out there. I am intermediate in VIM and use it very frequently so the basic stuff I have down, but I am slow when doing advanced things. If anyone has a game like this but has advanced topics and is good for practicing those advanced topics I'd love to hear about it.
Needs more levels!
cute but should go much harder/further
That’s what I’m kind of looking for. Something that shows more advanced features.
I feel like most of these tutorial like apps just scratch the surface and are more beginner focused.
I feel like most of these tutorial like apps just scratch the surface and are more beginner focused.
ed Master when?
I really don't want to learn much more of vi than is documented in the POSIX standard:
https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9799919799/utilities/
I'm in busybox and on OpenBSD quite a bit, and all the vim embellishments would be a clutter of my neurons.
https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9799919799/utilities/
I'm in busybox and on OpenBSD quite a bit, and all the vim embellishments would be a clutter of my neurons.
Cool that you're into retrocomputing, but many of the rest of us think perhaps some features added to vim from the last 30 years might be useful.
That vi was standardized was one of the many failures of POSIX as an idea. The very idea that we should freeze a text editor for all time is silliness in the extreme.
That vi was standardized was one of the many failures of POSIX as an idea. The very idea that we should freeze a text editor for all time is silliness in the extreme.
While you may be a detractor, Apple appears to be an ardent admirer.
https://www.opengroup.org/openbrand/register/
https://www.opengroup.org/openbrand/register/
Yet they ship macOS with vim installed and zsh as the default shell.
Don't let on that OpenBSD does not have vi either. Its vi is actually nvi, yet another vi clone, that Keith Bostic derived from elvis.
meanwhile there's also text editors that dont make you doubt yourself and fall on your face each time someone walks by ur workstation and you want to show them some kind of space-invaders-word-editing-trick which always fails because your fingers arent rubber bands afterall.
(sorry totally nano lover :p satire/jokes)