What's Up with Peter Thiel's Obsession with the Antichrist?(newrepublic.com)
newrepublic.com
What's Up with Peter Thiel's Obsession with the Antichrist?
https://newrepublic.com/article/200471/peter-thiel-obsession-antichrist-religion
60 comments
I don’t know about Thiel specifically, but since the Charlie Kirk assassination, I’ve noticed many on the right have suddenly become a lot more religiously political rather than just political. For example they are now talking about Christian values being the foundation of the country or how different cultures (like Chinese or Indian or Latino) aren’t compatible with a Christian society and its norms or whatever. I see this on YouTube and social media. It’s strange seeing the theological twist on political topics suddenly become central, and also the religious supremacist tones. I wonder if Thiel’s adjacency to those groups is also the cause of his use of the Antichrist metaphor.
> different cultures (like Chinese or Indian or Latino) aren’t compatible with a Christian society and its norms or whatever.
One of these things is not like the others. One of these things just doesn't belong. Can you tell which thing is not like the others by the time I finish my song?
I don't know if the error is yours or theirs, but Latinos are by and large Christian.
One of these things is not like the others. One of these things just doesn't belong. Can you tell which thing is not like the others by the time I finish my song?
I don't know if the error is yours or theirs, but Latinos are by and large Christian.
one word missing "White" - White Christian Nationalists. not sure who would take that as an insult and who refers to themselves as such
I think that might be a form of frequency illusion… these people have been saying exactly the same shit exactly as loudly and exactly as often since (at least) the Satanic Panic.
[deleted]
>Latino, not Christian...
500 years ago these people would be burnt at the stake in seconds... jk.
If any, Hispanic cultures from Catholic backgrounds are ideologically far more Christian (the society comes first, the individual are struggles are secondary, community bound families and friends...) than any mega-selfish Evangelical cult idolizing money. Inb4 'The Vatican it's loaded' yes, we know it, but the closest members to the society are far more humble than these wackos holding millions in megachurches.
I'm not a Catholic myself but of course I'm a cultural byproduct of it.
500 years ago these people would be burnt at the stake in seconds... jk.
If any, Hispanic cultures from Catholic backgrounds are ideologically far more Christian (the society comes first, the individual are struggles are secondary, community bound families and friends...) than any mega-selfish Evangelical cult idolizing money. Inb4 'The Vatican it's loaded' yes, we know it, but the closest members to the society are far more humble than these wackos holding millions in megachurches.
I'm not a Catholic myself but of course I'm a cultural byproduct of it.
It’s possible the evangelical Christians in America simply hold racist views against these groups and are trying to popularize that intolerance but with a religious or moral justification. To be honest I don’t really know, since I am not around evangelicals often. Mostly I’m just surprised to see the rhetoric in the open.
Just like Isis, Al-Qaeda, Taliban, etc claim to be Muslims but are perverting it to justify their jihad, the MAGA-movement seems to be doing the same..
This anthropologist spoke before the UN about Islamic radicalization. It's not hard to see that the same sort of radicalization happened to white men in the US, and Europe for that matter (those poor poor "victims" /s): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qlbirlSA-dc
This anthropologist spoke before the UN about Islamic radicalization. It's not hard to see that the same sort of radicalization happened to white men in the US, and Europe for that matter (those poor poor "victims" /s): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qlbirlSA-dc
Its always the same with the right: its plain racism.
Its the in-group trait the tribe gathers around. And it can change to anything and back again. From "drain the swap", to "no epstein files", to "democrat haux", to "ill release them as promised". The factual matters, what reasonable people call political convictions, does not matter to the uninformed voters.
It's funny that you mention latinos, when they are more aligned with values that conservatives claim to preach like family and Christian values.
Because it's not about religion. It's shocking that, despite their opposition explicitly calling them out for decades and history books being filled with the explanation, otherwise intelligent people are seemingly incapable of understanding it's about race.
Yeah, no, Latin men swung wildly towards Trump in the last election, due to religion and family values. Try again.
I don't know what thread you think you're replying to, but this is a complete non sequitur as a response to me?
Using Thiel's own words:
"Perhaps we should fear the Antichrist, perhaps we should fear the one-world totalitarian state more than Armageddon."
A prerequisite for antichrist is a world without boundaries: moral or territorial. The Thiel's totalitarian state. The nature of antichrist can be understood if we look at what Christianity and other major religions are all about: ungluing ourselves from things, desires and thoughts of this world and transcending to the kingdom of heaven. Anti-religions will teach the opposite: to glue ourselves to shiny things, to lose ourselves in desires and to marvel at the depths of demonic thought. Antichrist, if it comes, will be a living example of these three aspects: his body will be nearly indestructible, his desires will transcend our imagination and his brain will be a demonic mastermind, probably powered by some Al chip. Right now there are no technologies to create such a thing.
As for why Thiel is so bothered with this topic, I think it's because he's knowingly or unknowingly serving the powers that want this future to come true. His mental proximity to their headquarters is what gives him insights, in other words.
"Perhaps we should fear the Antichrist, perhaps we should fear the one-world totalitarian state more than Armageddon."
A prerequisite for antichrist is a world without boundaries: moral or territorial. The Thiel's totalitarian state. The nature of antichrist can be understood if we look at what Christianity and other major religions are all about: ungluing ourselves from things, desires and thoughts of this world and transcending to the kingdom of heaven. Anti-religions will teach the opposite: to glue ourselves to shiny things, to lose ourselves in desires and to marvel at the depths of demonic thought. Antichrist, if it comes, will be a living example of these three aspects: his body will be nearly indestructible, his desires will transcend our imagination and his brain will be a demonic mastermind, probably powered by some Al chip. Right now there are no technologies to create such a thing.
As for why Thiel is so bothered with this topic, I think it's because he's knowingly or unknowingly serving the powers that want this future to come true. His mental proximity to their headquarters is what gives him insights, in other words.
"Anti-religions will teach the opposite: to glue ourselves to shiny things, to lose ourselves in desires and to marvel at the depths of demonic thought"
I'd be rare though possible (maybe Bertrand Russell as an example) to have good character without having been first taught from a religion sharing the old testament (in the west) or say bhuddism elsewhere.
Although as I write above particularly with the literal interpretation of the Bible which leads to bad outcomes, I'm not keen to dismiss religion. That's too much.
However it's too much to suggest atheists or agnostic or those who take the Bible more at arms length are just about getting laid, cash, and cars. The basic American character appeals to some charity, being straight with people, hard work, and being competent at something. Family counts too.
To the degree it's american its just as likely as being fairly universal no doubt with local areas of emphasis.
Of course there are live for today jerks, however, that same character compels us to do the right thing anyway.
I'd be rare though possible (maybe Bertrand Russell as an example) to have good character without having been first taught from a religion sharing the old testament (in the west) or say bhuddism elsewhere.
Although as I write above particularly with the literal interpretation of the Bible which leads to bad outcomes, I'm not keen to dismiss religion. That's too much.
However it's too much to suggest atheists or agnostic or those who take the Bible more at arms length are just about getting laid, cash, and cars. The basic American character appeals to some charity, being straight with people, hard work, and being competent at something. Family counts too.
To the degree it's american its just as likely as being fairly universal no doubt with local areas of emphasis.
Of course there are live for today jerks, however, that same character compels us to do the right thing anyway.
It's not literal.
It says directly in the article:
"...defined the practice of politics as a struggle against an existential enemy, arguing that politics is just religion in disguise." and "human societies tend to spiral toward violence in a hunt for scapegoats."
The antichrist idea is metaphor that he likes.
It says directly in the article:
"...defined the practice of politics as a struggle against an existential enemy, arguing that politics is just religion in disguise." and "human societies tend to spiral toward violence in a hunt for scapegoats."
The antichrist idea is metaphor that he likes.
For anyone believing he might be a sane person after reading this, consider this part:
>He even named a suspect: Greta Thunberg.
It's insane how much hatred industrialists and boomers in general seem to focus on a kid who's fed up with their bullshit and tried to rally up other kids. I guess subconsciously they believe this mindset threatens their wealth so much that they can literally compare it to the antichrist.
>He even named a suspect: Greta Thunberg.
It's insane how much hatred industrialists and boomers in general seem to focus on a kid who's fed up with their bullshit and tried to rally up other kids. I guess subconsciously they believe this mindset threatens their wealth so much that they can literally compare it to the antichrist.
Greta Thunberg is a force to be reconed with, she has an exceptionaly articulate way of stateing exsactly what the establishment does not want to hear, stands up and does that and does not flinch.
Speaking to the british parliment, 12min speach, bieng mocked with false clapping and laughter, 2019, she was 16.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=rYNM4rsnNFM
transcript
https://awpc.cattcenter.iastate.edu/2019/12/03/speech-to-the...
Again speaking to the European Parliment, simlar speach around the same time.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=4oyw4Wo6Kng
I think everyone knows just where she is right at this moment and how she is forceing an awareness of the conection between climate and human justice.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=rYNM4rsnNFM
transcript
https://awpc.cattcenter.iastate.edu/2019/12/03/speech-to-the...
Again speaking to the European Parliment, simlar speach around the same time.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=4oyw4Wo6Kng
I think everyone knows just where she is right at this moment and how she is forceing an awareness of the conection between climate and human justice.
"Thiel refers to climate change activist Greta Thunberg as the Antichrist." https://www.thenation.com/article/society/peter-thiel-billio...
He's spent too much time huffing Alexander Dugin's flatulence. It's no different to how revanchist parties in the United States these days characterize their battle against their (domestic) enemies. Just a rhetorical foil.
It’s also another example of someone who believes their success in one narrow area makes them an authority in everything else
There are few people alive who are less fit to lecture us on matters of theology and morality than Peter Thiel.
There are few people alive who are less fit to lecture us on matters of theology and morality than Peter Thiel.
I think that sometimes we forget the fact that famous people have regular people brains under their famous skin.
I knew a guy who, hitting fifty or so, with more time on his hands, got really into collecting the wrappers of "Tunnock's Tea Cakes", which are a confectionary product housed in elegant gold packaging. Other people get into horse racing, or MLM scams, or - very, very frequently - history.
It is interesting that Thiel has become more interested in 'the antichrist', given a lot of people would cast him as such. But if I was a billionaire, and my new hobby was religious history - particularly the idea of "the antichrist" - there is absolutely no way I wouldn't be using my money to hold conferences about it and shit like that. I mean, wouldn't you, about your thing, were you a billionaire? He's a gigantic nerd like the rest of us.
Maybe it's an edgy, mid-life-crisis, "I'm so scary" emo pose - in a kind of Hot Topic way. Or maybe Thiel is actually the antichrist, or trying to summon him. Or whatever. But, usually, when a person does this sort of thing, it's usually just because they're interested in it and have the time.
You can take the bad-faith, more exciting view of it, obviously. Or - and this is arguably more embarrassing for Thiel, I think - see it as what it likely is: The hobby a middle-aged man might choose when his obscene wealth meant you would need a really, really, really large amount of Tunnock's Tea Cake wrappers - perhaps the whole company - to scratch the same relative itch.
I knew a guy who, hitting fifty or so, with more time on his hands, got really into collecting the wrappers of "Tunnock's Tea Cakes", which are a confectionary product housed in elegant gold packaging. Other people get into horse racing, or MLM scams, or - very, very frequently - history.
It is interesting that Thiel has become more interested in 'the antichrist', given a lot of people would cast him as such. But if I was a billionaire, and my new hobby was religious history - particularly the idea of "the antichrist" - there is absolutely no way I wouldn't be using my money to hold conferences about it and shit like that. I mean, wouldn't you, about your thing, were you a billionaire? He's a gigantic nerd like the rest of us.
Maybe it's an edgy, mid-life-crisis, "I'm so scary" emo pose - in a kind of Hot Topic way. Or maybe Thiel is actually the antichrist, or trying to summon him. Or whatever. But, usually, when a person does this sort of thing, it's usually just because they're interested in it and have the time.
You can take the bad-faith, more exciting view of it, obviously. Or - and this is arguably more embarrassing for Thiel, I think - see it as what it likely is: The hobby a middle-aged man might choose when his obscene wealth meant you would need a really, really, really large amount of Tunnock's Tea Cake wrappers - perhaps the whole company - to scratch the same relative itch.
I'm currently enjoying a book that seems to be a mix of fiction and non-fiction that gives a history of satan in theology - the character has changed a lot in the last 4000 years.
The title is "the devil's best trick" and the premise is that the satan has tricked us into no longer believing in supernatural evil.
I personally don't believe in god and supernatural evil but this book has given me nightmares which is something I haven't experienced for decades.
The title is "the devil's best trick" and the premise is that the satan has tricked us into no longer believing in supernatural evil.
I personally don't believe in god and supernatural evil but this book has given me nightmares which is something I haven't experienced for decades.
Once you read about Paleontology religious nightmares crumble into dust as they can't support themselves against physical evidence.
Also, if you think about it, the Chinese, Hindi, you Americans themselves from Canada to the Patagonia, Japanese.. didn't know about Jesus for millenia and they it did pretty fine without any major issues.
Also, if you think about it, the Chinese, Hindi, you Americans themselves from Canada to the Patagonia, Japanese.. didn't know about Jesus for millenia and they it did pretty fine without any major issues.
> Once you read about Paleontology religious nightmares crumble into dust as they can't support themselves against physical evidence.
Only if you're a biblical literalist, which was not popular until the massive growth of Protestantism (and I suspect you'd be hard pressed to find a biblical literalist Quaker).
Only if you're a biblical literalist, which was not popular until the massive growth of Protestantism (and I suspect you'd be hard pressed to find a biblical literalist Quaker).
Must point out, why does everyone not from the US assume everyone they disagree with online is from the US?
The concept of "supernatural evil" is so childishly dumb though. Psychopaths acting in greedy self interest is scary enough.
> What's Up with Peter Thiel's Obsession with the Antichrist?
Maybe he's annoyed since, he knows _he's_ actually the antichrist?
Personally, I'm an evangelical... an evangelical atheist. I always try to spread the good word that there is no invisible guy in outer space overlooking the human race. We're on our own here.
So, in spite of the fact that I believe the bible is an historical tale of incest and murder, with no more factual information than Pulp Fiction, I do actually believe one part of it is true:
Christians will start to follow false prophets, and they'll all go to hell.
Maybe he's annoyed since, he knows _he's_ actually the antichrist?
Personally, I'm an evangelical... an evangelical atheist. I always try to spread the good word that there is no invisible guy in outer space overlooking the human race. We're on our own here.
So, in spite of the fact that I believe the bible is an historical tale of incest and murder, with no more factual information than Pulp Fiction, I do actually believe one part of it is true:
Christians will start to follow false prophets, and they'll all go to hell.
I was raised in a fundamentalist evangelical household where speaking in tongues (spirit) and all realted new testament stuff was done. Also involved: the second coming, anti-Christ, books of Daniel and Revelations. They took it literally.
Through my teens there were three distinct e.g. during AIDs onset for one my parent's church pushed the second coming as imminent which meant there was triple emphasis on being saved ... man oh man what an emotional and intellectually distorting time that was.
I ended church by 17 and never looked back.
Extended focus in that mind set also tends to lead to a kind of short-termism: if God is going enact the final judgement why bother about tomorrow? It is a very, very strange business to live through.
Through my teens there were three distinct e.g. during AIDs onset for one my parent's church pushed the second coming as imminent which meant there was triple emphasis on being saved ... man oh man what an emotional and intellectually distorting time that was.
I ended church by 17 and never looked back.
Extended focus in that mind set also tends to lead to a kind of short-termism: if God is going enact the final judgement why bother about tomorrow? It is a very, very strange business to live through.
An interesting take from EA a few days ago:
https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/hGwAohPbwCrDT5ynY/...
There's obviously a lot to unpack, but IMO the buried lede - the new idea Thiel is trying to push - is that the "antichrist" wants to regulate AI.
This is of course a persuasion effort by Thiel that tries to do a few things - I don't have a personal opinion, but speculating I assume Thiel is trying to get ahead of something here. We haven't really seen a regulatory push in the mainstream _yet_. On the contrary, there has been a number of legal exemptions. I would bet (60/40) that in the near future we'll see "AI regulation" become a pertinent topic of mainstream discourse.
https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/hGwAohPbwCrDT5ynY/...
There's obviously a lot to unpack, but IMO the buried lede - the new idea Thiel is trying to push - is that the "antichrist" wants to regulate AI.
This is of course a persuasion effort by Thiel that tries to do a few things - I don't have a personal opinion, but speculating I assume Thiel is trying to get ahead of something here. We haven't really seen a regulatory push in the mainstream _yet_. On the contrary, there has been a number of legal exemptions. I would bet (60/40) that in the near future we'll see "AI regulation" become a pertinent topic of mainstream discourse.
Autobiographical?
stop being interested in the content of what Peter Thiel is saying, and start being interested in the social and political function of what he is saying.
Content: Antichrist, prophecies, futurism; nothing that holds a truth value. Antichrist prophecies have been well established for hundreds of years as making coded gematria claims about Nero Caesar, a mother-murdering tyrannical ruler of the foreign empire that had recently destroyed the Second Temple ~79CE by the time John of Patmos was bitterly writing in ~95CE. "Nero Caesar" transliterated from Greek ('nrwn qsr') into Hebrew and added up using standard gematria gives 666. "Nero Caesar" transliterated from Latin ('nrw qsr') to Hebrew and added up gives 616, which appears in the earliest manuscripts. It's so plain and so obviously concerned with contemporary political goals of the author as to be almost boring.
Social Function: What is the social and political function achieved by Peter Thiel doing this in today's environment, styling himself as a Prophet of 'antichrist' matters?
It provides a swift pathway to an important role in unifying and binding himself to the anti-democratic theocratic Dominionists which he currently has little influence over, alongside the existing base that he already has vast influence over: the antidemocratic faction of the tech industry. By achieving a role unifying and consolidating power over the two major antidemocratic power blocs - both of which have built in tools of vast social influence (religion, social media), Peter Thiel aspires to place himself in a position of staggering influence atop a worldwide upheaval that is demolishing democratic power structures further every day.
I really think greater fluency in religion and in politics and history would help tech workers equip themselves resist be manipulated and controlled this way.
For the other bloc - the religious bloc being fished here- it has been fertile ground for grifters for decades now, so I hold very little hope that the theocrats (and in particular the New Apostolic Reformation crowd) have any hope of applying the appropriate scrutiny to Thiel's "prophetic religious claims" to allow that bloc to identify and somehow resist this cynical and dystopian power-play.
Further details:
https://www.reddit.com/r/atheism/comments/1n9djkf/peter_thie...
Content: Antichrist, prophecies, futurism; nothing that holds a truth value. Antichrist prophecies have been well established for hundreds of years as making coded gematria claims about Nero Caesar, a mother-murdering tyrannical ruler of the foreign empire that had recently destroyed the Second Temple ~79CE by the time John of Patmos was bitterly writing in ~95CE. "Nero Caesar" transliterated from Greek ('nrwn qsr') into Hebrew and added up using standard gematria gives 666. "Nero Caesar" transliterated from Latin ('nrw qsr') to Hebrew and added up gives 616, which appears in the earliest manuscripts. It's so plain and so obviously concerned with contemporary political goals of the author as to be almost boring.
Social Function: What is the social and political function achieved by Peter Thiel doing this in today's environment, styling himself as a Prophet of 'antichrist' matters?
It provides a swift pathway to an important role in unifying and binding himself to the anti-democratic theocratic Dominionists which he currently has little influence over, alongside the existing base that he already has vast influence over: the antidemocratic faction of the tech industry. By achieving a role unifying and consolidating power over the two major antidemocratic power blocs - both of which have built in tools of vast social influence (religion, social media), Peter Thiel aspires to place himself in a position of staggering influence atop a worldwide upheaval that is demolishing democratic power structures further every day.
I really think greater fluency in religion and in politics and history would help tech workers equip themselves resist be manipulated and controlled this way.
For the other bloc - the religious bloc being fished here- it has been fertile ground for grifters for decades now, so I hold very little hope that the theocrats (and in particular the New Apostolic Reformation crowd) have any hope of applying the appropriate scrutiny to Thiel's "prophetic religious claims" to allow that bloc to identify and somehow resist this cynical and dystopian power-play.
Further details:
https://www.reddit.com/r/atheism/comments/1n9djkf/peter_thie...
Totally agree: what is the objective or payoff to thiel's behavior?
As i say above the antichrist was on the way according to my parent's church a bunch of times in the 80s which is obvious twaddle. So either Thiel is a dilletant of bs because he's a moron (so why listen?) or there's a hidden objective.
As i say above the antichrist was on the way according to my parent's church a bunch of times in the 80s which is obvious twaddle. So either Thiel is a dilletant of bs because he's a moron (so why listen?) or there's a hidden objective.
> It provides a swift pathway to an important role in unifying and binding himself to the anti-democratic theocratic Dominionists which he currently has little influence ove
Does he not need Yiannopoulos style conversion therapy first?
Does he not need Yiannopoulos style conversion therapy first?
sorry it's in french language, but this Great Thunberg fascination I find hilarious: https://youtu.be/aF4RH_fiT5k?si=fSysQKC6EvXlhHF1
We should be worrying more about a possible failed state that has 1000s of nukes.
Too much politics on HN for my taste.
It's an understandable lament but the US is in a moment of crisis -- this is the hacking of democracy in action.
What happened to his face?
Turning into a reptiloid...
He always looked wonky.
What I've noticed is he sounds a lot less measured and more jittery now than he did before. I remember videos of talks he did in the early 2000's and his zero to one lecture series that were pretty smooth and articulate, his interviews recently have him seem a lot more nervous (for lack of a better word)
Looks something like a botched cosmetic surgery
arghandugh(3)
Is it autobiographical?
Pleas stop... Every Armageddon mention I see is like reading half of the chapter... Becouse those scary scary armies coming to battle in Armagedon ware just self-brainwashed bunch of arogants: "we are so powerfull! we! etc"... Hiper balooned egos.
And that was instantly bursted.
With ONE word.
And opposition was like some unarmed but saint peoples on the ponies. Almoust ;) With a Leader.
Just read that Apocalipse chapter sentence or two longer !
And trust in God. "Only God know when end is coming".
Don't be Warhammer 40k brain-dead and ego buffed _permament_ agressor. Beliver or not.
And that was instantly bursted.
With ONE word.
And opposition was like some unarmed but saint peoples on the ponies. Almoust ;) With a Leader.
Just read that Apocalipse chapter sentence or two longer !
And trust in God. "Only God know when end is coming".
Don't be Warhammer 40k brain-dead and ego buffed _permament_ agressor. Beliver or not.
Comedian Tim Dillon had some amusing, less partisan takes on this. His style is often an ironic parody of the self-serious. Yet another case of a comedian being more reasonable than the journalist classes.
The author loses the high-ground where he frames it as a kind of irrational hysteria. It isn't that the satanic panic wasn't irrational, but that the partisan media's framing of their opponents is generally irrational. I kind of checked out where he invoked national socialism.
Introspective analysis would go much further here. A movement that constantly berates the out-group, while celebrating themselves and the inclusive and tolerant ones - The hypocrisy is the least of the problems. The impotence is more off-putting.
There's very little these partisan journos can do to change their opponents, who have tuned them out completely. There's little or nothing they can do to reform their own positions or methods while they claim the mantle of righteousness. What's left is doubling down on even more partisan zealotry.
It doesn't inform us. It divides us.
The author loses the high-ground where he frames it as a kind of irrational hysteria. It isn't that the satanic panic wasn't irrational, but that the partisan media's framing of their opponents is generally irrational. I kind of checked out where he invoked national socialism.
Introspective analysis would go much further here. A movement that constantly berates the out-group, while celebrating themselves and the inclusive and tolerant ones - The hypocrisy is the least of the problems. The impotence is more off-putting.
There's very little these partisan journos can do to change their opponents, who have tuned them out completely. There's little or nothing they can do to reform their own positions or methods while they claim the mantle of righteousness. What's left is doubling down on even more partisan zealotry.
It doesn't inform us. It divides us.