Moreover, i imagine a lot of these bots are built on top of an SDK instead of directly working with API calls, so would be just a matter of changing the SDK internals.
Vet is probably a very good example of economies of scale. I remember a vet in my town in Brazil complaining how hard it is if he get ill (or take vacations i presume), that he will lose his customers and how much he regretted not becoming a state employee.
A good example of that is how the Axiom of choice impacts the measure/probability theory.
It imply the existence of some sets that cannot be Lebesgue measured (which is an generalization of width, volume, etc for arbitrary sets, also generalization of probability for arbitrary sets)... but it's not possible to present a single example of those non measurable sets, only prove that they exist.
And it's possible to construct an alternative theory with the axiom of determinacy, then any subset of R is measurable.
> At this point I was interested and decided to take a look if the Wii U implementation suffers from the same issue. To my surprise the Wii U implementation looks something like this instead
So, how does the author got hold of Wii's code, is it publicly available or was it some kind of reverse engineering?
If I understood it correctly, it can actually be worse than fallback to plain text, because if a malicious actor can stability a connection using legacy SSLv2, then this connection can be used to decrypt the session for users running the latest TLS version.
While plain text connections would affected only users using the plain text connection.
I swear I thought it was about banning trading futures on Onion Tor hidden services. Then on second read I thought it was about banning trading in layers, like onions, whatever that meant.